ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB12 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=624)
-   -   Vicky'I feel intimidated by Carol' video (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=237638)

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by don99 (Post 6374662)
9 out of 11 examples not being about looks is not a good start

I said looks, and other things.

anne666 11-09-2013 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374663)
Why LOOKS I listed all sorts of things, and looks was only one of those things.

Proof of her arguing technique please !!! Stick to your statement. Deviation !!

chuff me dizzy 11-09-2013 06:52 PM

Any news yet Anne666 ? or should I go back to my Lake District jigsaw ?

anne666 11-09-2013 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 6374672)
Any news yet Anne666 ? or should I go back to my Lake District jigsaw ?

NO !!! I am bored now !!!:sleep:No doubt youtube or whatever else is getting a good thrashing :joker:

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 06:56 PM

You are all waiting on your own conspiracy theory, you made up yourselves. Read what I actually said. She 'will' behave that way.

anne666 11-09-2013 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374680)
You are all waiting on your own conspiracy theory, you made up yourselves. Read what I actually said.

Deviation Mu Lord !!!

chuff me dizzy 11-09-2013 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374680)
You are all waiting on your own conspiracy theory, you made up yourselves. Read what I actually said. She 'will' behave that way.

THIS is what you said ............



Originally Posted by anne666
I have seen Carol many times over the years and NEVER heard her attack anyone in that manner. Where have you seen her do that?
...Your reply was .........At least 20 times in CBB.

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6374681)
Deviation Mu Lord !!!

Ok, whatever obviously 'will behave that way' means something else to you.

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 6374683)
THIS is what you said ............



Originally Posted by anne666
I have seen Carol many times over the years and NEVER heard her attack anyone in that manner. Where have you seen her do that?
...Your reply was .........At least 20 times in CBB.

Did I say that I could list them all?

anne666 11-09-2013 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374684)
Ok, whatever obviously 'will behave that way' means something else to you.

Total assumption without proof!!! :dance:You do understand what proof means ?

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6374688)
Total assumption without proof!!! :dance:You do understand what proof means ?

Proof of intent you mean. Character analysis, and all that.

anne666 11-09-2013 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374687)
Did I say that I could list them all?

Don't make any statement you can't prove. You constantly attack others for just that reason. You have never seen her argue.Stop this messing about please.

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 07:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6374690)
Don't make any statement you can't prove. You constantly attack others for just that reason. You have never seen her argue.Stop this messing about please.

I never said she argued. I said 'will' past tense future tense. This is about Vicky intimidated, and that means that it is something that could happen. Future tense.

anne666 11-09-2013 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374691)
I never said she argued. I said 'will' past tense future tense. This is about Vicky intimidated, and that means that it is something that could happen. Future tense.

Ever decreasing circles of deviation. OK proof of why you know how Carol will argue, without the use of speculation.

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6374701)
Ever decreasing circles of deviation. OK proof of why you know how Carol will argue, without the use of speculation.

Speculation yes. I don't mind speculation based on evidence.

don99 11-09-2013 07:12 PM

had a glance back,maybe i am looking in the wrong place but it was looks,acting skills and figure. as i see it 1 and three could be the same.

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by don99 (Post 6374705)
had a glance back,maybe i am looking in the wrong place but it was looks,acting skills and figure. as i see it 1 and three could be the same.

It was never a complete list, it was a list of examples. The list has no end to it. You can add more.

anne666 11-09-2013 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374703)
Speculation yes. I don't mind speculation based on evidence.

Well I do, sorry. Speculation is just that, nothing more.NOT proof.

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6374710)
Well I do, sorry. Speculation is just that, nothing more.NOT proof.

The proof is if they do argue, and then I am right if Carol uses attacks like the ones that I mentioned. I could still get my proof.

don99 11-09-2013 07:21 PM

now you are having a laugh, its your list which you cannot complete but say i can complete even though i cannot get past number 2 of your 11

anne666 11-09-2013 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374713)
The proof is if they do argue, and then I am right if Carol uses attacks like the ones that I mentioned. I could still get my proof.

NO that is in the future.More deviation.:joker:

Jennifereliza 11-09-2013 07:25 PM

I've seen Carol be bitchy much more than 20 times....if you haven't seen her be a bitter, nasty, bitchy old hag then you've been watching the wrong show. She's even bitchy IN HER SLEEP! Get her out.

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6374718)
NO that is in the future.More deviation.:joker:

I said 'will' that is future tense my proof is in the future. If I say that rock will fall down in a minute, my proof is in the future.

anne666 11-09-2013 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374725)
I said 'will' that is future tense my proof is in the future.

NO as I said years ago now" will argue" denotes a knowledge of how she argues. Proof and please not supposition again!:sleep:

Pincho Paxton 11-09-2013 07:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anne666 (Post 6374726)
NO as I said years ago now" will argue" denotes a knowledge of how she argues. Proof and please not supposition again!:sleep:

You can only use supposition for future tense. The proof is always in the future.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pincho Paxton (Post 6374352)
It's hard to argue with Carol who will just slate your looks, slate your acting skills, slate your figure, and say "I don't really care."



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.