ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Soaps (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=554)
-   -   The Hollyoaks thread! (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=131808)

'Conor 03-01-2011 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc. (Post 4032351)
Right.. I don't often watch this but I watched bits of the episode when India got 'dun in'

Did they find her body etc.?

yeah Duncan & Jack found her body last week, and her sister Texas nd her mum identified her body.

'Conor 03-01-2011 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkerThanMoses (Post 4032284)
:( I like ricky

hes definitly my least favourite character in the show.

Marc 03-01-2011 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Conor (Post 4032355)
yeah Duncan & Jack found her body last week, and her sister Texas nd her mum identified her body.

Texas AND India.. jeez these names be silly!

She deserved to die for having a stupid name.. :rolleyes:

'Conor 03-01-2011 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc. (Post 4032385)
Texas AND India.. jeez these names be silly!

She deserved to die for having a stupid name.. :rolleyes:

:nono: her death was HORRIBLE and he just dumped her body in the woods as if she was litter, it was horrible to watch.

Marc 03-01-2011 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Conor (Post 4032396)
:nono: her death was HORRIBLE and he just dumped her body in the woods as if she was litter, it was horrible to watch.

She'll get over it.

'Conor 03-01-2011 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc. (Post 4032411)
She'll get over it.

shes dead ? :joker: how will she get over it :joker:

'Conor 03-01-2011 06:58 PM

Marc does have a point thought, who comes up with the names of the characters seriously?

India, Texas, Melody, Silas, Liberty? like come on :joker:

Visage 03-01-2011 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkerThanMoses (Post 4032284)
:( I like ricky

I like him too.

He reminds me of Tom Baker

http://www.e4.com/images/mb/E4/HOLLY.../ricky_reg.jpg

http://www.fanboy.com/wp-content/upl...er-400x430.jpg

Marsh. 04-01-2011 12:01 AM

And Mitzeee (with 3 e's). You can tell the executive producer used to make Footballer's Wives.

'Conor 04-01-2011 12:04 AM

So who do you think is the "suprise return" for the 3000th episode?

'Conor 04-01-2011 12:19 AM

MUST READ


DrunkerThanMoses 04-01-2011 09:14 AM

Intresting, some good plots but also some very boring plots.

Im starting to like crazy leeanne, hopefully she will go all glen close from fatal attraction on lee and amy :)

Suzanne plot looks stupid, but I like the character so im glad shes back.

I liked Gaz he was a good character so hoprfully he will make life hell for anita

Other than that im bored of ste and bredan so...

Marsh. 04-01-2011 05:18 PM

Never liked the Brendan and Ste storyline, Ste's always irritated me. It made me laugh when we were supposed to believe he was a wife beater when you could flick him over.
Hopefully they don't follow in EastEnders footsteps and have too many babies; the majority of the female cast have babies. I think they've done the stranger living in the attic before too?
And who is Kyle?

Marsh. 04-01-2011 05:18 PM

Never liked the Brendan and Ste storyline, Ste's always irritated me. It made me laugh when we were supposed to believe he was a wife beater when you could flick him over.
Hopefully they don't follow in EastEnders footsteps and have too many babies; the majority of the female cast have babies. I think they've done the stranger living in the attic before too?
And who is Kyle?

bbfan1991 04-01-2011 05:51 PM

Hollyoaks has undergone massive changes in the past 12 months as new producer Paul Marquess has steered a significant revamp of the soap, writing out a number of characters, introducing new families and creating popular new storylines including Ste and Brendan's dark relationship, Jasmine's transgender struggle and a new serial killer plot. DS recently caught up with Paul for a chat about his work on Hollyoaks to date and what fans can expect from the coming months.

How would you sum up the work you've been doing since you arrived at Hollyoaks 12 months ago?
"I think Channel 4, Lime Pictures and I all felt that it was time to change Hollyoaks a lot - not to change what the essence of the show is, but I felt that there were quite a few characters who were played out, and when I spoke to the actors in question they all agreed. It's a show that's known for its youthful energy, so I just felt that it needed a new injection of energy - it needed new characters and new stories. So we ended up doing an awful lot of changes all at the same time. When you ask people about which characters we should have kept, people often name Steph and Malachy - but Carley [Stenson] and Glenn [Wallace] both wanted to go, so it was their decision and those are characters we could have done more with. And the ones who were written out were played by some really, really good actors in every case, I think - but we just felt that it was time to reinvigorate and re-focus the show. It's been one hell of a year!"

After so much hard work in revamping Hollyoaks, how close are we to seeing the finished product in terms of your vision for the show?
"I've always been very firm about 2011 being the year of consolidation for Hollyoaks. I think we've got the right people in place, I think we've got the right storylines now - and we've got our big serial killer plotline, which will run all the way through 2011. The hard work that we've done in 2010 will really start to pay off in 2011."

Can you name anything that you're particularly proud of from your time at Hollyoaks so far?
"I think that the Brendan and Ste storyline has been fantastic - they're both brilliant and, God, you couldn't have asked for stronger chemistry than what they've got on screen. And what happens with that story in 2011 is that it really opens out - we bring other characters into it. There's a new love interest for Ste, so it turns into a something of a classic triangle. And we really explore not only what Brendan's like, but why he is the way he is. We start to explore what his fundamental problems are. So I wouldn't want to look back and say that we've done the Brendan and Ste storyline - I think it's only just started. I think regular viewers definitely feel the connection between Brendan and Ste - and even if they're apart, it's really, really, really powerful.

"I think the other standout storyline for me - which, again, goes right through 2011 - is the transgender story. I'm really, really proud of that. That came from me saying, 'This is something I don't understand - and therefore I'm interested in it and how we'd tell the story'. And the key was during our research when we met two transgender boys who really humbled us with the hell that they'd gone through to be who they want to be and who they feel they are. That was when we knew why we were telling the story, and we've worked really hard in respecting their experiences and the fact that they shared it with us. And then we've been blessed in having Victoria Atkin, who's just amazing. In under a year, to have the story as strong as it is, I'm really proud of that and I feel really lucky to have put it together like we have."

Out of all the new characters, Brendan has received the strongest reaction by far - has his popularity come as a surprise to you?
"No, because I cast him! (Laughs) When we said that we wanted to bring in Cheryl's brother, Dorothy Andrews who does our casting said, 'I have the actor!' When she said he was from Dublin, I said, 'He can't be from Dublin - she's from Belfast!' But she said that I had to meet him, and he made an impression within about a minute. He was wearing the most mental jeans - they're quite hard to describe, but maybe it was the jeans! (Laughs) Emmett Scanlan is a really, really good actor and a fantastic character in himself. He walked in and got the part, basically. And we changed the story so that Cheryl is from Belfast and Brendan is from Dublin!"

When did you realise Brendan was becoming so popular?
"Always with Hollyoaks, you cast someone and then you wait for what feels like about ten years before you see them on screen. And then the initial reaction wasn't very positive - people thought, 'God, who is this guy?' But I could just feel the reaction turning round - and my family and friends were saying to me, 'God, who is he? He's amazing!' I think with a character like that, you have to hook the audience in with a good story. When the episode aired where he punched Ste for the first time, I think clever viewers started to get it. So it's been a good actor, a good story and he just seems to be very popular. One of my better decisions, as they say!"

Out of the new families you've introduced, which would you say has been the most successful?
"I think it's hard to say as they're all really different. I think the Costellos are probably the most successful because they came in with a lot of story. And when we first saw the Costellos, there was no Jasmine. I'm not for a moment saying that being transgender equals adolescence, but there is something about Jasmine's story that we can all relate to in terms of defining yourself not as your parents define you, but as who you really are. So I think that's a very universal story and a real touchstone for younger viewers. That, plus the Mitzeee story, and Riley going out with Mercedes has made them really plugged into the show.

"I think that the teenage pregnancy story has been really strong for the Sharpes, and I think that the O'Connors are still relatively new - but there's great stuff coming up for Diane and Sinead. The thing with Hollyoaks is that you live and die by your younger characters, and I think that Sinead will be really central in 2011. And I think you'll see much more of Seth, much more of Riley and much more of the Costellos."

The O'Connor family were quite quiet in terms of storylines after their debut - was there any reason why they had to take a back seat?
"With Hollyoaks, it's normally just the schedule! It's pretty dull! Because we shoot single camera, it takes us about three times as long to shoot as the other soaps. Due to that, I've had to learn how to tell stories on Hollyoaks - it's been quite a learning curve. We do five episodes per week on single camera, and all of our sets are built as real, so there's all sorts of noise issues. It's like three-dimensional chess, storylining Hollyoaks - so if you don't see somebody for a while, that's usually why and it usually means they're about to become really busy!"

What kind of challenges have you faced in the past year?
"It's been new for me to do something that's so focused demographically - that's taken me a while to get my head around. As we sit and beat out stories, it's about ensuring that - for example - the Carl, Mercedes, Riley love triangle is really about Riley and Mercedes. Many of our writers are male and a little bit older, so it's really easy for them to identify with Carl - but actually it's not his story.

"And that's why I think the serial killer story is a perfect Hollyoaks story, because we're playing the serial killer as the bogeyman. It's actually not about him - yes, he's quite interesting because he's killing people - but it's about what Texas feels about it, what Nancy feels about it and which of the young people might be murdered next. So for me, I've had to be really focused on who the show's about and how our stories will resonate with our key demographic. It's not as easy as it sounds, and there are stories that are pitched for Hollyoaks that I would play somewhere else, but I'd say no to here for that reason."

You've injected the fun back into Hollyoaks but also explored some quite dark topics like the domestic abuse, Jasmine's self-harm and the new serial killer storyline - can we expect more dark plotlines to come?
"I think there has to be a balance. There's lots of things that we wouldn't do, and when we do come up with a murder story, we try to think quite hard about why that's a Hollyoaks story. So the serial killer storyline is about someone who's picking off young girls - it started as a stranger danger story, which is absolutely key Hollyoaks territory, and I was slightly surprised that we hadn't done something as big about stranger danger on the internet before, or at least recently.

"There's also plenty of comedy in 2011 - there's some really funny McQueen stuff coming up and some great Lee and Leanne stuff. Leanne is fast becoming one of my favourite characters - she turns into a real bunny boiler in 2011 and does terrible things to poor old Amy. The other thing that we'll be playing a lot of in 2011 is first love - classic teen love stories that are absolutely at the heart of Hollyoaks and ought to be - and perhaps there wasn't enough of them in 2010. I've been pushing the story team to focus on a really sweet love triangle we've got going on in 2011 with really cool characters."

The fans recently noticed that some changes had been made to episodes at the last minute - looking back, do you think that was the right thing to do?
"Absolutely. Hollyoaks is made by an independent production company and we reserve the right to make the episodes as good as they possibly can be. If you've got a good idea, why not just do it? I think the main irritation for people was that the spoilers were wrong and some of the billings were wrong, and I know that's a pain. But I think what's been on screen has been really exciting. It's something that we reserve the right to do, but we'll only do it if we think it will make your viewing experience better - at the end of the day, that's all that matters. It was just a couple of things where we thought an idea was too good not to do, and just saying, 'Well, it's all shot' wasn't a reason not to change it."

What do you think about the viewing figures at the moment? Do you have a target for where you'd like them to be?
"We never have that discussion, because the demographic is as important to Channel 4 as the actual figure. I think that they've consolidated and, of course, we'd like them to go up. We feel very strongly that we've got some big, meaty long-running stories coming up in 2011 that should gradually drive people to the show. The feedback for Hollyoaks has definitely changed - it's so much more positive now. People are talking about the stories and talking about the characters - not just being negative about the show. That was always the job, what I call the word of mouth effect. 2010 was about word of mouth, and 2011 is about really building on that goodwill and pulling in new viewers. I think we're on plan."

A number of the students have left, like Kevin, Charlotte and India - will we see new students come in to take their places?
"Well, we've got Doug coming back - we liked him a lot. He was only a character for a week, but we thought he was great and he brought a very different flavour. We'll have a new batch of students coming into the show in September or October, but we haven't even thought about who they are yet. We've still got Lee, Leanne, Texas and Darren - so we've got a few students around. And I just want to put the record straight that Amy who played Charlotte wanted to go, because I think a lot of people were really angry with me for 'axing' Charlotte - which I didn't! She wanted to go off and write, so that's why she fell off an arch!"

Would you ever do a live episode of Hollyoaks?
"We are talking about something that is sort of live, but it probably wouldn't be until 2012 and it's very, very different from what anyone's done before. It's actually more ambitious. But it's so ambitious that I don't think I can fit it into 2011, as it needs so much planning. It would be a Hollyoaks Live that would involve the audience in a way that no-one else has done."

Does the aftermath of the Il Gnosh fire pave the way for new sets?
"Yes, Tony is about to open his new spa - which is very, very cool, trendy and smart. But he won't own it for long, because a certain millionairess comes back to the village, buys it off him and makes his life a misery! That is, of course, Cindy. So she'll be back as the rich bitch."

What's next for Rhys and Jacqui?
"Well, they have got the biggest story for the first half of 2011. I think it may be one of the biggest stories in Hollyoaks history. It's very, very serious and I think it will really divide the audience. It will really test them and their relationship to the nth degree, and we'll see whether they can recover from it. For the first half of 2011, it's the big story."

Can you tell us anything about Warren's future?
"I'm really excited about Warren's return. I know what's coming up - and the other really big story for 2011 is Warren versus Brendan. It's the battle of the titans and it goes in some very unexpected directions. One month Warren is up, and the next month Brendan is up! But then they end up having to work together. It's interesting, because we all love the character of Brendan, but I felt there was a danger that his stories would be all about sexuality - and the minute you bring Warren into the show, it becomes about something else. It actually becomes about masculinity. I don't want to give too much away, but at some point Warren will find out that Brendan is gay, and then it's about whether that makes Brendan less of a man than Warren is. Watch this space because it's going to be explosive."

What will Mitzeee be up to in 2011?
"There's lots of stuff for Mitzeee in 2011 with Brendan and with Warren, so she'll be right at the heart of all that. We love her - she's one of those characters who, when I suggested her, people were looking at me like I was nuts! But I remember saying that we just needed to get the right actress, and boy, did we get the right actress! If anything, we didn't have enough Mitzeee in 2010 and I think she should be a face of Hollyoaks in 2011, because she's just spot on."

And what's coming up for Lee?
"What we want to do this year is to have Lee at the centre of this very serious story where Leanne is doing terrible things to Amy, but it's still funny. That's would be the ideal. We all know that Alex Carter is better than just having the daft stories in between, so we're really keen to push that this year. Lee is such a great, classic Hollyoaks character and I think we can get even more out of him."

Does that mean Amy will be staying with the show after all?
"Yes!"

Will the aftermath of Calvin's murder continue in 2011, or is that storyline coming to a natural end now?
"It's not coming to an end - Theresa is involved in this quite sweet love triangle and just as she's about to get close to the new detective character Ethan, he finds out what she did. So it'll keep going for a bit longer."

Nancy is a popular character on our forum - will she have more to do anytime soon?
"Nancy has a massive story from the summer right the way through to the autumn. It might be Jess Fox's biggest story ever, which she's very excited about. I think she's great - when I first arrived, I think Nancy's main story was whether she was boring or not, but I felt there was more to do with her. I think we saw in the late-night episodes that if you give her anything to do, she can do it. She can do serious, she can do comedy and she's a very popular character. We'll see more of her."

The Costello brothers also seemed quite quiet for a while - do they have more stories coming up?
"The reason they were quiet was because they were in Hollyoaks Later. They've both got loads coming up, and Riley in particular has got a really good story coming up that's got Warren written all over it!"


Some of the Hollyoaks Later characters like Logan and Sami had quite a positive reaction - would you bring any of them over to the main show?
"We don't have any plans at the moment. We thought that it worked for what it was, and we're a bit full! I think there's been an awful lot of new characters in Hollyoaks in the past year - we needed to just settle it down a bit."

That has been one main criticism from some quarters - too many characters introduced at once - what's your take on it?
"Well, the day when I get everything right, I'll give up! (Laughs) But I look back and I don't think we had much choice, and we're starting to see people's perceptions of the new characters change. Brendan and Mitzeee now feel like they've been in the show for a long time, and so do the Costellos. Bart also feels like he's been in the McQueens forever and he's got some really funny stuff coming up. I'm a soap viewer myself so I know what it's like - you think, 'Who are these people?' But I think we sat down and said that we needed a big shot in the arm, and that's what we've done. I know it's a big ask for the audience, and I'm now the person who's saying, 'We've got our cast - let's play them rather than carry on bringing in new people'."

It can be difficult to give fans an element of surprise on a soap, but you've pulled that off quite a few times lately - will we see more of that?
"Yeah, we've been having a good old think about our whole strategy when it comes to press and publicity, and what we give away and what we don't. We're in the middle of a big rethink about the way we tell our audience about the show."

You've embraced the old characters by bringing back Lee, Warren and Mandy - are any other returns on the cards?
"We've got one more person who we quite fancy bringing back, who would be a big character. It's just whether we think we've got the right story and if it's the right moment. So there'll possibly be another one."

Finally, is there anything else you'd like to tell us about Hollyoaks?
"I think we've covered most of it! I think 2011 is about being entertaining and there'll be lots of fun in there, but also big, strong driving stories. The transgender story drives all the way through the year, we've got this massive Rhys and Jacqui storyline, and the serial killer story. I know what the ending of the serial killer story will be, when it is, and I know how brilliant it is. I'm hoping that story will have the audience jumping up and down and shouting at the telly, because it's got a really big 'look behind you' element to it. In between that, we've got some really nice teen love. That's the Hollyoaks blend!"

Some exciting things coming up:), Hollyoaks Live idea sounds fab:D.

bbfan1991 04-01-2011 05:53 PM

Anita is listed to be leaving in Inside Soap:(, I hope it's just temporary and that she comes back. Eva and Anita were supposed to be leaving after Ravi left then returning but Eva is now in this Rob storyline and maybe Gaz scares Anita off but I like her and she is much more likeable now...

'Conor 04-01-2011 06:14 PM

i really hope Anita dosen't leave, i actually like her now! I could think of 20 characters I would rather see go than her, and that means her mam is gonna go to :(

Marsh. 04-01-2011 07:01 PM

Didn't Anita's mum quit the show but then come back again a couple of months later when her footballer husband decided not to move away.

Anyway, been hating most of his work but:

Quote:

"Yes, Tony is about to open his new spa - which is very, very cool, trendy and smart. But he won't own it for long, because a certain millionairess comes back to the village, buys it off him and makes his life a misery! That is, of course, Cindy. So she'll be back as the rich bitch."
Quote:

What's next for Rhys and Jacqui?
"Well, they have got the biggest story for the first half of 2011. I think it may be one of the biggest stories in Hollyoaks history. It's very, very serious and I think it will really divide the audience. It will really test them and their relationship to the nth degree, and we'll see whether they can recover from it. For the first half of 2011, it's the big story."
Quote:

There's lots of stuff for Mitzeee in 2011 with Brendan and with Warren, so she'll be right at the heart of all that. We love her - she's one of those characters who, when I suggested her, people were looking at me like I was nuts! But I remember saying that we just needed to get the right actress, and boy, did we get the right actress! If anything, we didn't have enough Mitzeee in 2010 and I think she should be a face of Hollyoaks in 2011, because she's just spot on."
Quote:

"Nancy has a massive story from the summer right the way through to the autumn. It might be Jess Fox's biggest story ever, which she's very excited about. I think she's great - when I first arrived, I think Nancy's main story was whether she was boring or not, but I felt there was more to do with her. I think we saw in the late-night episodes that if you give her anything to do, she can do it. She can do serious, she can do comedy and she's a very popular character. We'll see more of her."
Quote:

we've been having a good old think about our whole strategy when it comes to press and publicity, and what we give away and what we don't. We're in the middle of a big rethink about the way we tell our audience about the show."
This all sounds great. Hollyoaks Live sounds interesting. Don't see how they'd do it if they shoot single camera.

Really wish Warren and Brendan would bore off though.

'Conor 04-01-2011 07:13 PM

I have a feeling Anita & Eva's departure is temporary?

InOne 04-01-2011 07:29 PM

Is PC 12 year old plod just a filler then? And he better randomly vanish :nono:

It's brutal how the Sharpes were carted off in a taxi and are now no more, needed to happen though :joker:

'Conor 04-01-2011 07:32 PM

Yeah they needed to happen, all i hope now is that Ricky is murdered and Gaz & Doug dont come back, then i would be 100% happy :D

So Tom
Spoiler:

attacks a burgular who has been living in their attack in the 3000th episode, speculation that its Claire or Louise or Mandy as it is female, but i dont think its Mandy as its a characters thats returning.
should be good

Braden 04-01-2011 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'conor (Post 4034087)
yeah they needed to happen, all i hope now is that ricky is murdered and gaz & doug dont come back, then i would be 100% happy :d

so tom
Spoiler:

attacks a burgular who has been living in their attack in the 3000th episode, speculation that its claire or louise or mandy as it is female, but i dont think its mandy as its a characters thats returning.
should be good

loretttaaa!!!

'Conor 04-01-2011 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braden (Post 4034092)
loretttaaa!!!

she was axed so i doubt it.

bbfan1991 04-01-2011 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Conor (Post 4034058)
I have a feeling Anita & Eva's departure is temporary?

Eva's apparently not leaving now as i've said in the post before they were both meant to go and come back when Ravi left but due to this re-edit Eva is sticking around because there's more to come from her and Gaz's return makes Anita question her future in the village;).

I think she'll return and I did hear rumours she Amy and Eva would be added to the credits too?

Marsh. 04-01-2011 08:04 PM

It would be the best thing ever if it was Louise or Claire but unfortunately I don't think so.
Bit ironic considering Jack hid out in the attic when he faked his death.

bbfan1991 04-01-2011 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 08marsh (Post 4034150)
It would be the best thing ever if it was Louise or Claire but unfortunately I don't think so.
Bit ironic considering Jack hid out in the attic when he faked his death.

It'll probably be Ruth at this rate:joker:.

I would love it if it was Clare or Louise, maybe even Jude Cunningham or Lisa Hunter/Izzy Davies.

InOne 04-01-2011 08:17 PM

I only just noticed this today but they've toned the opening titles down again which is good lol Almost sounds like the old ones!

bbfan1991 04-01-2011 08:23 PM

I was disappointed when Charlotte left but glad that it got confirmed that the actress quit as some thought they had axed her:p.

Marsh. 04-01-2011 08:28 PM

Ruth? Please god no.
You just brought back memories of an open top bus when you put Izzy.

Jords 04-01-2011 09:31 PM

Theresa is so stupid. :laugh:
Almost thought she was gonna spill on +1!

'Conor 05-01-2011 12:45 AM

Awh bless Liberty, she cant act to save her life :joker:

DrunkerThanMoses 05-01-2011 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Conor (Post 4034058)
I have a feeling Anita & Eva's departure is temporary?

Hopefully, Evas had me in stiches this week :joker: Anita is okay as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bbfan1991 (Post 4034174)
I was disappointed when Charlotte left but glad that it got confirmed that the actress quit as some thought they had axed her:p.

I love charlotte :( Im hoping its her living in the attic :joker:

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Conor (Post 4034538)
Awh bless Liberty, she cant act to save her life :joker:

She was much better yesterday in that burger place

InOne 05-01-2011 09:16 AM

Liberty can't act, neither can Texas and her Mum! Jesus, Texas really can't portray emotion at all lol And the 12 year old copper is shyte too

DrunkerThanMoses 05-01-2011 09:30 AM

The 12 year old copper is a joke.

What happened to Logan? Now he was a good copper and not a bad actor

InOne 05-01-2011 09:33 AM

Dunno, yeah he was good! The only problem with having a copper in a soap is they have to feature in almost every crime, which is really unrealistic, also a detective will have more important things to do than to teach a girl how to practice giving evidence!

Visage 05-01-2011 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrunkerThanMoses (Post 4034778)
The 12 year old copper is a joke.

What happened to Logan? Now he was a good copper and not a bad actor

He was part of Later and I think they announced they had enough new characters already this past 6 months.

Quote:

Originally Posted by InOne (Post 4034780)
Dunno, yeah he was good! The only problem with having a copper in a soap is they have to feature in almost every crime, which is really unrealistic, also a detective will have more important things to do than to teach a girl how to practice giving evidence!

I agree it's silly having him involved in every crime that's going on there.

As for preparing Theresa for her court appearance, I thought he was manipulating his position to get closer to the McQueen's, or simply closer to Theresa

Visage 05-01-2011 05:05 PM

Something that has puzzled me lately is India's murder. We've seen Texas grieve for the loss of her sister, but nothing in terms of how she was murdered.

There's been no real investigation and no talk at all of this Cameron who was the one she was supposed to be meeting. Hollyoaks talked about the dangers of on-line dating and did this so well during the build up, but since then nothing has been said on the subject.


Unless I fell asleep and missed it altogether..

Marsh. 05-01-2011 06:40 PM

That's true. Did Texas and Nancy not automatically mention to the police that she was meeting someone from an online chat room? Missed a bit of vital evidence there lol

Marsh. 05-01-2011 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Conor (Post 4034538)
Awh bless Liberty, she cant act to save her life :joker:

It made me laugh when the producer mentioned inviting the actress in to audition for the show and she "impressed everyone with her talents" lol. If that's not proof that all you need is good looks for a part in Hollyoaks, I don't know what is.

Fetch The Bolt Cutters 05-01-2011 06:44 PM

eva is so frickin awesome :amazed: (+1)


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.