ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   'Date rape is bad, stranger rape is worse' (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=259592)

lostalex 02-08-2014 07:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the truth (Post 7119637)
so have anal sex consensually if your partmer says stop and you dont instantly stop and take 3 seconds to stop, that rape is just as bad as mugging someone on the street, hitting them over the head and dragging them into the woods to be gand raped and left for dead? according to your logic these 2 incidents are just as bad as each other and exactly the same? ???????????? really???
maybe you should ask the victims of date rape and not me. ask them dude. maybe you should spend less time defending rape as if it's just some kind of ACCIDENT that happens, and talk to actual victims. The way you are responding in this thread makes it sound like rape is sometimes just an ACCIDENT.

Kizzy 02-08-2014 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 7119647)
maybe you should ask the victims of date rape and not me. ask them dude. maybe you should spend less time defending rape as if it's just some kind of ACCIDENT that happens, and talk to actual victims. The way you are responding in this thread makes it sound like rape is sometimes just an ACCIDENT.
No, this is exactly what the professor means. by stating that there is varying degrees of violence attached to rape that is not an endorsement of rape in any degree.

lostalex 02-08-2014 09:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 7119695)
No, this is exactly what the professor means. by stating that there is varying degrees of violence attached to rape that is not an endorsement of rape in any degree.
except that it is, because it's basically excusing some types of rape as "not that bad" Think of how much worse it would be! Some rape victims weren't raped THAT BADLY!

he doesn't get that his words are basically saying, sometimes rape "isn't THAT bad". maybe we shouldn't use the word rape, cause sometimes guys just ****ed a girl against her will, but he didn't beat the hell out of her, or stab her, so its not THAT bad.

Kizzy 02-08-2014 09:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 7119809)
except that it is, because it's basically excusing some types of rape as "not that bad" Think of how much worse it would be! Some rape victims weren't raped THAT BADLY!

he doesn't get that his words are basically saying, sometimes rape "isn't THAT bad".
It's still bad... that's never been in dispute.
Dr micheal Stone devised a scale of evil for psychopaths from 1-22, if it is possible to 'rank' them why not rapists and peadophiles?

lostalex 02-08-2014 10:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 7119818)
It's still bad... that's never been in dispute.
Dr micheal Stone devised a scale of evil for psychopaths from 1-22, if it is possible to 'rank' them why not rapists and peadophiles?
the point is everyone is an individual, and were victimized as individuals. who the **** is richard dawkins to judge how bad a rape is? or tell anyone how much of a victim they are?

I'm an athiest, but Richard Dawkins doesn't speak for me.

Kizzy 02-08-2014 10:14 AM
Logically I think his theory only makes sense if you take the victim out of the equation and are left with the rapist and the question of intent.

lostalex 02-08-2014 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 7119841)
Logically I think his theory only makes sense if you take the victim out of the equation and are left with the rapist and the question of intent.
well said Kizzy. What does it say about him that he only sees the crime and not the victim? That he can see the impact of a crime only as the act itself, and not the impact on the victim. He doesn't seem to have any concept of people as individuals, or that you can commit the same exact crime on 50 different people and it will have 50 different impacts, because only Richard Dawkins exists in Richard Dawkins head. He's a prick.

Kizzy 02-08-2014 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 7119845)
well said Kizzy. What does it say about him that he only sees the crime and not the victim? That he can see the impact of a crime only as the act itself, and not the impact on the victim. He doesn't seem to have any concept of people as individuals, or that you can commit the same exact crime on 50 different people and it will have 50 different impacts, because only Richard Dawkins exists in Richard Dawkins head. He's a prick.
To be fair to him lots of people do that, criminologists do this as do those who work in law I suppose.

the truth 02-08-2014 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 7119830)
the point is everyone is an individual, and were victimized as individuals. who the **** is richard dawkins to judge how bad a rape is? or tell anyone how much of a victim they are?

I'm an athiest, but Richard Dawkins doesn't speak for me.
who are you to judge? who is anyone?

the truth 02-08-2014 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex (Post 7119647)
maybe you should ask the victims of date rape and not me. ask them dude. maybe you should spend less time defending rape as if it's just some kind of ACCIDENT that happens, and talk to actual victims. The way you are responding in this thread makes it sound like rape is sometimes just an ACCIDENT.
no im asking you dude :nono:


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:52 PM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.