| Mystic Mock |
07-12-2014 05:54 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayllelujah
(Post 7408557)
First of all, X Factor is an entertainment programme. Therefore, that includes performances. And performances are often when someone puts on a good show by singing and dancing. If you want to watch a singing contest with no gimmicks, go and watch The Voice on BBC1.
Fleur was the only one that did uptempo because she IS the only one that can do uptempo. Lauren failed miserably last week at Clarity, Ben's voice is only suited to rocker-ish songs, and Andrea just hits ballads every week. None of them can dance as good as Fleur, so why even try and bother? Can you imagine how dull and slow the final will be without her.
And when it gets to final 5, the running order always switches about for the second performances, so I'm not really sure why you're crying over that like it's some massive attempt to rig Lauren out of the competition :shrug: Not sure how we've been forced a Fleur win when her audition wasn't even shown and no one knew who she was until Judges Houses :conf:
You are a lost cause, there's no point explaining all this stuff to you as you are dead set on trying to make Lauren look like the best thing since sliced bread.
|
Yes you said singing in your post along with dancing didn't you?
And Lauren failed on one uptempo out of 3 attempts that she's made, yes she can't dance but she's not that type of singer.
Just because Fleur does uptempos does not make her automatically entertaining either like a lot of people seem to always think with the Olly/Rylan acts every year.
And you honestly don't think that Lauren performing on 3rd, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, and 1st in the running order is not really bad considering she's very likely to succeed away from the show?
And how would you know how Ben and Andrea would do with a dance routine? They've never been tested because they're meant to be your dull males compared to the amazing Fleur that slays every week. |
