Originally Posted by Lwize (Post 7140622)

Chris was clearly in the right over this greedy nonsense.
The pact was a joke, and now irrelevant.
Hopefully, justice will be served tomorrow with Mark's eviction.

Originally Posted by mrflibble (Post 7140807)

Yeah, I'm not really sure why everyone's treating the pact as a sacred vow. Most of them knew that it would likely to never happen and most of them would've assumed that if the winner did split it, it would be with their friends. Every single person in that house had the right to say they would take it and regardless of what they said in the DR or what they said to everyone else, only ONE person got flak for their decision. Ash, Mark and Chris were in the right to take the money for whatever reason, but no housemate knows what any of them were planning to do with it. I don't believe any housemate would've split it with everyone, but they might've given some to their friends and that's it.

Originally Posted by Lex (Post 7140735)

Never mind "Groundless my arse" :joker: ....stop squirming and show us the proof that Ash was lying about sharing the money....or admit that you are just talking bollocks! :spin:

Originally Posted by Jords (Post 7140175)

A good judge of character doesnt just go on the exact words that come out of peoples' mouths. Me and my dad were actually in agreement that we'd take the money and split it only with the HMs we had befriended or were 'nice enough'. And if we won wed do the same with that money set aside. So actually I fully agree with Chris and he has a right to make that decision.

Do I think all the other HMs would share equally that money? No. And Im not gonna have an opinion based just on the words that directly leave their mouth over it. Do I understand why they got mad? Of course. But how they presented themselves once again was as nasty individuals whom pick and choose who they have a problem with and are completely ignorant and unaware.

Originally Posted by MarcusMel (Post 7140579)

Not that Ash or Helen care that 10,000 of it vanished leaving Chris open to public vote and eviction. Not like they took time to show sorrow and regret at his plight of no extra money and being up for eviction when he might not have been.

Did they really take time to find out how he felt about the agreement. What would it have looked like and how would they have behaved if he had refused to put his hand to the 'pact'

Did Chris look like he cared if he had the money or was he really just making a 'point' at how dreadful its been living with the cool gang?

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7140005)

You wont be saying that when one of them goes tomorrow

Originally Posted by Daffodil (Post 7141368)

Chris is a twisted little man. Have a look at his web-site.