![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Plus the mother laughing ,who does that on camera ?? Very bizarre behaviour. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I haven’t watched this yet. However as a child you are unaware of what is happening and wether it’s right or wrong.
We have youth players back in the 70’s who were abused at an age where they knew what was right and what was wrong..but if they complained they were threatened with an end to their career and only now do we hear of their abuse. The parents were probably awestruck allowing their kids to stay overnight with MJ...as for the kids they were vulnerable and innocent. Being abused by such powerful people..worshipped by many because of what they can do, just trapped so many people and made the abuse so much harder to report. We are all so different...we all deal with things differently and a lot of strength lies in any individual who had the courage to report the abuse with so much to lose...sportsmen and women..actors and actresses. However not everyone has that courage at the time. I know one of them swore on oath he wasn’t abused but now states he was...maybe whilst MJ was alive he still had this power over him..:shrug: |
Quote:
|
And i hate how people use the excuse of "ohh well paedophiles don't abuse all kids" :facepalm: and "culkin was already famous" , if he was soo close to Maculay Culkin & Brett Barnes then surely something inappropriate would of happened?? .
I know predators don't abuse all kids , but surely they'd still be signs of grooming ?? and Culkin & Barnes spent ALOT of time with MJ so surely they would of seen evidence themselves that something very weird & wrong is going on??? . wade robson and james safechuck claim he "moved onto other boys" aka Culkin & Barnes which implies MJ was abusing Culkin & Barnes yet Culkin & Barnes was never abused and they've always stood by MJ , there wasn't anything inappropriate going on with either of them . So why are we suppose to take Robson & Safechuck's word as gospel? :suspect: and why do Culkin & Barne's words not matter anymore ?? . Culkin has had alot of issues regarding addiction and family life , he pretty much stated his own dad was abusive to him . So why would he say his dad is abusive but cover for MJ ?. I don't think Culkin would protect MJ unless he genuinely knew & felt he was innocent . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No.passion, no emotion.....hmmmmmm. ..I wonder who stole that from them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is a clear pattern between those that get abused keeping their abuse a secret and covering for the abuser. |
All in all a depressing watch but of course now looking back it all adds up
utterly disgusting and as for the 2 mothers? well words fail me |
Quote:
They enjoyed the Luxury of it all. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now, they say, telling all with the unpleasant details. With no emotion or passion at all. Like reading from a prepared script, you get more passion from a newsreader reading the news. The relief of being able to now reveal their story, particularly as to the abuse the allege took place. Should have opened up loads of emotion. A bit of anger at what happened, had it been true, would have surfaced. They came across as robotic as the first night. I doubt passion and emotion has been robbed from them. I'd bet probably plenty of emotion and passion came forward when the court threw out their claim on the Jackson estate. I'd like to see any footage of when they got that news. If they lose this appeal coming up soon now after this documentary. I'd again bet probably, passion and emotion would surface. Since their gambling of having this documentary done at this time only, would have failed in the purpose they, (in my view), had for it to help secure hopeful success for money from the Jackson estate. I feel as sure as I can be, there'd be probably lots of passion, emotion and anger, if we could see it then. I watched them in both nights of this documentary. Very closely. They came across as mixing truth and an invention of lies, to cloud the issue It's a clever process but things have to add up. For me, therein was the problem, things didn't add up. There was no change of tone, nothing, just like they were reading notes. Yet this is an issue they were attempting to present that has affected their lives right up to now. For me that attempt failed and rather badly too. No way would I trust these 2 as believable or trustworthy and likely never as reliable witnesses. |
Sad how desperate some people are for money.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They come across as anxious, bewildered and deeply, deeply sad to plenty of us. You might not be able to see it; but you need to stop stating emphatically that they do it "with no emotion" and realise that that's just your own observation and not a universal truth. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.