With regards to WTC7

As pointed out in an earlier link by shasown, it was uncontrolled fire that did for WTC7




Now can we get away from 9/11 conspiracy theories or at least go to another thread, as this was about Bea making pronouncements about Apollo with no knowledge

that is bullsh#t, fire does not make buildings suddenly implode.

Explosions do? funny all the demolitions I have done i always thought things exploded outwards, thank you for putting me, the British Army and the whole of the scientific community straight on that.

i have consperices about the moon landings and 9/11

why havent they landed on the moon after the cold war. its becuse they cant and they faked the moon landing to show american superioty.
9/11 towers that big cant fall in a staright line it would have been controled.

Insult deleted. Seriously I cant be bothered arguing with you anymore, its a waste of time. But you may want to look up what conspiracy theory means. 19 terrorist with box cutters hijacking plans and flying them into buildings is a conspiracy theory.

BTW you better inform the US govt you have solves the WTC7 mystery as it couldn't be explained in the 911 report. Good work!

Edit PS I saw and interview with the most experienced demolitions expert on the planet. After being shown WTC7 he said there is no doubt in his mind it was a controlled demolition.

wtf are you talking about.
you can clearly see that the towers were controlled implosioins.

watch the following video, and tell me it does not look familiar to what happened on 9/11

Wow all that vitriol and drivel simply because I mentioned the Army, I am not have never been nor will ever work for the British Army, I have however worked with them. Far from a limited education I am quite well qualified in my humble opinion.

Now If I was you I would apply the lesson you have hopefully just learned. Do not pick one minor piece of information and base your whole thesis on it, like the rest of the conspuracy buffs, when more information is revealed you look like a tw@t.( a complete and utter idiot, if you think it shows lack of vocabularic knowledge.)

Its not often you are right but you were wrong again.

Those are controlled explosions in a sequence that you can hear.

Compare that video of a demolition with this footage of the collapse from a local tv news crew



Note absence of any initial charges that you need to demolish a building

WTC7 like the twin towers used trusses and once they start going it produces a cascade failure. The fire burned the supports and weakened the structure. To weaken a metal you do not need to get near a melting point as it will accelerate a process we call Creep.

As I said before, Bea did not mention 9/11 so if you must discuss 9/11 can you take this to another thread?

Wow, some sad ****in conspricy twats on this forum

Conspiracy theories :yuk:

Firstly, they just aren't true and they involve a lot of misinformation.

For example on the subject of the moon landings it is obvious that they were real just from listening or reading the astronauts testimonies of their experiences. And from all the photos and film/TV footage taken.

Also, I don't like how these theories always have it that there are supposedly these shady organisations continually working against the public interest. It doesn't matter if it is the US government or reality TV show votes being fixed :D ... seems to me people don't want to face up to things they are in fact sometimes responsible for.

I'd be over the moon if she went this week:bigsmile:

people will believe anything they are told..by the goverment

Many many intelligent people think the moon landing was faked. There have been numerous books, articles and documentaries giving strong reasons to back up this theory.

I personally don't believe it was faked. But it doesn't mean Bea is an idiot. Just sceptical that's all.

Let's face it, she's Einstein compared to the typical BB fodder.

these buildings are designed to colapse inside themselfs.
I see a program about it and it was before the planes hit too..after the bombing.

far too many conspiracy theorists airing their views......please put on your baco-foil helmets and go and sit in a dark room for a while...THEY can't see you there..

looking at the problems and the number of people killed in simply trying to place satellites in low orbit today

I find it questionable that we were able to get to the moon, land, get out, walk around, take off and return to earth, without mishap , 40 years ago!!

also at a time when America was at the height of a game of brinkmanship with the soviet union

Tough sh*t pal-conspiracy theory is the new rock n roll.They'res millions of us and more joining the ranks everyday.

thats just a conspiracy theory about conspiracy theorists believing conspiracy theories ............:puzzled::conf2::puzzled:

Your confusing yourself now-just sayin if you dont like hearing conspiracy theories,tough.Cos your gonna hear alot of them in the future.

but if your a conspiracy theorist defending conspiracy theories put out by conspiracy theorists, how do I know its not a conspiracy theory about conspiracy theorists?

i need my pills..............

Its that brinkmanship that gives the biggest piece of evidence to the moon landings being true.

If the US hadnt put someone on the Moon, and announced they had to the world by live televised feed, wouldnt the Soviet Union have just announced that they were lying?

US: The Eagle has landed

USSR: What on a stage set in.....?

They both had radar trackers to track objects in space, the soviets were able to track the lunar missions both the US and themselves undertook, or have people conveniently overlooked it was a space race between two super powers who were both determined to show they were the better.

Oh let me guess conspiracy nuts, they were in it together, the Cold War didnt exist either, it was all a ploy for the two governments to work together and fool all us idiots who bought their stories?

Am so glad we have you to tell us the truth, even if those foil hats you want us all to wear dont really go with the rest of our clothes.

Remember this site re the moon landings answers all your questions by someone not connected with NASA but knows what they are talking about/

Sad because people have something they believe in and are willing to stand up for what they feel is right? Oh yes, those people are purely sad because they're interested in something you're not. Tunnel vision.

Ignore list. What a plonker....

The moon landings are a hoax..