Diane needs to interact with more characters and not being stuck to that house all the time:D.

i remember in her 1st scene she was talking to Steph in MOBS

It seems only a few people seem to care about the murder. And the 12 detective has simply moved on it seems!! lol And if you were Texas, surely you'd be wanting to find out who did it proper bad. Just seems these random bursts of forced emotion from time to time.

And whens India's funeral?

Yeah, they're not even planning anything lol Where even is the body?

i remember when Calvin was murdered, their was like detectives everywhere interrogating people and all for ages !!

Maybe it's to do with the Joanna Yeats thing, they don't want to offend anyone. Real life events always seem to muck up Hollyoaks storylines lol

I can see Liberty being axed or being killed off by Silas, she's awful.

I think it's great that HO are rethinking their press strategy in terms of what spoilers they let out and how to promote the show etc, this will enable them to keep us guessing more and it's good how Warren returning wasn't leaked until Jamie Lomas was spotted arriving at the set- he'd apparently started filming before that:shocked:.

yeah you could be right, doubt it though>?

There is a few that need to go now. Ethans gf, Texas and her mum. And then finally Ethan lol

:nono:

yeah so because they kept Warren under-wraps for so long, i dont see why not the girl returning in the 3000th episode couldnt be Claire or Louise, i honestly think it could be one of them, probably Claire. Alot of people are saying its Mandy, but Mandy is already in the show? Its a girl who's returning, and the only 2 baddies with doors left open are Louise & Claire.

Well I can't see Melody staying around for much longer anyway, and i don't think Texas is that bad i actually like her now, and i don't get all the Ethan hate, i think he's a good actor.

Definetly not Mandy, she'll be returning again anyway and the character they are thinking in bringing back is someone else..

Ethan is meh, would rather they had brought Logan in.

I actually don't mind Melody so far...

:bored:

How funny is Myra though :joker:

Bart: "Didnt You Have The Baby With You?"
Carmel: OH NO (runs)
Myra: "don't worry love, i left you on a bus one new years eve, it happens all the time!!"

I'm glad the O'Connors are getting more time too, sort of reminds me of the old Hollyoaks, all that old family banter stuff

yeah i like the O'Connors (bar Finn), but i want them to mingle with the rest of the cast, i just feel like there house or something is just so far from the village with everyone else.

Spoilers

http://www.e4.com/hollyoaks/episodes...10-14-jan.html

Yeah the arguing is typical LOL:D. I like all 4 of them and they will definetly be more involved this year as PM said...

spoilers sound great for next week.

Intresting to see

:D

Good :amazed: By the way have they changed the girls age? I'm sure she was a year younger than Seth ad Jasmin

Do you mean Sinead? I think the character is supposed to be 15, same age as Jas & Seth.

Anyone noticed there is more older characters now, the mix is much better even if Hollyoaks is a teen soap aimed at the 17-35 demographic:).

I think the show is getting more positive coverage now and people are taking notice, last year was just about spreading words about the revamp. Their could be room for even more improvement and people are still going to be critical about certain things..

I mean poor India being made to have a **** in a car under Lucy Allan's dire era to being murdered when Paul Marquess took over:laugh2:.

Yep, they need to stop random axing people though and get a proper young ones gang together, one that they plan to keep, so they can grow with the soap and that

Ahhh yeah, it's Finn that's the younger one

It all seems rather bizarre, especially when you think how much they invested in the build up to this story.

Last I remember was Nancy writing her piece and trying to go over India's footsteps of that night.

This is odd for Hollyoaks, they usually do so well with character exits.

I won't mention the Sharpes.....

Ahhh forgot about Nancy doing that, she has not been in since then though has she?

no she hasn't

The O'Connor family were quite quiet in terms of storylines after their debut - was there any reason why they had to take a back seat?
"With Hollyoaks, it's normally just the schedule! It's pretty dull! Because we shoot single camera, it takes us about three times as long to shoot as the other soaps. Due to that, I've had to learn how to tell stories on Hollyoaks - it's been quite a learning curve. We do five episodes per week on single camera, and all of our sets are built as real, so there's all sorts of noise issues. It's like three-dimensional chess, storylining Hollyoaks - so if you don't see somebody for a while, that's usually why and it usually means they're about to become really busy!"


A reason why characters sometimes disappear even when their main storyline is the main focus of the show that week, it is frustrating.

Ahhh, so that is why it seems all over the place D: Didn't used to be like that did it? I mean people lose interest in major storylines and I even forget some

yeah ive noticed that since the beginning,

like for instance lets say for example: Tony, Amy, Darren, Nancy, Tom, Gilly, Mandy, Warren were in major storylines for a while, and characters like Carl, Heidi, Anita, Rob, Eva, Diane, Sinead hadlnt been on screen in ages. Then it normally swaps over and Tony, Amy... will be off screen for a while

tonights e4 ep

They need to do a bit more mixing of old and new or the new lot will never develop

yeah true, especially The O'Connors, i think the Costellos have blended in well with them like mixing in with Jack/Warren/Mercedes

Yes jealousy about Carl giving lots of attention to Jason;). What I don't get about Seth is that he is inconsistent:conf:, one minute he's supportive of her and the next he's turning on her.

Probably meant to show he's finding it hard to come to terms with it kinda thing

Tbh the whole Jason/Jasmin thing is annoying me now, that actress always pulls that stupid sullen face in even scene

she looked so much better as a girl :L

yeah she was actually a very pretty girl, if she wore more like make up and girly dresses.