JK Rowling called Khelif "Trans?"

That is out of order.

i've seen her live now, watched last nights semi final match vs the thai lady


she is very much 100% a woman, honestly i would know if someone is trans or not, considering i like quite some trans people



but no, Imane is 100% a woman, she gives me Lucia Rijker vibes, like a lot


another dominant performance from her, i agree with the commentators, she is a definite contender for the gold

She called her male. Which she is, biologically.

It always amuses me that on threatening trans women or biological men in women's sport, the loudest, and most prolific, the most outraged posters in support of them are men.

My Dream Wife
 

https://nypost.com/wp-content/upload...104.jpg?w=1024

:lovedup:


we both have in common, that we are both being discriminated against by the western elites

everyone who thinks of her as trans, is cancelled for me personally

:idc:


Don't Believe Evil Russian Pig Umar Kremlev's Lies, pretty sure Kremlev has ties to Putin, all of those russian leaders have tbf, and the IBA basically ignore that and he gets to stay on as president, corruption within IBA that more needs highlighting honestly

My goodness you are so desperate to be right you will quote the Sun ...some Liverpool Supporter you are, interesting how they landed on JK when there are ex male boxers saying it is not right ...mysogny at its finest


get back the privet drive...what does that even mean, is it like a get back into the kitchen kind of thing?

[QUOTE=Nicky91;11490859]https://nypost.com/wp-content/upload...104.jpg?w=1024

:lovedup:


we both have in common, that we are both being discriminated against by the western elites[/QUOTE]


oh Nicky :joker: never change

Pricey Drive is where the tearful Dursleys lived. Come on Cherie, are you not up on your Harry Potter?

[QUOTE=Cherie;11490872]It's his ideal wife, apparently. A match made in heaven...

ah....no never a HP fan.....okay so its mind your own business .....how nice of them to be able to opnine but no one else can

It was written by the associate editor, who is also a female.

It's not about me being right, Cherie, because I already believe I am right (as you believe you are right, or anyone else believes they are right. No one goes through life believing they are wrong about everything. No one.). By posting this, I'm trying to highlight exactly how far gone and dangerous this far right affiliated movement has shifted. JK is not the concerned citizen you believe. She's a dangerous radical. Look at how aggrieved you feel, just because Joanne has being called out, with accusations about me, and about misogyny...

I've spoken about that rag numerous times on here and about what they did, and that's why i acknowledged it myself, so that attack falls flat, I'm afraid. An extremist paper calling out another extremist is the only way to show it. If I'd posted a guardian journo, or a morning star journo, it doesn't have anywhere near the same impact.

You're the 3rd person to try the "you just want to be right" line on me, so you're not even original. SB (in the TS days) was first, niamh was second, and now you're backwash at this stage.

Privet Drive that should have said, dammit...

[QUOTE=The Slim Reaper;11490887]It was written by the associate editor, who is also a female.

It's not about me being right, Cherie, because I already believe I am right (as you believe you are right, or anyone else believes they are right. No one goes through life believing they are wrong about everything. No one.). By posting this, I'm trying to highlight exactly how far gone and dangerous this far right affiliated movement has shifted. JK is not the concerned citizen you believe. She's a dangerous radical. Look at how aggrieved you feel, just because Joanne has being called out, with accusations about me, and about misogyny...

I've spoken about that rag numerous times on here and about what they did, and that's why i acknowledged it myself, so that attack falls flat, I'm afraid. An extremist paper calling out another extremist is the only way to show it. If I'd posted a guardian journo, or a morning star journo, it doesn't have anywhere near the same impact.

You're the 3rd person to try the "you just want to be right" line on me, so you're not even original. SB (in the TS days) was first, niamh was second, and now you're backwash at this stage.[/QUOTE]

well fortunately for me Slim, I didn't see those posts or when they were posted but it must be going back some as TS has not been TS or a long time, so in my mind I am first, nice to see I am not on my own though, with regard to the associate Editor females can hate other females as well you know, as for you acknowledging it yourself, that doesn't take away from the fact that you posted it, and now you cant take it back I am afraid ....oh I would never normally quote x but here it is anyway because I desperately need to make a point ..for shame :nono:

Nope. Wrong again

TS lives on Cherie. In my heart.

In all our hearts.

…at one with the universe…

https://static.boredpanda.com/blog/w...abramson-4.jpg

Toy Soldier Never Forgotten

How are you being discriminated against by the western elites?:laugh:

super friday for me tomorrow


my team NAC Breda kick off the eredivisie season in Groningen, and after that, i can tune in to root for Imane for the gold medal match

:cool:

Alesser-known fact about Daley Thompson is that he is not merely Britain’s finest ever Olympian, but a crucial figure in agitating against the injustice of biological males competing in women’s sport. Long before these Paris Games were scandalised by sex tests revealing two boxers as having XY chromosomes, the male pattern, he was warning of the gathering storm. Quite apart from featuring in a campaign film last year called The Inclusion Delusion, he wrote in a report by think tank Policy Exchange: “We risk alienating a generation of female athletes if we cannot promise them fair and safe play – from the grassroots to the top.”

t 66, Thompson could be forgiven for ducking the toxic blowback this debate unleashes. And yet he feels strongly enough to rebuke the International Olympic Committee for neglecting to protect the female category, prioritising inclusion over fairness. As an illustration, he points to the 33-page “Portrayal Guidelines” document that the IOC have issued to journalists in Paris, advising against the use of such terms as “born male” or “biologically male” on the grounds that such labels are “dehumanising” and constitute “problematic language”.

“You only have to read the statement,” he says. “I don’t understand why they, as the world governing body, don’t take a stance. Instead, they tell everybody else to take a stance and then they chip away at the sides. I don’t understand that.”

I point out how Martina Navratilova, the nine-time Wimbledon champion and a steadfast figure in upholding the integrity of female sport, has accused the IOC of Orwellian tactics by waging a “1984 version of war on women”. “Martina knows this inside out,” Thompson nods. “I would agree with that. I would have thought that the defence of women’s sport should be very high on the IOC’s list.”

Sadly, it is anything but. In their insistence that womanhood can be determined by passport status alone, the IOC have created the astonishing situation where two biologically male boxers, Algeria’s Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan, are now guaranteed Olympic medals in the women’s competition. They were disqualified from last year’s world boxing championship by the International Boxing Association, who said the DNA of each fighter “was that of a male consisting of XY chromosomes”. Neither appealed against the findings.

I meet Thompson at the Royal Garden Hotel in Kensington, before the eruption of the boxing scandal. But he leaves no doubt as to his views on the IOC’s spinelessness, presenting their failure to ensure a level playing field for women as an extension of their feeble stance on state-sponsored doping. “The IOC, in their different forms over the last 40 or 50 years, have been negligent in their duty towards the one thing they should be looking after, and that’s sport,” he argues. “They allowed the Eastern bloc countries to get away with it in the Seventies and Eighties. They could have done things about China. They could have done more. They should have done more.”

Having seen the convulsions triggered by the IOC’s gospel of inclusion at all costs, Thompson suggests his great friend Sebastian Coe as the ideal candidate to lead the Olympic movement once Thomas Bach steps down next year. Unlike Bach, Coe has shown decisive leadership on the most vexed of questions. In the women’s 800 metre final at the Rio Olympics in 2016, Caster Semenya took gold in a race where all three medallists had differences in sexual development. In response, Coe introduced a policy where any such athletes would have to reduce their testosterone levels to race as women.

“He would make a good president of the IOC, because I truly believe he has the athletes’ interests at heart,” Thompson says. “He does the things he thinks will be beneficial to them. Plus, he has had issues that nobody else has had to deal with. And he seems to have found a good way through them.”

Thompson has been drawn into his febrile sphere through his enduring bond with Sharron Davies. They dated briefly in the late Seventies and have remained friends ever since, with Davies persuading him to champion the cause closest to her heart. While Thompson took Olympic decathlon gold in Moscow in 1980, Davies had to settle for silver in swimming’s 400m individual medley – beaten by Petra Schneider of the former East Germany, who later admitted to having doped. For her, the spectacle of women being wrongly denied medals cuts deep. Fortunately, her ex-boyfriend has not taken much persuading to lend his support

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainm...4d03f99f&ei=15

No matter where you stand on this issue, I think everyone will appreciate this.