Marsh. |
07-03-2019 10:07 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by iRyan
(Post 10469238)
There is simply not always going to be hard evidence in sexual abuse cases, especially those involving children. From the way it’s been described, Michael was extremely calculated in how he carried out the abuse. What other evidence could there possibly be other than the word of people who crossed paths with him? I’m sure he was smarter than to have child pornography laying around or have acts that occurred in his own home be recorded on camera. Although there was this particular instance of a housekeeper who testified against him, which rings very clear alarm bells:
|
I never said there is going to be hard evidence, especially all of these years later. I'm simply pointing out that words are just that and not the hard evidence some people seem to want it to be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iRyan
(Post 10469238)
But by all means believe what you want I guess.
|
Not sure why you're saying this, as though I'm simply believing anything. There's no evidence either way so my opinion is just like yours.... based on the words of people we've never met.
To clarify, I don't necessarily believe MJ is innocent of all of these allegations. But I definitely do not believe in a trial by media 10 years after his death because a couple of blokes have a vendetta against his estate.
|