lol Someone is getting in Stick's goodbooks.:laugh:

That still doesn't alter the fact that there are some posts here that members have put a lot of time and effort into. It's fine to be pedantic and point out the obvious, but it's still no reason to justify the mass deletion of every post. Anyway, it's never going to happen. The fact that the threads are still here for all the previous BB's is obviously something the admin and founder-members are extemely proud of. It serves as a good reference point, and the times that I've dipped into the old content here have brought a smile to my face. I'm sure the more senior members hold those threads in very high regard.

lol! whatever sticks says is his opinion, i have the right to agree or disagree. i disagreed with him on some points.. but on saving threads like boris bar i agreed on. lmao

yes but its seriously annoying when pointless ones are brought back... whats the point... theyre over and done with.... nobody has anything else to add to them. and i still dont see what time and effort people put into 2 or 3 liner threads, its always nice to look back at them of course.. but if the dead thread has had its time, it shud at LEAST be locked. so the people who do like to go back and smile at it CAN at thier own will. but the ones that dont, arent forced too when people like Orlaith Rules brings them back with a word like 'Lolz'.

do you get what im saying?

Yeah agreed.There are posts out there that are actually worth the read an well deleting all those wouldn't be justified and well deleting post by post ain't gonna hapen either.:bored:

Well yes, of course I do. I wouldn't have started the thread on the 'Suggestions' board if I didn't. I didn't single any one member out though, as there's more than one culprit, after all. And a private message to admin would've been pointless, as it was necessary to see if the other members thought along similar lines. But there's no time to decide which threads should or shouldn't be locked. It would take admin all day to decide what threads would or would not be likely to get new and valid content in the future. The threads on the BB6 board at the moment are a bad example, but there are bound to be times when old threads could be revived and the debate continued.

simple answer to it all:

anybody caught posting pointless stuff while bringing back an old thread shud get a warning.

3 warnings resulting in ban.

Well yeah, but we don't make the rules.

glad you agree

That's a little pointless, when the original post is just above.

i emphasized the part where you agreed with me. lol

I see it more like the part when the contestants used to reveal a section of the screen on Catchphrase and then make their guess, and Roy Walker would say; "It's good, but it's not right." :thumbs:

It wouldn't be bad if O_R had brought back one or two, and contributed to them, but he/she/it brought back loads of them, mostly just to say 'lolz'. That's annoying, and makes people new to the forum think we're stuck in a rut.

orlaith_rules aint replyin hehe

it is the right answer. ban them, and those 'old thread reviver spammers' will be gone for good.

have they been banned then?

No, I think he/she/it just left the forum after three threads about the spamming popped up. Wouldn't you?

It is getting a bit to much, Someone could have just u2ued this guy and asked him not to. But i do agree, It shouldnt be happening.

I U2Ued 'em, fairly politely, and I just got ignored.

if he/she/it does it again, they shud be banned. IMO

I agree.... but will the mods?

Hmmm...what about admin?

Lets just see if she/he posts again!?!?!

i dont think we should be getting personal.