Macie Lightfoot |
05-12-2016 09:32 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by caprimincepie
(Post 9085949)
Re: the editing, I don't think it's been great (I haven't got loads to compare to, only the past few seasons) but I also don't think it's been any worse than usual particularly? There are always people you get to know less than others - maybe because they are not so interesting/relevant to the game or the main events of the season that they want to focus on, it's the same as in Big Brother/TAR or whatever.
Macie you brought up the point of "am I supposed to think Adam is a gamebot or feel sympathetic?" etc, but isn't that the whole point of an edit? It's actually refreshing to see different sides to these people rather than it being shoved in your face about how you're supposed to feel (like it often is on these shows from my experience).
|
I think there's a huge difference between getting to know some people less than others and not getting to know some people at all. I absolutely expect to get to know some people less than others, but I still expect to get to know everyone to a certain degree. I don't feel like I know many people in this cast at all (less than half for sure), and I wouldn't care to see many of them (possibly any of them?) again in a future season.
And as for wondering whether I'm supposed to find Adam annoying as **** or see him as a sympathetic figure, my issue with his edit in particular is that it really isn't crafted well at all in terms of consistency. Adam's whole arc was a narrator at first, then an overload of sympathy when he found his HII bc of his mom, then basically everyone on the island out of nowhere agreeing that he's annoying as ****, and then back to sympathy like nothing happened. That... is not good storytelling at all lol, and it's like the editors are trying to give us severe whiplash with how drastic and spontaneous these changes are. I definitely agree that characters should be presented as multifaceted and conflicted when possible, but it's the editors' job to present it organically. Tai had a similar path of adorable fan favorite to ruthless strategist with a burning desire to win, but his story actually made sense in the context of the season and was edited well. Adam's... was not. Just like how Ken went from golden boy All-American hero to invisibore to someone who is painfully grating to everyone else around him. Ken's negativity at the end of last episode all came without warning, but if the exit interviews are any indication it's not like they didn't have footage from the first few episodes that could've shown this side to him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerseyWinter
(Post 9086400)
Yeah agreed, I was gonna mention this too but forgot. Although I guess they're not doing this with too many characters. I think they're just struggling to fit some people in the edit when certain characters have a lot going on.
Other characters also don't have one-beat personalities either. Just like with Adam, we're getting to see multiple sides of a decent amount of the people actually. We've seen the game side and the drunk side of Bret, we've seen a couple different sides of Jay, Michaela, Ken, David's transformation, etc. They showed more of Rachel than they do with a lot of first boots. Jessica was used as just some kind of wacky character with bulging eyes but I mean she had her air time.
My only real problem with the edit is they're just throwing certain scenarios/people into the mix out of nowhere (like the Sunday/Jessica feud or Will being completely invisible and then just coming out of nowhere). Overall, I don't really think the character development is that far off from other seasons, they just have a couple big characters (or who the show wants to be big) that they're showcasing more.
EDIT: Although even Will being invisible makes sense with the story they're portraying: Will suddenly wanting to be viewed as a player and getting power hungry because he feels like he hasn't been included and making decisions.
|
I'm not really sure what the game side of Bret is still but sure. Michaela I'll give you, Jay kind of, Ken yes and no for reasons outlined above, David sure kind of, but Rachel... lmfao no. I'm trying to think of a first boot more inconsequential than Rachel but I'm seriously struggling. Kourtney from One World I guess? Then I'd have to go back to Fiji? Rachel doesn't even feel like she was on the show and she's actually a perfect of example of the predictability that has plagued this season. She was hidden until we got one scene at camp that's purpose was to make us think "wow, this girl's annoying," and then she was voted off because she was annoying and not included in the initial alliance. I don't think it's humanly possible to have an opinion on Rachel, unless you're one of those people who blindly stans Asian women and was mourning her loss, and then mourned Mari's loss one week later even though she too was a nobody.
|