Exactly spot on :thumbs:

more like you cant accept the fact that those two got the most nominations..and one of them is gone for good on friday! ;)

It does look dodgy, especially the week after something that in hindsight was now obviously engineered to lose poor Hira and save Bea.

Again, nothing to do with who is up, it just stinks. They can't rig the votes so they manipulate the evictions.

I have long suspected this sort of thing and simply do not vote, but that does not make me happier about what is going on.

But Mucus ,freddie and SIavash all broke rules in the dr ,nothing said then was there ? you cannot have one rule for one hm8 and not for another

Again twisting it to other rulebreaks.

I am speaking of rulebreaks REGARDING NOMINATIONS. I didnt realise siavash ahd spoke about nominations, so yeah, he should also be up.

Last week, yea it was **** they changed it to vote to save, but the two people who broke the rules were still up. WHich is my point.

Exactly right, if they had just been fair and put dogface up with bea along with marcus and freddie i wouldnt complain that would be consistant.
But this just stinks the way they have done this saving of bea and dogface :mad:

They got the food took away for that. Unfair on the rest of them, but still being punished for it.

Come on guys, they've obviously chosen to show us Bea and Sophie's nominations talk to raise the hackles a bit, or perhaps to distract from something else that's happening in the house or that might cause viewers to vote a certain way. Sophie is not disliked either in or out of the house so it's fairly safe to use footage of her to get something to happen.

Or, they put it in the show so we'd KNOW she'd done it as a placeholder in case nothing else happened in the run up to nominations. They could then exercise their Sophie option. Like I say, it's safe for them to play this because she's safe either way.

Another thing to think about is that if they've shown us snippets of Sophie and Bea that might only be the tip of the iceberg.

Principle of what?

Since you refuse to answer a straightforward question I can guess your answer. If it had been anyone else you would be pissed...you are just happy because it is them two :wink:

It's not about getting other poeple out, it's about the injustice of punishments and theft from paying fans. If I was a Lisa fan and BB put her up for feck all then I'd be pissed off too at the rigging.

Very correct VickyJ. And what about when Bea and Marcus received the most nominations last week but BB decided to put all HMs up in a vote to save. They should have done the same this week. I hope there is an outcry from the public.

Has op answered my earlier question of his source of all these complaints ? thank you if you have ,but if not can you please answer .....

Im going round in circles. read my previous posts please :rolleyes:

They are letting them off for some unknown reason...I would feel the same if it was ANY other housemates up.

Last week was also dodgy...it makes no sense why they changed it to vote to save.

I'm not trawling through three pages, if you're going to reply indirectly to something I say at least be willing to explain yourself if I ask you to

Who's getting away with what?

i wouldnt actually...its a tv show! ;)

plus your first question wasnt for me...and the question your asking me i dont quite get...if you want me to answer...please explain it more clearer...for give me..my english is not as good as yours

Speculation i think

See that's where you're mistaken, Lisa HAS no fans :whistle:

Id complain if I thought they'd take the slightest bit of notice...:rolleyes:

the point is marcus/freddie fans....


marcus got away with more rule break....(which shoulda caused him getting removed)

and now your complaining cuz hes likely to get evicted.....

OK.

If instead of marcus and freddie getting the most nominations this week...it was lisa and david...or someone you like...and it had been marcus and freddie who had broken the rules regarding NOMINATIONS (nothing else) and they got off with it...you would be annoyed.

Marcus and freddie blatantly talk about noms..BB says they will be punished.

BB then changes the rules so noms can be openly discussed.

Lisa and David recieve the most votes for eviction.

These are the only two who are up. Marcus and freddies rulebreak is overlooked even though we were told they would be punished.

How well would that sit with you?

If lots of people compain, they kinda have to take notice...though i dont know what they could do now

BZZZZZZZZ... wrong.

Marcus has been begging to be evicted for weeks. No real reason to complain about him being up. But considering that Sophie has broken the "no discussing nominations" rule more than any other person in the house... and has yet to really be punished for it, there is cause for dissatisfaction.