![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://newspaper.jimdavidson.org.uk/ :nono: Bye. |
Quote:
100% agree. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As it is Jim talked at length to them anyway as to his arrest and the investigation,even to pointing out his own legal team did some investigating as well as the Police. Jim is not charged with a single thing,the file is closed and no action is to be taken whatsoever. It is in her favour that Linda saw no mileage there at all and was wise enough to keep her mouth shut as to it. In fact in her favour is she has never insinuated otherwise as to that investigation as to Jim despite hating him so much. However he has mentioned it and gone into great detail as to it as well. Contrast that with the legal facts and evidence and subsequent charges and fine afforded to her husband for what is a recorded criminal act of theft from Jim's friend Frank Carson. 2 very different issues one a recorded fact, the other deemed false enough to have no action taken as to any of it whatsoever. Linda could and should have been in massive bother had she been even as bad enough as that to make any suggestion he was guilty of anything there,especially on a national TV programme too. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He was totally honest and upfront as to it and it is a really nasty thing to have over a year of false allegations hanging over your head. Contast that with Linda, saying there were only allegations against her husband and that he pleaded guilty ot cler the press from their door. Total lies,he was caught on camera actually taking the money,Linda selectively missed that vital part out when telling the others of the incident. That's false and she was caught out too by the BB cameras deliberately giving a false account of the events. I'll take what Jim says over her anyday. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.