It hasn't got plenty of support. As usual, you're deluded. Most replies disagree with you. And the ones that do agree with you, are only doing that 'cause they hate Charlie. Hardly validating your deluded point of view.

And what was wrong with Sree? He was a decent and sensitive guy.

What a snob you seem to be. Disliking anyone who is not as articulate as Halfwit....

Freddie didnt 'own' charlie in my opinion.

They were both bad, charlie for not letting freddie tell his side of the story and coming across like a total prick.

And freddie for being all smug about not being evicted again.

Charlie, once again exposed his true self (much like he did in the rodrigo/charlie thing, when he went for him). I love it, all that hard work to make the nation think he was just some good natured cheeky chappie and then he slips up, twice in a few days :thumbs2:

But freddie didnt own him, at all.

Charlie did that, all by himself :tongue:

i won't respond to any of your points except to remind you to respect other forum users ie not calling them a snob. You don't know anything about me.

You may think Sree is decent and sensitive - if you are going to criticise Freddie supporters you have to accept people may criticise other HMs you like.

Very few people liked Sree - that's why he was evicted so early in the show. I personally would say Sree is far from decent and sensitive - he was a narcissist - they are not usually decent and sensitive people.

Rofl i think Freddie was the one who got shut the **** up
GET THE SMUG BASTARD OUT!

The big difference between anti Freddy fan and the ones based on logic is we start with "sure Freddy hasn't done himself any favors" or "He has became cocky of late" whilst those who hate him never acknowledge any wrong doing on the idols part.
Charlie won't win, the mask is off.
Ahmed you gonna spend another £30 quid saving Lisa again?