![]() |
Quote:
|
4 lads in my row at footy all sharing a vape
#weenic#profwhitty#nhsoverwhelmed |
Quote:
It’s not about “wanting” a disaster scenario, but it is sensible to be prepared for bad scenarios rather than trying to get by on raw optimism. Maybe it is settling, I’m not saying that I hope you’re wrong, I’m saying that drawing that conclusion from a couple of days worth of data is dumb. We don’t know anything from these numbers, no conclusions can be drawn from them at all, until we have at least a week+ (10 days would probably be a decent measure) to go on. Believing that a couple of days showing less increase is conclusive of anything tends to just result in people getting an unpleasant shock when there’s a sudden jump later and it turns out that there’s been a flaw in reporting mechanisms or somewhere else. For example… We’ve been told repeatedly that some areas have run out of PCR tests. If people (with mild symptoms) aren’t being tested and recover fine after a few days, then they were never added to the numbers. The important figures - as ever - are hospitalisations and deaths. We’re not going to have an accurate picture on those for at least another week or two. |
Quote:
To be fair the numbers DO drop substantially each Sat / Sun/ Mon then Tuesday catches up It’s a technical hitch not the infections slowing down each weekend Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Quote:
90,000 on Saturday suggests that Tuesday’s will be well over 100,000 !! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Quote:
Not even close to peaking imho Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
For my two cents, I think ever hitting 1 million cases a day is extremely unlikely but over 250k/day certainly possible.
|
Quote:
Sadly I agree .. Just have to hope it is indeed milder and the vast majority don’t need hospital treatment or we are completely fecked Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
if we remember back to when we first re-opened the government at the time said don't be surprised if we hit 100k infections, so they were quite happy to deal with that number of infections per day and have restrictions completely removed. Yes, infections may still rise but its not exponential growth, that means hospitals have more time to deal with things.
I accept the point that the pcr testing could be way out, but that is true all the time surely |
Oh I think it could be fairly safely assumed that actual daily positive cases are (always) at least 2x the number of positive tests. Maybe more like 3x. That’s really always been the case, many mild cases and the majority of asymptomatic cases aren’t in the figures.
|
Pity Omicron didn’t come in Jan rather than bladdy December :(
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
|
|
|
[Johnson and his ministers
ignore Scientists' Pleas for even tougher Covid restrictions before Christmas as yesterday's cases top 90,000 - but 'could impose crackdown as soon as Boxing Day'] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Christmas.html This does not sound right Can not start this on a Holiday day. |
[Javid refuses to deny plans for more restrictions
as he accuses anti-vaxxers of having 'damaging impact'] https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...mpact-12499691 |
So another country has banned uk visitors ( Germany ) so are we the only country where omicron is running absolutely crazy ?
If so why would that be ? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Quote:
Not the Same as what France has done: [COVID-19: Germany announces quarantine for UK travellers to slow Omicron spread It comes after France banned travel to and from the UK without a "compelling" reason as concern grows in Europe over Britain's Omicron situation.] https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-...om-uk-12499609 |
Coronavirus Outbreak : France Bans UK Visitors
Also someone just said on the radio that little children ( say under 7) aren’t a concern as they RARELY pass on the COVID-19 infection as they only carry a very small viral load ?!??
Is this true or another piece of misinformation? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
[COVID news live: Sajid Javid says actual coronavirus infections
'significantly higher' than official figures show Coronavirus latest as SAGE warns more restrictions are needed "within days", tougher measures 'could be imposed after Boxing Day'; Omicron cases in the UK increase by more than 10,000; Netherlands goes into lockdown.] The Live Link https://news.sky.com/story/covid-new...laims-12469075 |
Quote:
Ok but it still suggests that they regard the UK as a concern .. why though Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
Quote:
I think they do pass it on. |
Quote:
Because we have High numbers catching Omicron, Nickys Nation (Netherlands) has had the sense to Lockdown Proper |
Surely if it’s so virulent the whole world would be shutting down to all other countries rather than just the uk
Just wondered why we seem to be doing worse than everyone else ? Is it simply due to us being a tiny island with a dense ( both meanings ) population ?? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
"Still, it is worth pointing out that, at every stage, the models used by public health
agencies exaggerated the numbers of infections and of deaths. Indeed, it may well be that, once again, the lockdown will come into effect only after the peak in new infections has passed. Why do our leaders keep falling for it? Because, I’m afraid, all the incentives are stacked one way. No politician ever gets into trouble for erring on the side of caution. Nor does any public health adviser. No one has ever been hounded from office for spending too much on test and trace, or for imposing restrictions that had little effect, or for making predictions that were excessively alarmist. Make the slightest slip the other way, though, and you’re finished." https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...boris-dont-do/ |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.