ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Announcements / Suggestions / Help (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Swear Word Filter - Is it necessary? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=125167)

Marc 24-12-2009 10:55 AM

Its just precautionary.

Marc 24-12-2009 10:56 AM

Also.. I'd like to add: Mods can respond to this it'll be the Admins you'll have to refer to and I doubt they'll lift the filter

Captain.Remy 24-12-2009 10:57 AM

There isn't any on the new forum except for fuck right ?

Stu 24-12-2009 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain.Remy (Post 2795192)
There isn't any on the new forum except for fuck right ?

Let's test it out :hugesmile: :

**** **** bastard **** wank wanker wankery masturbation bollocks prick spastic bitch

Right. That makes the filter even more pointless. Fuck is the one everybody uses and that's not safe for the kiddies, but all the rest are allowed by the filter?

Captain.Remy 24-12-2009 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 2795219)
Let's test it out :hugesmile: :

**** **** bastard **** wank wanker wankery masturbation bollocks prick spastic bitch

Right. That makes the filter even more pointless. Fuck is the one everybody uses and that's not safe for the kiddies, but all the rest are allowed by the filter?

You shut you mother****ing big fat ass you **** who likes to sucks cock on a ****ing horse you asshole. :D

Verdict: Definitely useless.

Stu 24-12-2009 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain.Remy (Post 2795223)
You shut you mother****ing big fat ass you **** who likes to sucks cock on a ****ing horse you asshole. :D

Verdict: Definitely useless.

Sorry, but thanks to those stars I now suddenly believe you are wishing me a merry christmas and a happy new year :joker:.

Captain.Remy 24-12-2009 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 2795227)
Sorry, but thanks to those stars I now suddenly believe you are wishing me a merry christmas and a happy new year :joker:.

It's better than nothing right? Enjoy lol

Marc 24-12-2009 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enid (Post 2793596)
Well no, it doesn't NEED to be removed but most people on here find it is unnecessary. I hate seeing posts full of asterisks. What are they trying to protect me from?!?

If you hate asterisks, stop swearing? LOL

People don't need to swear all the time

Stu 24-12-2009 11:18 AM

Some people do though, without even thinking of it. It's the principal really, and it's a principal most are in favour of.

I know the admins will say why don't you just stop swearing, giving there usual deadpan response, but to that I say well why don't you just remove the filter?

Your people have spoken.

WOMBAI 24-12-2009 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 2795175)
Your just clutching at straws now. The more arguments I give in my posts, the less you seem to respond to.

You have nothing to go on but assumptions now. You are assuming people are not posting on this forum because of the language, which personally I think is bollocks. The language does not stand out or dominate that much, it's merely a feature of some peoples posts, and crops up in others a few times too. I also think it's bollocks that this forum is dominated by people who simply curse all the time. But hey, a lie is the perfect way to follow up an unfounded assumption in order to prove your point, right?

Twenty eight people is not a huge number, but it's still quiet clear that's the way the poll is going. Right now it's something like thirty versus two. How long do you need this to go on for exactly? Sixty versus four? One hundred and twenty versus eight?

You are entitled to your own opinion but the majority quiet clearly see no need for a filter. Argue with assumptions all you want but I have that poll on my side. Invite the rest of the forum to vote. I still doubt it's going to swing your way anytime soon.

You really are a patronising sod aren't you. If anyone is clutching at straws - it is you - putting so much weight onto the small number of people that have voted! If enough people vote - then maybe that figure you give of 120 v 8 will be in favour of the filter. Who knows - you are doing a lot of assuming yourself!

And who the hell are you to call me a liar! How does believing that a lot of people on the site swear, most of which I personally don't have a problem with, make me a liar. Unfounded accusations like that are the lie - made with the intentions of undermining my opinions. Cheap shot!

If the filter is removed - then undoubtedly - some, at least, will take advantage and the site could become a no-go area for those that don't like it!

Beastie 24-12-2009 11:20 AM

No.

WOMBAI 24-12-2009 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain.Remy (Post 2795223)
You shut you mother****ing big fat ass you **** who likes to sucks cock on a ****ing horse you asshole. :D

Verdict: Definitely useless.

You missed some words! :joker:

Stu 24-12-2009 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 2795239)
You really are a patronising sod aren't you. If anyone is clutching at straws - it is you - putting so much weight onto the small number of people that have voted! If enough people vote - then maybe that figure you give of 120 v 8 will be in favour of the filter. Who knows - you are doing a lot of assuming yourself!

And who the hell are you to call me a liar! How does believing that a lot of people on the site swear, most of which I personally don't have a problem with, make me a liar. Unfounded accusations like that are the lie - made with the intentions of undermining my opinions. Cheap shot!

If the filter is removed - then undoubtedly - some, at least, will take advantage and the site could become a no-go area for those that don't like it!

LOOK AT THE POLL RATIO, NOT THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO VOTED.

Get it, yet? It's not assumption to say that if the poll went on, it still would not be in your favour. Not at all. Look at the gap size for christ sake.

Captain.Remy 24-12-2009 11:28 AM

91.89% against. That's not even close lol

WOMBAI 24-12-2009 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 2795219)
Let's test it out :hugesmile: :

**** **** bastard **** wank wanker wankery masturbation bollocks prick spastic bitch

Right. That makes the filter even more pointless. Fuck is the one everybody uses and that's not safe for the kiddies, but all the rest are allowed by the filter?

That just proves what a 'rebellious' little t**t you are - trying to 'take on' the system - outgrew that myself years ago! Oh how it makes me cringe! :joker:

Captain.Remy 24-12-2009 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 2795239)
You really are a patronising sod aren't you. If anyone is clutching at straws - it is you - putting so much weight onto the small number of people that have voted! If enough people vote - then maybe that figure you give of 120 v 8 will be in favour of the filter. Who knows - you are doing a lot of assuming yourself!

Funny thing is, you seemed to be fine with not many people voting against the BH 2 days ago and you were doing a lot of assuming yourself. Now, as you don't agree with the topic, you criticize it. Hypocrisy...

WOMBAI 24-12-2009 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain.Remy (Post 2795256)
Funny thing is, you seemed to be fine with not many people voting against the BH 2 days ago and you were doing a lot of assuming yourself. Now, as you don't agree with the topic, you criticize it. Hypocrisy...

If I recall - many thought you were doing a lot of assuming! :joker:

Stu 24-12-2009 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 2795255)
That just proves what a 'rebellious' little t**t you are - trying to 'take on' the system - outgrew that myself years ago! Oh how it makes me cringe! :joker:

Actually me and Remy were having a little joke but if you want to view it as 'taking on the system' go ahead.

If you want to properly argue out then be my guest, I would be happy to continue this discussion, but if you are going to ignore most of my points and simply respond by slagging me off and the way I post - before then reversing it to make me look like the bad one, then hit the fucking road and stop wasting my time will you?

Seroiously, I find you utterly beyond astonishment. You lambast me for being patronising, something you would never stoop to, and then follow it up with a patronising comment!

Why don't you check out some of the other threads. We have a few teenagers around here who, believe it or not, are acting like teenagers. Oh how dare they! Maybe you could pick another scrap with them like you usually do.

Captain.Remy 24-12-2009 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 2795261)
If I recall - many thought you were doing a lot of assuming! :joker:

But I'm not a hypocrite agreeing with a poll where about 20 people voted and 2 days later doubting it where about 40 people voted in.

And it was basically a joke between Stu and I so no need to get on your high horses.

WOMBAI 24-12-2009 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 2795262)
Actually me and Remy were having a little joke but if you want to view it as 'taking on the system' go ahead.

If you want to properly argue out then be my guest, I would be happy to continue this discussion, but if you are going to ignore most of my points and simply respond by slagging me off and the way I post - before then reversing it to make me look like the bad one, then hit the fucking road and stop wasting my time will you?

Seroiously, I find you utterly beyond astonishment. You lambast me for being patronising, something you would never stoop to, and then follow it up with a patronising comment!

Why don't you check out some of the other threads. We have a few teenagers around here who, believe it or not, act like teenagers.. maybe you could pick another scrap with them like you usually do.

Oh you always try this 'put down' crap Stu - that is your style. I have become immune to it - so don't waste your time! I have responded to whatever I considered worth responding to - same as you! Yes - I give as good as I get - what is the issue there! As for the scrapping with teenagers comment - something I never see you doing ha, ha!

Beastie 24-12-2009 11:41 AM

:cat: meowwwwwwww

Stu 24-12-2009 11:41 AM

No, no, Remy, it was not a joke. Apparently we were twats who are trying to take on the system. Don't insult her though. That's just wrong, apparently. She can do it all she likes and loose her rag with people half her age, later defending herself by flipping the tabels to make them look patronising, but we can't.

Captain.Remy 24-12-2009 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu (Post 2795269)
No, no, Remy, it was not a joke. Apparently we were twats who are trying to take on the system. Don't insult her though. That's just wrong, apparently. She can do it all she likes and loose her rag with people half her age, later defending herself by flipping the tabels to make them look patronising, but we can't.

She apparently thinks TIBB is a dictatorship where the mods are bias are are trying to shut down the opposition. I'm beyond taking her seriously.

WOMBAI 24-12-2009 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain.Remy (Post 2795271)
She apparently thinks TIBB is a dictatorship where the mods are bias are are trying to shut down the opposition. I'm beyond taking her seriously.

Now you have Stu to back you up Remy - go on go for it!

Captain.Remy 24-12-2009 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WOMBAI (Post 2795272)
Now you have Stu to back you up Remy - go on go for it!

Yeah let's all try to shut the opposition down, us macho males against the lesbian feminists ! Wooo !!!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.