![]() |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The Point is
he could not do his Job proper. His respect was lost. |
He did David Cameron no favours by staying on so long. It still remains though that he clearly did nothing that resulted in his arrest for anything he said. So for me it is unfair someone loses their status in such a scenario.
Maybe had he said he did use the word, it might have gone away,as it is you have him in effect saying the Police are lying as to the words used and they in effect saying he is too. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Should he have done what he did? No. Did he apologize? Yes, did he admit responsibility for the things he said? No. Is this issue important? Yes, it damaged the image of the conservative party further and soured relations between the government and the police federation. How the public view those in positions of power, responsibility and trust is important. |
what a disgusting nation we've become, when a man has to resign from his job just for having an opinion.
|
Some of the police ARE plebs,and from what I have read ,he said he didn't call them that,so do we believe the police or him,obviously if you dont like the Tories you will believe the police,but some of them are as corrupt as some of the ministers,you'de think they would have something better to do than pursue him for that,lol,what a silly thing to lose your job over.
|
Quote:
And how can the nation be blamed for his resignation? haha! |
Quote:
If it's derogatory, tell him/her and see how long you keep your job "for having an opinion" :joker: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's incredibly disturbing that we live in a society whereby a policeman initially kicking up a fuss over a heated exchange of words, can result in someone losing their job through an alleged insult and the frenzy caused by this resignation means people are out celebrating & rejoicing- yet a policeman who tasers a blind man is not subject to the same amount of witch hunt and treatment. What a bizarre place the UK is. |
Quote:
Why is this then, I would like to believe whoever is telling the truth but we only have one account to put up for examination as Mr Mitchell is unwilling to admit what he said. Should that make him guilty by default, what other option do we have...sweep it under the carpet? No, it is important that as a representative of the UK government he is held accountable. I would love everyone who suggests the police are plebs to do their job for a week.. This type pf comment proves the danger behind this attitude, the public viewing the police as incompetent jobsworths, undermining the progress made between communities and the police over several years. |
Quote:
You walk up to a police officer and call him a pleb, see what happens. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Blind man tasered. 2 very recent examples in the press showing just how incompetent the police are (and if you take the JSaville situ into it, you can add all of those police who were involved into that mix). The very same can be said of many: including Mr Mitchell but I've yet to have it confirmed where his incompetency lies? As for him having to be held accountable. He was. He admitted it, he apologised, policeman accepted apology - and no doubt he also received a dressing down from the PM - that's what's called accountability. That should have been the end of it. Wanting someone to lose their job & rejoicing over it, for having a heated exchange of words, with absolutly no proof of him calling the copper a pleb - is beyond any rationale - imo of course. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That woild put an end to all the supposition, too late now though eh? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Shall I start googling tory scandals and cover-ups? The supergun affair....The sinking of the Belgrano?.... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.