ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB11 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=551)
-   -   94 days (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=137809)

DigitalSid 28-05-2010 10:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveTRW (Post 3264768)
so there have been two contracts since bb7, so my orginal statement is still correct minus the one contract part
Forgot to say, don't you mean BB6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveTRW (Post 3264816)
no the main part of my ordinal statement was that the contact states that all the series are 13 weeks long.
which you disagreed with, and which you are still yet to prove.

http://i277.photobucket.com/albums/k...adFacepalm.png
There is nothing in the contract tieing them to a set series length, hence why BB5 and BB6 were different lengths, and BB7 was extended to 13 weeks just before launch (which narked Endemol who hadn't planned for it, hence the almost weekly twist and late series lull that year).

ILoveTRW 28-05-2010 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalSid (Post 3264914)
Forgot to say, don't you mean BB6.



There is nothing in the contract tieing them to a set series length, hence why BB5 and BB6 were different lengths, and BB7 was extended to 13 weeks just before launch (which reliable insiders on DS said narked Endemol who hadn't planned for it).
no proof then?

DigitalSid 28-05-2010 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveTRW (Post 3264926)
no proof then?
BB6 is proof. There may be a lower limit but there isn't an upper one.

ILoveTRW 28-05-2010 10:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalSid (Post 3264938)
BB6 is proof.
not really
contracts change

DigitalSid 28-05-2010 10:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveTRW (Post 3264940)
not really
contracts change
Not without good reason and agreement from both sides, even if that was the case, how does it rule out the 14 week rumour?

ILoveTRW 28-05-2010 10:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalSid (Post 3264954)
Not without good reason and agreement from both sides, even if that was the case, how does it rule out the 14 week rumour?
daily star

DigitalSid 28-05-2010 10:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveTRW (Post 3264962)
daily star
But that wasn't your reasoning, your reasoning was it being in the contract for it to be 13 weeks.

ILoveTRW 28-05-2010 10:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DigitalSid (Post 3264999)
But that wasn't your reasoning, your reasoning was it being in the contract for it to be 13 weeks.
what?

DigitalSid 28-05-2010 10:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveTRW (Post 3265008)
what?
Your reasoning that this post was un-necessary and that the 14 week rumour was never credible.

Plus as much as they B.S., the Daily Star were right about BB's last relength.

(And this year's stupid launch night twist)


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28 AM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.