Correct.

Homosexuality chooses them.

:xyxwave:

[QUOTE=ElProximo;3792507]i didnt say they had to be in love with a human,i was saying a living thing otherwise i think they are insane.

'waving cutesy' aside - what are you saying then? That it is a disease in the womb?
Is it some chemicals that find the developing fetus and 'infect' it?
You are closer to the idea there are people who would otherwise be hetero or 'normal' and would be originally intended to be 'straight',
but,
then something affects them and changes it?

The best studies we have show something like 1 to 3% have, at some time, had some 'homosexual experience',
but,
even that needs to be looked at when this can include people who (for example) had a single experience in university they describe as 'homosexual'.

As for those 'exclusively homosexual' and 'ongoing' this isn't easy to narrow down but it may be less than 1%
A lot of companies want to find out more and more about this demographic and sell them things,
but,
they can't find much more than about 1 or 2%.

You could find more depending on what region, city, area and less in another region city or area.
One city I lived in and I could safely and easily say about 1 in every 25 people were 'actively exclusively homosexual'.
In my hometown I would be shocked if you could find 1 in every 300.

Again, don't assume I am 'opposed to gays'. I notice a few people are doing that. Don't.
Nothing I'm telling you actually tells you that so don't assume.

Except when you called gay people ******* like six times?

i normally like them,but they stick up for shoe lovers so what can i say.

The way i think he meant it was that the anus is meant to be an exit hole, naturally.

he did call them *******, and he then goes to stick up for shoe lovers.:conf:

i think el proximo is keeping something secret about shoe obcessions.:hugesmile:

Actually male's g spot is in the arse :)

Ahhh Thanks poppet, but I have read it.

Perhaps that comment was too deep for you. Maybe i should have said "God exists ONLY in the hearts and minds of Man"

Interesting to note the female anus contains more sensory pleasure nerves than the vagina.

Do you mean the prostate? If you do then you should know its not in the butt but can be accessed that way, it can also be stimulated through the perineum

No.
*Insult Removed*
What I did was ask you if YOU were (by implication) arguing that gays have either a physical deformity or mental retardation of some kind.
You.
Not me.

The male 'g-spot' is called 'the penis'. There is no 'g-spot' in the rectum although if you want to go inside the body then push through the rectum wall into the prostate you can force seminal fluid out of the penis.

Er, I dont think the gays have a monopoly on anal sex.

I'd post links but....

some of your post got removed?:conf:

Someone has an 'agenda' and feels they can make it happen by censoring speech.

*claps for you*

ElProximo is quite possibly the most ignorant person i've seen on this forum with his pathetic 'arguement'.

I can't take ElProximo's posts seriously without wiggling my fingers in the air, there are too many 'apostrophes' and "speech marks."

Actually, I lied, I just can't take them seriously at all.

The anus still has pleasure sensors in it though. It's not just "meant" for ****ting.

Straight people have anal sex as well. It doesn't make it unnatural.

Wrong.
The best studies (and these are the best scientific studies by PHDs) find somewhere between 1 to 3% 'identifying'.
As I explained already - this can even include people who 'felt some homosexual feelings' 20 years ago and chose to report having had some 'homosexual experience'.

The other thing you can do is just open your eyes and realize that 10% of the people are not homosexuals.


No, you didn't but I asked if that was the idea when someone believes (based on nothing) that babies are born homosexual.
I explain it further:
Is the penis a mistake or is the brain having a problem?
That is where YOU GO when you decide to argue for this 'born gay' angle.

I strongly agree.
The Appendix has a purpose.

Here it won't matter if you believe in some unguided evolution or a creator but you have a problem:
Why would the physiology (which we never find) but suppose the brain of the gay baby does has altered.
So the sperm production is like some kind of bad joke?
nature's cruel joke?
Why don't they produce disinfectants in the rectum?
I'm asking YOU if YOU think nature made a mistake.
I don't.
That is why I put the bunny ears around 'gender', Spock. Nobody was confused.
You didn't need to clear up this was 'illogical' ffs lol

But that is the idea with the 'born gay' people. That there is something like a different 'gender'.
There is male, female and another kind of sex born called a 'gay' and another 'lesbian'.
This is what the 'born gay' people are doing. Not me.
Why wikipedia that WHEN I TAUGHT YOU THAT IN THE EARLIER POST.
I TOLD YOU.
You got that information from me first.
So why did you 'inform' me of what I just previously taught you?
That was illogical lol

Is it true that most people that were molested at a young age by a person of the same sex, that they end up being gay when they get older?

If thats the case, then its mental, no?

Lesbians.

here is a question for everyone who is straight and follows no religion

if you had to choose to spend a whole day trapped in a room with either a bible basher or a very camp gay

who would you choose? :joker:

Bible Basher. She could be fit :love:

No, that's not true.

Whoever's got the fattest head - I'd use them as a battering ram.

Yes you are right. There has been studies showing a disproportionately high number of gay men were sexually molested by an older gay man when they were themselves children/teens.
There is some interest along the same lines with lesbian women too.
This suggests it can be a psychological issue brought on by events/upbringing trauma etc.

Here is what is even more remarkable and something fairly well known among researchers:
A highly disproportionate number of gay men reported a dysfunctional family upbringing that had a combination of two factors to some extreme:
- An absent father
- a domineering mother.
Researchers point out that 'absent' does not necessarily mean 'missing' or even gone all the time but more importantly 'unloving' cold, emotionally distant.
Researchers point out that by 'dominant mother' they don't mean in a cruel or even 'negative' way but in the sense of being the central figure who is 'dominant', controlling, the initiator and the dominating social figure.
One study had a whopping 60% of gay men reporting this as a significant dysfunctional problem.
This suggests the interest or appeal in being gay can come about from psycho-sociological issues.

But if there was a 'gay gene' that definitely brings up the inevitable question (especially with great advances in mapping genomes, genetic therapy etc) and here it is:
Should we find and isolate the gene even when it is still a fetus and then what?
How many would simply choose to abort the gay baby,
or,
Maybe more the question is the potential option of gene therapy to replace the 'gay gene' while keeping the baby?
How many would do that?
Would you?
Another question might be giving a baby a 'gay gene' as parent may want the freedom to choose.
Maybe the Mum always dreamed to have her own gay boy?
Shouldn't she have the right to choose what she wants for her own body and put the gay gene in the soon-to-be baby boy or girl?

:joker:, this is utter bollocks, did you make this up last night, people don't make a conscious decision to be gay, you decide to be gay and let's see if it works for you and if your theory is so full proof like you seem to think where does bisexuality fit in to your bigoted spectrum? Who told you you were Sigmund Freud?