ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB10 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=128)
-   -   The Difference Between Sophie Not Nominating And Siavash Not Nominating (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112782)

NettoSuperstar! 19-08-2009 07:26 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by eezamana
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

What a load of cobblers,:nono::nono::nono:

Siavash didnt nominate.

Sophie didnt nominate.

What's the difference?:puzzled::puzzled::puzzled:

They both did exactly the same thing.
Agreed and Sophie says its fairer for all to be up too but noone jumps on her, in the house or on here! They all ******** themselves cos they might be up pahahaha

BB22 19-08-2009 07:43 AM
I fail to see any material difference between Siavash and Sophie in this case. Personally I like Siavash and don't mind Sophie at all but they should simply get their act together and nominate.

Attempts to excuse Sophie while condemning Siavash are feeble, as far as I am concerned.

As far as the reactions in the House are concerned, I would just tell Rodrigo to sod off. His arrogant lecturing about the rules is very, very irritating. And David and Charlie too.

Barbie 19-08-2009 07:50 AM
I think Sophie would have nominated if siavash hadn't said he didn't and BB said they would choose for him, she follows easily

bbisfun 19-08-2009 08:15 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by eezamana
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

What a load of cobblers,:nono::nono::nono:

Siavash didnt nominate.

Sophie didnt nominate.

What's the difference?:puzzled::puzzled::puzzled:

They both did exactly the same thing.
Agreed both muppets dont deserve to win.

camertone 19-08-2009 08:18 AM
get siavash out! he is the biggest hypocrite!
siavash told david not to be mad about bea nominating him.
siavash told david that everybody has to nominate somebody and yet siavash did not nominate anyone!
i cannot believe he's favorite to win!
is british public that gullible?

BJ 19-08-2009 10:29 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Staceee
Quote:
Originally posted by Slothy
Ok so he took himself out of the game. He said that. In that case everyone else can nominate him and get him put up. Thus far they haven't. His argument is; he doesn't want people getting a free ride by dodging nomination he wants the public to decide who they want to be in the final. What he said about Bea earlier was very true - she is the same person as last week, just last week 'that' group had decided it was freddie or Marcus' time. Siavash is very astute as it happens.
But he doesn't make the rules!!!!

Big Brother does! That is the game, who is he to change it?

You have to be liked in the house as well as on the outside to win!
YES:thumbs:

greysky 19-08-2009 11:09 AM
siavash refused to vote because he doesn't want to go up against marcus.. he perfer to put the whole house up to save himself.... it's as simple as that! ....sophie didn't want to nominate because she feel bad for voting david and bea ... those two would have been her nominations .....Siavash and sophie are wrong not to nominate but BB should have made an example of them .... they have not been punish at all so far ! If siavash refuse to nominate again for the 3rd time then BB should tell him he will not be eligable to win.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:53 PM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.