I see this thread being closed soon :joker:

lmao sh.

Fight fight fight!!!!

I like that you have raised this Charlie, for 2 reasons.

1 It's definitely an interesting suggestion, and worth a debate.

2 I know now who slagged me off with a vicious comment in a recent awards thread, by something said in here, choice of words is very revealing. Tsk, am surprised at you. Dont bother with a comeback, cos I dont care anymore. (I dont mean Charlie btw, its not him)

Who is it then? Because I don't see the merit in stirring the pot unless you're willing to list the ingredients. Sorry but it smacks of attention seeking.

I think an argument sub forum would do more harm than anything else. As someone else has pointed out, things would spill out into the forum.

I don't think it would work.

Stu/Kate if this is going to become something, take it to PM please

Nah it's not me. At least I don't think so. Her message is a bit cryptic. I read the thread again and I can't see anything to do with her.

Round 1 ding ding ding

I'm looking forward to Round 2.:joker:

Seems completely pointless and more trouble then it'd be worth.

See this thread itself is turning into what I think would happen.

Snarky little comments and leading to tensions being built. The proper way to ease it all is by PMing each other, away from the eyes of everybody else.

Nope, no fight etc, as Stu says this isnt going to become anything.

I just spotted something that was a dead giveaway, there will be no arguing with anyone in here, via pm or anywhere at all. As I said, I dont care. I got tons of support and have plenty of friends on here, not interested in anyone who has to knock me to feel good.
End of.

woooo Kate calm it down calm it down.

Sorry to disappoint you Tom, I am calm, its you who seems to want to promote trouble, I suggest you stop and calm down yourself. :hug:

hahaha

I'll do an Orwell on it myself. Gentlemanly bastard that I am.

If you actually read my posts you would understand that what you said in this post is not the case.

I have no problem with a person not replying in a PM, that is perfectly fine if they want to no longer continue on with a debate. It is when you get accused of spamming an inbox that I have a problem with.

That last sentence is so ****ing degrading it makes me actually angry that you have chosen to accuse me of it. I do not desire an audience to belittle people in front of. I just do not like my posts being deleted when I have broken no rules and I thought we could possibly compromise.
You mod team are such a bunch of controlling robots who will just accuse someone of the most disgusting things because they choose to disagree with a couple of things you feel are right.

I have not once belittled someone today but my posts were deleted. So you can get of your high horse and actually listen to the little people who you think you are better than.

Half of which are coming from mods themselves. I feel the conclusion must just be that the moderators are so afraid of losing even the slightest bit of power that they couldn't handle a thread where their control was the tinniest bit relaxed.

I have read your posts Charlie and I still feel exactly the same. I don't think I'm better than anyone else on here and I don't think I come across that way at all. I just can't see the logic in wanting to continue arguments but only in public, unless you want an audience to be watching. No one can accuse you of spamming their in box for sending one PM, if they don't reply to that one PM then they obviously aren't interested in continuing the argument. Simple.

Hang on Stu, why exactly are you having a go at me?

I am not airing dirty laundry as you put it. I simply realised from this thread who had slagged me off, and thought I would let them know I knew, discreetly, and without a kickoff. That's an end to it as far as I am concerned. But yes, you are right, of course I do care really, its my nature, I care to much what people think of me, but seeing as most people on here do like me, then I will just try to not let those who dont get me down.

Hang on Stu, why exactly are you having a go at me?

I am not airing dirty laundry as you put it. I simply realised from this thread who had slagged me off, and thought I would let them know I knew, discreetly, and without a kickoff. That's an end to it as far as I am concerned. But yes, you are right, of course I do care really, its my nature, I care to much what people think of me, but seeing as most people on here do like me, then I will just try to not let those who dont get me down.

Really? Because you seem to be the only one in here fighting for this Charlie, no one else seems that bothered :conf: