managed to watch the first 2 episodes for free but I can't find the rest unless I pay for a dailywire sub which I'm not going to do, shame because it was good

"Cleared of charges" does not mean "proven innocent".

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/01...6709846150.jpg

[Disgraced Russell Brand speaks for the first time
to deny multiple rape allegations calling them
'a painful, hurtful attack' during Tucker Carlson
interview where he reveals
his 12-week-old baby was having heart
surgery when the accusations first surfaced]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ead-curve.html


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/01...6716205144.jpg

The question is
Is there enough evidence to gain a prosecution

And does he have too many fans to risk "reasonable doubt" being given too much reason?

(If that makes sense)

He's now been charged with one count each of rape, indecent assault and oral rape as well as two counts of sexual assault.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...-brand-charged

He is in America

https://video.dailymail.co.uk/previe...8234887916.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-assaults.html

Yes, a Ch5HDnews report.


Nothing new

Charlie Kirk:

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images...2J_400x400.jpg


Every single allegation against Russell Brand concerns events that took place
twenty years ago or more. None of them existed while he was a famous
actor or comedian. All of them emerged once he became a highly visible
dissident on politics and Covid.

Brand has been forthright about his behavior as a young man, but the idea
he was a serial rapist is absurd and, more importantly, completely unprovable.

This is a political prosecution, plain and simple.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gns3w3mb...jpg&name=small


https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1908180278537072909

A stand up comedian did a joke the other day
Why do these women wait 20 years
The answer is , he didn’t have any money then .

There are plenty of reasons women don't come forward.

Indeed
But unfortunately not all women tell the truth

He is due to appear in the London court
on the 2nd of May.


Brand at this time,
working in the USA

i don't have a clue if he did something wrong or not. I don't like the guy, but that doesn't make him guilty. If there is actual evidence against him, then let it come out in court and let the jury decide. That's what it's there for

That's why he is happy to be in
Westminster Court
as it is His Word
against her Word

He stated that
Yesterday in a video link

I agree with Charlie Kirk about the reason as to why all of this has started coming to light.

But it still doesn't change the fact that Russell Brand might've committed criminal offenses.

Yes..I feel the same way.

He's been charged, why are people going on about it being "women after money"? It's not a civil case, investigators feel theres sufficient evidence to pursue criminal charges. That's not very common when it comes to allegations of sexual assault so they must have more evidence than "his word against theirs".