trouble is that wastes even more millions of tax payers money

Heres a snippet from the long suffering innocent jim Davidson, falsely accused by a pack of gold digging liars who got off unnamed unashamed and unimprisoned...jim lost 100s of thousands of pounds, 2 years of his career, reputation in tatters life destroyed


"It was once that in merry old England you got a fair trial. Not any more. In their rush to increase the conviction rate, the government of the day, with David (himself the subject of sex scandal) Blunkett as the Justice Minister, decided to breach Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, by taking away the presumption of innocence. This was achieved in subtle fashion by taking away the warning to Juries, "about the dangers of convicting a person on the unsupported say so of of a claimant." Thus, any person making a gold-digging [false] claim of abuse, will be believed, because the trial judge has not told them differently. After that little ruse and other amendments in the Sexual Offences Act 2003, the conviction rate soared - filling our prisons with many innocent men in the process. Did you say "prats?", If you did, we tend to agree. So come on all you claimants, why not accuse a politician of giving you one up the rear? Give them a taste of their own medicine. There is no need for proof and it won't matter if when they inspect your anal passage that they find no evidence of trauma - believe us, that will be put down to some incredible healing power. Bull****! But that is what is happening out there today. It's true."



When it come to historical allegations, there is almost no chance of mounting a defence. Any witnesses to provide an alibi will long since have forgotten about dates and times. Your own diaries will have been thrown away and other information such as telephone bills, etc, will be long gone.

are you saying that if a girl loves a boy she can't be raped by the boy she loved? do you know that the vast majority of rapes happen from a man that a girl trusts?

mot rapes hoopoe between a woman and a man that she trusts. most rapes happen from a husband raping his wife or a boyfriend raping his girlfriend.

people still have this silly idea that rapes happen in dark parking lots, or back alleys, but it's not true. a woman is most likely to be raped in her own bed by someone she trusts.

so what if they were stupid and naive, do stupid and naive people deserve to be raped?

this man is a celebrity, and many women felt like they could trust him, or like they knew him, the way we all feel like we know celebrities.

even jimmy tarbuck, got the trick treatment, a woman said that he and his road managers, sexually assaulted her in his dressing room on top of the pops, in london, in 1963, but most people will know, that TOTP, started in 1964, and the studio was in the city of manchester, for three years, and tarbuck never appeared on the show, this was backed up by records and people who worked on the show, this person got the city, year, studio address, wrong, and the police failed to catch on, for nearly 12 months, jim davidson like tarbuck, and others, got police raids at 5am in the morning, with 14 officers and yes, the media standing near their homes, then the mock trial begains, with computers, and other things taken away, in plastic boxes, the police say that they can't crack down on crime, but they seem to have the manpower to do a PR maneuver to do this for along time.