Originally Posted by Mifletz (Post 4072022)

Is there any way Tabak could plead "guilty" and thereby avoid a trial? Or is there so much money involved, that his own lawyers won't let him? Or could the holding officers do a "Fred West" on him ie give him a belt to hang himself before the trial, and even help him along?!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/65000/...d_west_150.jpg

Originally Posted by Shasown (Post 4074955)

You do realise that current statistics from the department of justice show that of people remanded in custody to await trial just over 20% of them are later released after charges were dropped or are found innocent at trial?

http://www.straightstatistics.org/ar...other-innocent
http://www.ws3.prisonreform.web.baig...on.asp?id=2125

Another interesting fact is that all people who are remanded into custody are put on suicide watch after an initial medical assessment if they show any signs of neurological disorder? Given that 58% of remanded prisoners do show such signs that is a lot of innocent people put on suicide watch.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datab...-uk-statistics
http://www.mind.org.uk/help/rights_a...justice_system

Being put on suicide watch isnt an indicator of guilt nor is actually attempting or committing suicide as your posts seem to indicate.

Being placed in custody and having all liberty removed as well as the stress of being accused of a crime and potentially being found guilty at trial even though you may be innocent is enough to affect the balance of even the sanest and most honest person's mind.

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4074496)

Certainly touched a nerve with Pyramid who is very "Cerebral" on other sites.

Highly probable that you could be wrong. You have been and with stark regularity up to now so I'd say it was a safe bet that you are wrong!

People of the same ilk as the mutter who murdered Jo are hell bent on defending the suspects? Ahh....... you mean in direct contrast to the way people like you want to hang, draw and quarter anyone (and everyone) that the police take more than a 2nd glance at - without you having been made aware of any hard fast and concrete evidence - happy to label them killers at the drop of a hat!

I'll say it again: we live in a land of innocent until proven guilty - and that applies even to those charges with crimes. Charges can be dropped. Here's something to really blow your mind - it also can apply to those convicted - ever heard of Miscarriage of Justice?
Last edited by Pyramid*; Today at 01:44 AM.
Pyramid* is offline Report Post Reply With Quote


Touched a nerve here again, must have, both posting at that time of night to get a point across. Interseting though.

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4074745)

Why worry about that, quote or multi quote WHY THE PECISION, you have already understood what I said. Then there was Fred West, depressed I expect OR GUILTY.

Oh but we did it at the same time of day. Well that definately makes us of the same ilk as the murderer, eh?
I THINK YOU HAVE COPLETELY TAKEN THIS QUOTE OF CONTEXT. NEVER MIND.

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 4075274)

As for youe assumption (wrong again... do you see the pattern here!) - you think Shasown and I are the one person? Tell you what - go ask the mods. I look happy to you reporting back that you are once again wrong. PMSL.

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4074524)

THE SUN
THE man charged with the murder of Jo Yeates has been placed on suicide watch in prison.

Dutch-born Vincent Tabak is being monitored around the clock at Long Lartin jail, where he is on remand.

Staff at the top-security prison have been told to check the 32-year-old every 30 minutes throughout the day and night.

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4075558)

Oh and just another snipit I know you like them :joker:

Jo Yeates murder accused Vincent Tabak 'feels safe in jail'

by Don Mackay, Daily Mirror 27/01/2011
:hugesmile:

Originally Posted by Shasown (Post 4075614)

Makes me wonder, how you cant see the wood for the trees.

You quote the Sun saying he was in Long Larton Prison, thats in Evesham Worcestershire, its a Cat A (high security), under a suicide watch.

then you quote a mirror article claiming



Gloucester and Bristol Prisons are both Cat B and the most likely locations for remand prisoners to be held.

Incidentally what was the "#" about when you quoted my post where I had challenged your point about "if he was innocent why would he need to be put on suicide watch" - post 651 in this thread?

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4075765)

Yes if you look on other sites you will see that other people have also noticed the differences of these two reports The Sun and The Mirror 27th. I expect there was an overlap in time regarding the reports as he was probably moved the same day therefore it would appear conflicting news but actually it is not.

Originally Posted by Mifletz (Post 4076104)

Although some men can be surprisingly stronger than they may appear (eg Christopher Jeffries), and an adrenaline surge can give a man 30% more strength, and even though he's 6'4", Tabak's average arms looks like he'd have really huffed and puffed moving a 75kg clothed female body, if he did do it singlehanded. And moving a 'deadweight' dead body is considerably more difficult than an unconscious live body.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/...49_306x423.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/...32_306x423.jpg

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4076129)

Err no, once again you have failed to grasp the situation or understand the information available to you.

He was remanded into custody awaiting trial, he was put into Bristol Prison which is a Cat B prison, he didnt feel secure there because he feared there may be local Bristolians amongst the population who would hold a grudge against him, he was then moved to Gloucester another Cat B prison.

Long Larton is a Cat A prison, they dont normally stick prisoners on remand in there, its for serious cons, as in convicted criminals with serious records, those who cause trouble like riots or persistent escapers.

E] Oh dear a slap on the wrist for not grasping it so what are the papers on about. Where is he.

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4075558)

Where on earth was that mentioned that I think you and Shasown are one person, are you hallucinating.

It has been said on this site that you are a troll, I certainly believe that.


Out of sheer interest Marney.
What is PECISION? ;) Have a guess go
on.

Oh and just another snipit I know you like them :joker:

Jo Yeates murder accused Vincent Tabak 'feels safe in jail'

by Don Mackay, Daily Mirror 27/01/2011
:hugesmile:

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4075765)

Yes if you look on other sites you will see that other people have also noticed the differences of these two reports The Sun and The Mirror 27th. I expect there was an overlap in time regarding the reports as he was probably moved the same day therefore it would appear conflicting news but actually it is not.

Originally Posted by Mifletz (Post 4076104)

Although some men can be surprisingly stronger than they may appear (eg Christopher Jeffries), and an adrenaline surge can give a man 30% more strength, and even though he's 6'4", Tabak's average arms looks like he'd have really huffed and puffed moving a 75kg clothed female body, if he did do it singlehanded. And moving a 'deadweight' dead body is considerably more difficult than an unconscious live body.

Originally Posted by Shasown (Post 4075879)

Err no, once again you have failed to grasp the situation or understand the information available to you.

He was remanded into custody awaiting trial, he was put into Bristol Prison which is a Cat B prison, he didnt feel secure there because he feared there may be local Bristolians amongst the population who would hold a grudge against him, he was then moved to Gloucester another Cat B prison.

Long Larton is a Cat A prison, they dont normally stick prisoners on remand in there, its for serious cons, as in convicted criminals with serious records, those who cause trouble like riots or persistent escapers.

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4076129)

E] Oh dear a slap on the wrist for not grasping it so what are the papers on about. Where is he.

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 4076421)

I'd have thought that a lean, fit, 6'4", 32 years old man, even with the build of VT, would have more chance of lifting 75kgs of dead weight, than a 66 year old man of average height who certainly doesn't appear to have the fittest body shape to him. Can't swear on it, but if the comparison is being made VT vs CJ - I'd opt for VT being able to.

Originally Posted by Mifletz (Post 4076444)

Probably.

Though those at the gym where he exercises weekly say that Jeffries is "very strong". And renters from 5 years ago who used to watch him garden, said that he was "stunningly strong".

Both the Englishman & the Dutchman have big strong hands, and asphyxiating the female by hand or by a sock/stocking would pose no problem: once those external carotid arteries are even slightly compressed, unconsciousness and death follow in seconds, poor soul.

Originally Posted by Mifletz (Post 4076444)

Probably.

Though those at the gym where he exercises weekly say that Jeffries is "very strong". And renters from 5 years ago who used to watch him garden, said that he was "stunningly strong".

Both the Englishman & the Dutchman have big strong hands, and asphyxiating the female by hand or by a sock/stocking would pose no problem: once those external carotid arteries are even slightly compressed, unconsciousness and death follow in seconds, poor soul.

Originally Posted by Shasown (Post 4076358)

The answer to that is in my post (and your badly quoted post). I typed it fairly slowly so you would understand it.

Now about the # in your post 651, any answer on that one or are you going to continue to ignore that question?

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 4076363)

I certainly don't find it amusing where did I say that. The poor man should be regarded as a B case prisoner awaiting trial but has infract gone to an A graded prison .I certainly don't find it amusing where did I say that. The poor man should be regarded as a B case prisoner awaiting trial but has infract gone to an A graded prison .

Why you would find it amusing that an incarcerated man is quoted as saying he feels safe in jail, is bizarre to say the least. However, given that your postings are increasingly becoming more of that 'ilk', I shouldn't be surprised.

I see you still fail on the ability to use the quote facility.

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4076578)

Nothing more than a slip of the finger # along with the badly posted comments ?

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4076616)

I certainly don't find it amusing where did I say that. This man should be regarded as a B case prisoner awaiting trial but has infract gone to an A graded prison. I THINK I MAY HAVE USED THE QUOTE BUTTON FACILITY THIS TIME JUST FOR YOU

Originally Posted by marney (Post 4076625)

I certainly don't find it amusing where did I say that. The poor man should be regarded as a B case prisoner awaiting trial but has infract gone to an A graded prison .I certainly don't find it amusing where did I say that. The poor man should be regarded as a B case prisoner awaiting trial but has infract gone to an A graded prison .
The above should be taken out
out of Pyramids post he did not post this comment This has got intertwined with mine my post sorry.