Well, who knows . It is irrelevant anyway, since it was an argument about double standards. When remonstrating with Dappy, Jasmine said that any person having that number of partners in one night was gross, and Luisa didn't disagree with her.

I think you will find that dappy was right

temper temer ill be reporting that filthy language , youre badly rattled.
you cant seem to accept jimbo is the rightful winner? i wonde why lol

I allways said Jim and Luisa should have been top 2.

They were the most deserving imo.

You cant find it in you to say jimbo deserved it and you also condoned the fact they wrongly libelled him a sexist pig in there, even though there was no evidence to support it. that means you are being 100% hypocritical with your double standards.

Erm my last post was I allways said Jim and Luisa should have been top 2

They were the most deserving imo.

LOL I said exactly that :joker:

:laugh:

No you didnt, that is a lie.

Its there in black and white lol.

Heres a screen grab :)

Attachment 2649

you wanted luisa to win and you supported her and linda discrimination against jim.

Choke on this.

what a very nasty thing to say to someone? I thought you were going to ask me out? tut tut

You play it in every thread.


:umm2: You're joking right? Men have always had rights.

Women couldn't vote till the 1920's, you had to be over 30 though. It wasn't until 1928 that all women were given the right to vote.

It took a few more years for them to be allowed jobs such as accounting and the legal profession. Women couldn't inherit property until the the mid 1920's.

It wasn't until the mid 1950's that women civil servants and teachers would receive pay equal to men and it took nearly 20 more years until the introduction of the equal pay act.

In the 1970's working women could only get a mortgage if they had the signature of a male guarantor.

The most shocking thing I came across was that it wasn't until the 1990's that rape in marriage was made a criminal offense.

working class men had no right to vote either 100 years ago? why do you ignore that?
65 million working class POOR MEN died in world war 2....fighting wars for the rich....the majority of other MEN died of TB down the mines or the slate quarries, earning a pittance of pay to feed their families....yes werent they all horrible sexist men....didnt they die for britain and down the pits because they were all so mean and selfish and women haters?
NO ...HELL NO
I supposed you and feminists think all those men who gave up their seats on the escape boats as the titanic sunk to women and children and drowned instead in freezing waters, werent chivalrpous or brave, they were patronising women , the sexist din0osaurs....so lets urinate on their memories and their legacies, lets desicrate their graves too...all bastewards the lot of them

the perverted rewriting of history by feminazis is a dangerous destructive propoganda of lies and revisionism

THE ONLY WAR IS BETWEEN THE RICH AND POOR. there is nor never has been a battle of the sexes and sexism is a complete and utter lie.

are people oppressed? in poor nations? erm yes. are the disabled, the sick, the poor , the needy, different ethicities, different religions /......yes
the over simplification of brainwashing our next generation that all men of previous generations were woman hating selfish nasty bigots is a complete and utter disgrace....it is sefl defeating drivel and it actually destroys society for everyone
ps a man fought for women to get the vote.,the suffragettes used terrorism, lloyd george used his genius....he also was the first politician in the world to tax kings and landowners who owned the UK and by defaults owned the voters.
he also set in place the welfare state, national insurance and laid foundations for the NHS

back in those days we had no health service for men or women

society has evolved we life longer, we understand more, now we have more choice more ability to travel and experience loads of dffferent things. its simply evolution and advancement. its nothing to do with men V women. that is a false war created and stoked up by rich people selling their media outlets

colaboration is the key to our future

Finally someone who posts sense.

Everyone? I thought 'everyone' was over the moon Jim won.

Your ignorance in this matter is showing. Read up a bit on internalized misogyny which much like internalized racism is actually a real issue.

Sorry no but YOU are the ignorant one :xyxwave:

You seem to have a huge chip on your shoulder regarding these matters, try to look at things in a less blinkered way...

what spectacular ignorance. you need to read up on internalized misandry , male hate is internalized racism against men and a very real issue that needs to be addressed

Just a suggestion but maybe you should read up on Internalized sexism as it sums up your views to a T. This is exactly how your posts come across.

"Internalized sexism may be conscious, in which men or women actively resent other men or women, or unconscious, in which men or women who consciously hold egalitarian views may still unconsciously regard themselves as weak or unworthy compared to men or women.

Internalized sexism is common in many traditional cultures, in which men and women who are deeply invested in that culture seek actively to prevent other men and women from stepping out of the roles assigned by them in that culture, yet see their own behaviour in doing so as virtuous, as opposed to oppressive".

wrong again it sums up your views on hetro men to a tee. sad.

How is it wrong?

That statement is 100% the meaning of Internalized sexism. FACT.

I made no suggestion of heterosexual men in that post, I simply say men and women.

your internalized sexism is pouring out with each of your bitter words. its sad to be honest.

I post facts, you post bigoted false accusations.

I post in detail responses, you post little digs.

Now that's sad.