It seems there was a bit more to it than what we saw..especially with them cutting away from the convo a lot on the LF whenever its mentioned.

That said, the others could just be making a mountain out of a molehill. But if tey were..why would B censor everything about it? :conf:

I dont get this tbh

Both were good (if a bit cringey) TV I thought.

And some people are way older than that and talk so immaturely,age is not a gauge of intelligence.

we need vids vids i tell ya

So now he was pissed off too? :joker:

If it was that bad shouldnt they have both been given a warning? If they had been given one, surely they would have shown it,as they usually do. Also I havent seen any thing about complaints to the tv watchdog people like there was the Daley/Hazel thing.

they cut out the hair sniffing incident shocking

Nothing bad about it, all harmless fun.
The housemates making something of nothing to start with, saying she would not talk to him,must all be deaf.
About time there was a bit of fun and banter in there.:hugesmile:

the same old people trying to sully Callums name,it's pitiful it really is,he must be doing something right it's all some of them want to talk about.

Wasn't Dexter warned by Big Brother for making comments abut rape and pinning girls down underneath covers? :nono:

Don't be hypocrites now. What Dexter does is 1000x worse than what Callum did (and I don't even like Callum, I prefer Dexter).

No proof at all of that, so I doubt it somehow. He got his warning fr the caravan comment to Sophie.

They showed it in the highlights didn't they? That's where the article surfaced from :conf:

No they didnt. They showed the warning for the sophie thing. Apparantly (according to the star :D) the rodeo comments happened the same day and the warning was for that. But the warning never mentioned that.

Honestly?This is your opinion?
Cloud coockoo land.lol