Yes I get that point and I fully agree. She can wear what she wants and should not have to fear anyone pulling open her robe...

but...

She is in a house with cameras in every room, watching every move, you have some quite lively characters in there also. So it would be so easy to see how a play fight, someone messing around or simply getting into bed it would be soooo easy for her to flash her ample breasts by accident. To me I don't get why she would knowing all this be naked under her robe!

Did she get involved in a play fight with this robe on or had she just been washing/showering before bed and heard Jeremy vomit before going to get ready?

Of course not. She must have been mastering the art of seduction.

THE POINT is that the robe wasn't opened by accident, it was purposely pulled open by Jeremy. What may or may not have happened by accident is completely besides the point.

I agree but to me I still do find it strange to be naked under a robe held together with just a belt on national TV but yes that's up to her of course.

She'd just come out of the bathroom, maybe after showering? Maybe she was on her way to get dressed into PJs or something? :shrug:

We can surmise about maybes all we want but the fact is she was going around the house helping drunken Americans in a bath robe naked underneath. Now of course she can do that if she likes but that does not seem to me like she was in any rush to get some underwear on which is also fine and her purgative but i find it strange behavior on national TV.

That doesn't even make sense.

I think that is a really low thing to say. You should be ashamed of yourself for that.

underneath bath robe I mean

We're all naked under our clothes, love.

and a robe is clothes so... she was wearing clothes!

I wouldn't pay to go to a strip joint where everyone is wearing dressing gowns!

£15 entrance fee
Girls naked under dressing gowns extravaganza!
Join us tonight!
Drink till you puke!
They may help you by passing you a loo roll fun!!!

That's EXACTLY what you're doing.

:laugh2:

Not going to say what I think was right or wrong. Just saying that a model in a robe, leaning over you, robe slightly gaping, you're a bit drunk. Would you, conceivably, try to flick that robe open without any other motivation apart from being a bit drunk?

I bet a few would.

:clap1:

That doesn't make it any more right or acceptable

:facepalm: Looks like I'm not much of an opportunist cuz I can definitely say I wouldn't be putting my hands on anyone unless I was sure they wanted me to.

Only the ones with terrible judgement/low morality

:joker::joker: Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form,:joker::joker: Of couse they would :wavey:

We're talking drunkenness here, and no, I'm not trying to justify anything, just saying, in a drunken state, not rational thinking state, can you honestly say you or anyone you know, wouldn't find it funny?

It's completely different, those pictures are there to admire, exposing someone isn't to be done without permission

Leaning over him? Was she?

:love:

It's a bit different tbh. Like when Chloe mentioned her page 3 modelling.

Those images are her choice to put in the public arena. Nothing to do with someone helping themselves to opening your clothes.

Yes ,she was