ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB15 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=660)
-   -   Jeremy Jackson Was BB right to remove Jeremy? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=269917)

Jose Mourinho 10-01-2015 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7467182)
He was wrong and deserved to be punished somehow but not evicted. Ill give him his dues though, he didn't try to wriggle out of it, he stood up and took his punishment. Chloe milked it and I think she might regret it in time.

Finally I agree with you Sir.

Vicky. 10-01-2015 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jose Mourinho (Post 7467020)
I think they removed him because ultimately they thought he was too unstable WITH the drink around him etc.

Surely they should have thought of this before putting him in? Its no secret thats hes ****ed up :laugh:

Same with Callum really...I dont feel its right to surround a 'recovering/recovered' alcoholic with so much booze. Especially spirits.

I'm sure Denise (?) was a former alkie too, who turned to her old ways with the amount of drink available in there

Raph 10-01-2015 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drew. (Post 7466706)
The whole things been blown out of proportion but he is still in the wrong and BB don't have much choice but to chuck him out really

This unfortunately

Jose Mourinho 10-01-2015 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 7467195)
Surely they should have thought of this before putting him in? Its no secret thats hes ****ed up :laugh:

Same with Callum really...I dont feel its right to surround a 'recovering/recovered' alcoholic with so much booze. Especially spirits.

I'm sure Denise (?) was a former alkie too, who turned to her old ways with the amount of drink available in there

100% But in fairness sometimes shows like these can turn peoples lives around. Possibly what they were thinking.

arista 10-01-2015 10:31 PM

No

Chloe Over Played it
Fact

armand.kay 10-01-2015 11:10 PM

Firstly want to say that I completely understand Chloe's reaction and I'm in no way placing any blame on her. However I don't think Jeremy did what he did not knowing she was naked underneath her robe and I believe he made a genuine mistake. I also want to point out the double standards with big brothers decision. In cbb9 Denise had purposely pulled down karrissa's pants exposing her butt in front of everyone and all big brother did was give her a warning and most people on here, bots and in the house (because they hated the twins) said that karissa was over reacting and even laughed at her claiming that she has no right to be upset because she's a playboy model who has shown her butt before, some were even posting pictures of her showing her butt and using them to justify Denise's actions. Imo what Denise did was far worse than what Jeremy has done so I fail to see how one is kicked of and hated and the other is only given a warning and goes on to win.

mr rochester 10-01-2015 11:14 PM

He needed to go - he should never have been allowed in in the first place...

bots 10-01-2015 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by armand.kay (Post 7467504)
Firstly want to say that I completely understand Chloe's reaction and I'm in no way placing any blame on her. However I don't think Jeremy did what he did not knowing she was naked underneath her robe and I believe he made a genuine mistake.

This is the bit that doesn't ring true for me I'm afraid. So why then did he do it, to look at her bra or teeshirt? I don't think so. He may not of thought she was naked underneath but he sure was hoping she was.

armand.kay 10-01-2015 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 7467527)
This is the bit that doesn't ring true for me I'm afraid. So why then did he do it, to look at her bra or teeshirt? I don't think so. He may not of thought she was naked underneath but he sure was hoping she was.

Yeah watching back his explanation in the bathroom (I didn't hear the first time) it seems a bit more sleezy than I first though.

Vicky. 10-01-2015 11:35 PM

He knew/hoped she was naked. However I genuinely do think he thought she was flirting.

Though quite why anyone would flirt with someone who had just been vomitting is beyond me :umm2:

newsbb 10-01-2015 11:39 PM

i think it has been blown over proportion...

RockBottom 10-01-2015 11:44 PM

He should be in a psych ward not big brother. He seems very unstable due to long term drug and alcohol abuse. I feel really bad for Chloe. There is no way he should have stayed.

rionablue 10-01-2015 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Llewyn (Post 7466621)
God no, Chole is just milking this, I mean come on she loves the money too show her tits off usually, she is just pissed he got to see them for free. Pathetic *****.

That is quite simply AN AWFUL thing to say. What Jeremy did to someone who was genuinely trying to help him was TOTALLY out of order. Why oh why oh why do you blame the girl and to call her a *****. She admitted in the diary room she is a page 3 girl and that was her choice to work in that area. It wasn't her CHOICE tonight for Jeremy to do what he did !!!!!!!!!!!

Tom4784 10-01-2015 11:54 PM

BB was right to eject him, it was an assault and he didn't really seem all that sorry for it to me. He shouldn't have been in the house in the first place though, he obviously isn't well.

It does sicken me that people are blaming Chloe for this, just because you don't like someone doesn't make them any less of a victim if something bad happens to them.

rionablue 10-01-2015 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tanussa (Post 7466689)
I think chloe blew the whole thing out of proportion, which inevitably esculated throughout the house

So you would have been ok for a man to touch you when you were only trying to help him right?????????????????? I certainly wouldn't have been and I would also be in tears as up to then she had got on fine with Jeremy and her and the girls had been there trying to make sure he was ok.

rionablue 11-01-2015 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 7467070)
I don't think they could do anything but evict him but I do feel a little sympathy for him because he's going to be labelled a sex pest now. It sounds more like a drunk fumble than anything though he should not have touched. I do think Chloe was stupid to be alone in the toilet with him what was that about, couldn't she help from a distance with the door open rather than getting right in there with his vom.

Three of the girls were in there with him. When they went out she told them to keep the door open. Watch the show again if you don't believe me. For some reason they let it close. it was then that the incident happened. This is what the girl gets for trying to be helpful.

Northern Monkey 11-01-2015 12:57 AM

Did Hazel get ejected for pulling Daley's boxers down?No and that is much worse than Jeremy moving Chloes robe slightly near her boob.
He made a mistake while heavily intoxicated.
When Chloe said "that's not ok" then that should've been the end of it.He knew then that he'd read the situation wrong.However Chloe running out of the toilet crying and milking it as much as possible was highly unnecessary and Perez getting in on the action to take the lime light saying "i don't feel safe"....WTF?He should not have been ejected just as Hazel or Denise were'nt.He was stupid but he got stitched up big time.

MB. 11-01-2015 01:02 AM

He's got a problem with drink that led to the event tonight. If he'd been kept in, and continued to have access to booze, something worse could have happened. It isn't a simple case of 'oh, sorry, I'll just keep away from the drink now' - the man's struggled with addiction for a lot of his life. It'd have been stupid for Channel 5 to take the risk and keep him in there.

LukeB 11-01-2015 01:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MB. (Post 7467935)
He's got a problem with drink that led to the event tonight. If he'd been kept in, and continued to have access to booze, something worse could have happened. It isn't a simple case of 'oh, sorry, I'll just keep away from the drink now' - the man's struggled with addiction for a lot of his life. It'd have been stupid for Channel 5 to take the risk and keep him in there.

you made a very good point here :clap1:

MojoNixon 11-01-2015 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 7466574)
Was BB right to remove Jeremy?

Yes. Little perv.

Lwize 11-01-2015 01:23 AM

Jeremy's behavior was unacceptable, and being drunk isn't a valid excuse.
BB took the appropriate action, even if Chloe's reaction could be viewed as excessive.

Ken is riding a fine line, but he'll likely be voted out on Tuesday anyway.

Rob! 11-01-2015 01:29 AM

I don't think so.

I just can't help but think mountains were made out of mole hills. I'm not denying Chloe was upset by what had happened, but the fact that she was borderline hyperventilating from the experience tells me that she was just as pissed as Jeremy was. It wasn't something he was likely to repeat but I wonder if there was more to his removal than just the incident in the loos - he did seem a tad warped at times. Maybe best for himself that he was taken out at this stage.

Ninastar 11-01-2015 03:01 AM

Watching this on channel 5 now and I have very mixed feelings about this.

I believe he should have been ejected but mainly because of how upset Chloe was. We don't know what exactly happened (apart from that he did open her dressing gown) and I think he has serious problems. I felt so bad for Chloe (I think she's had something happen to her in the past... so I think whatever happened in the bathroom triggered her) but I also feel bad for Jeremy.

He is messed up. I don't know if he's on something, or just an alcoholic or what, but he clearly doesn't think straight. He said something about struggling to live and I know from personal experience that when you're in that state, you're completely not yourself.

I don't believe in sexual assault at all. It makes me angry to think that someone could think it's okay. But I don't think Jeremy meant it in a 'creepy' or 'pervy' way, if that makes sense.

It was right for him to be ejected, because of how upset Chloe was. I also think that something else would have happened to get him ejected if it wasn't this.

Sorry if this makes no sense... I'm kind of tipsy and tired too.

Mystic Mock 11-01-2015 03:04 AM

No for these reasons.

1. He was drunk.

2. He was a Housemate that was funny, without pissing me off.

3. We actually didn't get any footage of what he actually did.

4. Chloe behaving like a rape victim does make the case look dodgy.

5. He throught that she had a bathing suit on.

6. How many guys wouldn't rip her robes off? (that part being a joke of course)

LukeB 11-01-2015 03:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mockinator (Post 7468081)
No for these reasons.

1. He was drunk.

2. He was a Housemate that was funny, without pissing me off.

3. We actually didn't get any footage of what he actually did.

4. Chloe behaving like a rape victim does make the case look dodgy.

5. He throught that she had a bathing suit on.

6. How many guys wouldn't rip her robes off? (that part being a joke of course)

I see where you're coming from tbh, but was it wise for him to drink when he had an alcohol addiction?


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.