Have you always been a Conservative voter, arista?

Electoral reform + new election, but I'll definitely settle for a Lib/Con coalition, provided, at the very least, a referendum on electoral reform is granted.

I'd like to know in what kind of world gaining 97 seats is deemed a failure?

The part where they failed to get a majority, therefore not becoming the new leaders of the United Kingdom

"Conservatives technically lost too, since they didnt manage to get a majority"

But they Got the Most Seats.


New Labour Lost as they lost so many seats.

By 20 seats...mmkay then.

Sure but only 20 seats more needed
And Nick is Helping there.


So they Will be Bigger than any other Party after this Deal.

Lib/Lab.

Yeah, but they didnt get the majority of seats, they fell short of getting the amount of seats needed, hence them not leading the country

Oh well dammit, I must be wrong, the Tories must have won and Mr. Cameron is in Downing Street right now serving the country as Prime Minister, sorry for that mistake there!

Yes but that is to be Changed under a Nick and David Deal.


New Labour Fell Well Short.

He will be soon


Due to Talks with Nick.

Yes, it will be decided in a back room, so much for democracy

yes but better than
New Labour.

Remind me to quote that in a week.

I will, but what does that prove? Nothing really, since they technically lost, note the word technically, and not the world literally

Lib/Lab = 315 seats (still not enough for an overall majority so what assortment of "other" parties would want to get in bed with Brown & Co?)
Lib/Con = 363 seats - overall majority

Vicky not enough seats,
so No such Pact.

Bang On Right Angus

Since my conclusions are axiomatic "end of" is appropriate, whereas your attempting to end an argument when you were unable to provide any evidence for your views was inappropriate.

As for filling the extra seats with another minority party, you need to be talking in plural here, since it would take at least two other parties to get up to an overall majority. How would that work in practice, four (maybe more) different parties trying to get through legislation and govern the country? Dream on.

The other minor little problem is that sort of coalition only needs one defeat in the House of Commons, or a vote of no confidence going against the government and they are out, Cameron then gets the keys to 10 Downing Street, Gordon gets evicted.

Imagine trying to make sure the policies you want to pass are so watered down and filled with amendments to suit all the parties in your coalition. Upset one side and its bye bye.

easy...a world where you need 326 seats to claim victory.

well labour have done crap with england and the rest of britain except scotland no offence.

and lib dems on what ive heard only care about the students so i think liberal torries work better because that can be lib dems policies with other stuff and concervatives have law,imagration and nhs.

and then this country will be fine.

so did brown only cameron should choose who he reforms with anyway his party got the majority vote.

still got more than brown comfortably.

Like I said, he TECHNICALLY lost, that's different from the literally saying "Cameron lost"