Correct me if im wrong but you were first to 'trip up' in your comment trying to outsmart Patrick, no?

Now back on topic... to something unrelated. Okay :laugh:

omg 08marsh u are such a bad BB fan xxxx u should be blindly looking forward to a channel 5 show on the basis of JohnnyBB's wild guesses!!!!

You dreamer


How can she
she has 2 contracts a big one with Ch4
and another with ITV1.


May Have Implied?


No she said
with Dermot Ch5 will be great for Big Brother
how do you get so confused.

Oh dear, there's you tripping yourself up again! I don't believe I made the bold statment about, [sic] "Always being right first time".

*checks back posts*

Nope, not me. I just happened to give my opinon on some of the posts on the thread. (Which, bizarrely, this being a forum, I am permitted to do so). I also added in my own view.

Unlike your good self who seems hell bent on being troublesome for the sake of it. ;)

This thread. <3

You gave your opinion on Patricks post THEN added you own view claiming you was 'on topic'

Sorry for thinking the topic is what is in the OP and title. :joker:

And im not being troublesome just pointing out a mistake you made whilst been catty to a member who cannot reply atm. My following posts to that are irrelevant. I should have known you cannot tell the difference between a serious post and ones that are in jest. ;)

Simple answer then Jordan. Do not grace yourself with assumptions on other members. Since I posted on this thread, you have done nothing but try to be argumentative and bothersome. Right from your very first reply to my comment. Which, by the way, remains. Patrick cannot reply through no fault other than his own. Perhaps you might want to raise that matter with the mods, rather than me. His posts remain on the thread and therefore, are still able to be commented on and referred to.

As long as they remain on the thread, I and anyone else, can refer to them (or indeed, any other post that has been made and is able to be read).Re BIB. Your use of the winky smiley shows clearly what your intention has been..... less than jovial, and more with jags.

Now, perhaps you'd like to allow the thread to continue in the manner that it was raised for - rather than trying to perhaps be seen to be trying to 'bait' and antagonise another member? Thank you.

Jesus. You do know how to esculate a small matter into something totally OTT and irrelevant to what it started off as.

If I am infact only trying to bait then you took to it very well didn't you. :shrug:

Totally agree with all of this.

Couldn't help but notice you swear Patrick so I'm just going to point it out to you again!!! :blush: :hugesmile: :shocked: :wavey: :nono:

The show is a shadow of its former self. So I couldn't care and have no intentions of praising it or channel 5.

[2]

_