ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB15 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=660)
-   -   Ken removed - Nadia threatens to call the police - Article (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=270118)

Northern Monkey 12-01-2015 04:27 PM

Since when did saying arse get you kicked.It says he was kicked for 'offensive language'.

sampvt 12-01-2015 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake. (Post 7473973)
Why shouldn't she be allowed to hound him? 'Free speech' guys, remember?

Buy a dictionary, free speech is not the same as harassment.

Denver 12-01-2015 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake. (Post 7473973)
Why shouldn't she be allowed to hound him? 'Free speech' guys, remember?

Its not a criminal act for speaking your mind in britain however stalking lands you in a lot of trouble

Amy Jade 12-01-2015 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7473953)
Yeah, let's actually watch it before coming to all of our conclusions. :laugh:

It says Ken left the conversation to take over from Alicia on a task and Nadia followed him to a different part of the house.

Jake. 12-01-2015 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7473984)
Buy a dictionary, free speech is not the same as harassment.

It's harassment now? In that case, Ken's surely been harassing the younger females for the five past days? Nope, thought not.

Marsh. 12-01-2015 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7473976)
When some thought he was removed for racist comments ,they were happy to discuss it ,but not happy to discuss a pathetic reason ,and a vile bitch

No, we were discussing what had already been shown onscreen and possible reasons for his ejection.

Not jumping to conclusions about something that hasn't been aired yet based on a vague online article.

-Sue- 12-01-2015 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7473976)
When some thought he was removed for racist comments ,they were happy to discuss it ,but not happy to discuss a pathetic reason ,and a vile bitch

Are you on about ken? We don;t know fully why or in what context he was removed yet can we watch it first before passing judgement?

And as for the 'vile b*tch' is this still about the towel? :joker:

Cherie 12-01-2015 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7473936)
Who the **** does Nadia think she is? She should be removed for stalking

:clap1:

Marsh. 12-01-2015 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 7473991)
It says Ken left the conversation to take over from Alicia on a task and Nadia followed him to a different part of the house.

Yes, it says a lot of things that when watched in context could have a dozen different interpretations. It says they were talking at the table. Maybe they decided to take their conversation/debate private outside away from the group?

Yes, she may have followed him and started an argument but we won't know until we've watched it.

-Sue- 12-01-2015 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7474001)
Yes, it says a lot of things that when watched in context could have a dozen different interpretations. It says they were talking at the table. Maybe they decided to take their conversation/debate private outside away from the group?

Yes, she may have followed him and started an argument but we won't know until we've watched it.

Agreed and nicely put :D

Liam- 12-01-2015 04:31 PM

Nadia bringing the entertainment :clap1:

Cherie 12-01-2015 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyeballPaul (Post 7473982)
Since when did saying arse get you kicked.It says he was kicked for 'offensive language'.

I'm hoping he told Nadia where to go, would be worth getting booted out for:hehe:

MB. 12-01-2015 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7473989)
Its not a criminal act for speaking your mind in britain however stalking lands you in a lot of trouble

Look up stalking. Going after someone from one part of a house to another is nowhere near.

Blimey.

Denver 12-01-2015 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MB. (Post 7474010)
Look up stalking. Going after someone from one part of a house to another is nowhere near.

Blimey.

If you followed someone in real life you would be arrested for harrasment

Pincho Paxton 12-01-2015 04:33 PM

If it is hard to choose one of many things that Ken could have been kicked out for then that means that he deserved to be kicked out.

AnnieK 12-01-2015 04:33 PM

How would she call the police anyway. Has she smuggled a phone in :suspect:

Marsh. 12-01-2015 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7474017)
If you followed someone in real life you would be arrested for harrasment

No you wouldn't.

Following someone outside or into another room to continue a conversation or an argument is not stalking. :laugh:

Marsh. 12-01-2015 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 7474023)
How would she call the police anyway. Has she smuggled a phone in :suspect:

That's what those big panties were for. :think:

Jake. 12-01-2015 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7474017)
If you followed someone in real life you would be arrested for harrasment

And if Ken made some of the comments he's made to the wrong person he'd find himself in a lot more trouble than being arrested.

Pincho Paxton 12-01-2015 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AnnieK (Post 7474023)
How would she call the police anyway. Has she smuggled a phone in :suspect:

It's up her huge....

...oh never-mind. I'll let Ken finish my sentence.

MB. 12-01-2015 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7474017)
If you followed someone in real life you would be arrested for harrasment

Yes, if you did so multiple times, without them knowing, with malicious intent. Following someone you live with from one room to the next isn't anything.

Denver 12-01-2015 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake. (Post 7474028)
And if Ken made some of the comments he's made to the wrong person he'd find himself in a lot more trouble than being arrested.

Apart from the racist slur he has done nothing that is bad

Kazanne 12-01-2015 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7474026)
That's what those big panties were for. :think:

She needs big panties to get that huge arse covered,Ooops sorry said arse:laugh:

Amy Jade 12-01-2015 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7474001)
Yes, it says a lot of things that when watched in context could have a dozen different interpretations. It says they were talking at the table. Maybe they decided to take their conversation/debate private outside away from the group?

Yes, she may have followed him and started an argument but we won't know until we've watched it.

Nadia is a twat it's pretty much a done deal she went after him. She's a horrible bitch

Marsh. 12-01-2015 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 7474057)
She needs big panties to get that huge arse covered,Ooops sorry said arse:laugh:

:nono: Bitch! :fist:


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.