People voting that they aren't are blatant misogynists, especially considering that the OP said to vote using the definitions provided.

This is another reason that people hate 'feminists'

There is absolutely no need for petty name calling just because people might not believe in the same thing as you. This is the main thing I hate about internet logic and it's the main reason I never cared for 'feminism' in the first place.

How about instead of calling people pathetic names which are all just your opinion, try and inspire them and educate them like others have done in this thread. I don't think people who don't believe in 'feminism' are 'blatant misogynists' as you say. If you read what half of them said, you'll find that they are very open minded and understanding indeed.

Yes I am a feminist and it's important to note that there are many types of feminists, not just radical raving mid life crisis divorcees that hate men. And yes that is a stereotype. And it has ruined the image of feminism because that's all people picture, it's almost a dirty word or thing to be associated with and that's wrong.

well go look it up in a dictionary, or on google, it's the definition :umm2:


I can understand the reason people don't like the word feminism, because it's more striving towards full equality, but it's still women which are more oppressed then men, so :shrug:

Sorry, but how are men oppressed more than women?

Women in some parts of the world can't even leave the house without a man by their side and if they do they're punished :umm2:

So if I make a poll saying "are you a neo-nazi yes/no" and then follow it up by saying "in this poll, neo-nazi means a lovely fair person who believes in peace and equality for all"

...

Will you vote yes, or no? If you vote no then you are racist.

" The advocacy of women’s rights on the grounds of the equality of the sexes." - Oxford

As I said before there's more than a slight irony in talking about equality when the definition itself is not equal, by only mentioning women. I advocate women's AND men's rights on the grounds of equality. The definition above suggests that there are no imbalances that favour women and (in the western world) that is simply false. There may be MORE imbalances favouring men, but that is irrelevant, if they exist at all the other way around then only mentioning women's rights in regard to equality is questionable.

If feminism is truly about pure equality, then it is a misnomer. I am not a feminist unless I can also, at the same time, be a "masculist". I would much rather there was a term that encompassed both without using needless gender-based terminology.

Well TS if you believe in gender equality, you're a feminist, you may not like it, but you are. And yep you can be a masculist, however I don't believe masculism strives for equality.

Also do you get just as upset about the word mankind, or is that fine because it's a male word?

Because... who says so? You? I'm sorry but I disagree. I'm certainly not by the dictionary definition, as I pointed out above, and also, it is not insignificant that the word has been "hijacked". I reserve the right to refrain from referring to myself as a feminist - the word has been poisoned. I haven't voted on the poll at all for that reason - I'm hesitant to vote "no" because the implication then is that I don't believe in rights for women, but I refuse to arbitrarily refer to myself as "a feminist" (or as anything else, for that matter) just because a forum poll or a dubious definition says that I "must".

What it amounts to, ironically, is anti-male point scoring. "You HAVE to call yourself a feminist, so HAH!"

"You don't believe" that it strives for equality so you wouldn't use that word. The dictionary definition, and the exact etymology, of the word is identical to feminism only advocating rights for males. Nothing more, nothing less. The point, though, is that I wouldn't use the word at all because I am aware of the connotations. Likewise, I don't believe that "modern feminism" strives for equality, either, hence I don't use the word "feminist" to describe myself.

Either way - apparently it's OK for you to reject the word "Masculist" but NOT OK for me to reject the word "Feminist"? Massive double standard.


I don't get "upset" about the term "feminist", I just wouldn't refer to myself as one. It's also a bit contentious because whilst, yes, the word "mankind" is obviously focussed on the "male" in terms of etymology, it does actually in modern usage refer to all humans without exception. Feminism - despite the spammed (and cherry picked) dictionary definitions in this thread - is demonstrably NOT always focussed on equality for both genders. The word might be used as such by many people, but it is a FACT that there are large groups flying the banner of feminism who have absolutely no interest in "equality". The word has become a symbol and that symbol has been corrupted by people with other agendas. "You may not like it, but it has".

For the record, though... I personally would choose the word "humanity" over "mankind".

yes, the word "mankind" is obviously focussed on the "male" in terms of etymology, it does actually in modern usage refer to all humans without exception.

Yes due to the patriarchy of setting men before women, the correct term is humankind.

tried five guys today, hotdog and chips. very expensive but very good.

It's taking me way too long to figure out how this relates to the topic.

I give up. Tell me. :laugh:

not a feminist then? :think:

I also think 'humankind' is a better phrase as it is equal for both genders.Feminist is certainly not and i do believe in equality for men and women but i am not feminist.I am an 'equalist'.Equality for both sexes.

An Equaliser :think:

Lol no.That would imply that i have the power to make things equal,I don't unfortunately.Or it would imply that i am Edward Woodward,Not him either.

read my posts again, in western society I said men are FAR FAR MORE oppressed than women...not in backwards neanderthal middle eastern countries...these are 2 totally different worlds

All of the people here who identify as being feminist want equality. We're not trying to trick you here, or get you to sell your soul, we are simply stating that we are feminists and we want equality between the genders. There is no need for us to cherry pick definitions, we're happy with the word. If it's a label you don't like at all, fine, I'll never think of you as a feminist again.

And the masculism groups I've encountered online are nothing like feminism, they actually come across as antifeminist groups, while feminist groups tackle issues in society that effect us all, masculism groups seem to only want to tackle feminism. So I don't reject you calling yourself one of those at all, I only mentioned that they don't stand for equality, because they don't seem interested in that. And if you look at it this way, in a patriarchal society, if you try to increase the rights of women, you will come to a state of equality, however if you just focus on male rights, then the society becomes more unfair.

I don't think anyone HERE is looking for anything but equality but to say that no one flying the banner of feminism - rightly or not - is actually seeking female supremacy just isn't true. And if you haven't encountered THOSE women / groups online... Then you haven't been looking very hard. They are everywhere, especially all over Social Networking. Of course you're right about the masculist groups being anti-feminism but, again, that's actually part of my reason for not using those terms. These groups are a backlash against what is seen as aggressive feminist groups seeking to redress the imbalance between men and women by "beating men down" rather than elevating women. I fully believe that if groups seeking gender equality were to rebrand in a gender-neutral manner, there would be FAR fewer of these male "backlash" groups. Being unwilling to even consider it seems somewhat stubborn, like there is some sort of problem with removing the "fem" from "feminism", which strangely is sort of... Sexist.

Anyway, my point is that I am NOT a masculist for the same reasons that I am not a feminist. I believe in equality - therefore, I must either be both, or neither. I am neither.

Again, I disagree. This assumes that there are zero examples of women having more rights, or being treated preferentially to, men... Which is simply untrue. I'm not denying that we have a somewhat patriarchal society and I fully accept that women receive unfair treatment more often than men, but so say that it's "always" the case is just false. If you only focus on increasing the rights of women, you will NEVER achieve equality, because there ARE areas that need attention for men. Family law has been used as an example here, and I will use my example from earlier again - in TV / Movies is is still "acceptable" to show a female character hitting / slapping, even punching, her partner as "comedy". The man takes his beating and then usually still stands there with a guilty look on his face like "yup, I deserved that because I was bad!". Can you - honestly - imagine a film that features a male lead character punching his wife in the face, and it being seen as anything but horrific / disgusting? Of course not. Group of women sitting around discussing men's tiny peenies / sexual ineptitude? Funny! Men sitting around discussing women in that way? BOOOO how awful!

Men do - on occasion - get the raw deal. To reiterate, I don't agree with "The Truth", I don't think men have it worse or even as bad, but I do KNOW that there are two sides to the coin and that purely elevating women without addressing sexism against men will never result in equality. And that's why feminism is a misnomer.

We should not be focussing on the "rights of women" or the "rights of men" at all. We should be focussing on the rights of PEOPLE, blind to gender, and ensuring that those rights are equal for EVERY person. Feminism is the wrong word and, even with the best of intentions, clinging to it is counter productive. It breeds resentment, misunderstanding, division and prompts exactly the sort of back-lash groups you mentioned.

Just LETTING you KNOW that I READ your POST, you're NOT a FEMINIST, I get it!!

This was supposed to be in the "what's for lunch" thread oops

Kthx awesome.

Unless we are looking up definitions on an American website or using an American dictionary or all of a sudden we are all Americans no it isnt you are wrong.

The definition of feminist in the Oxford English Dictionary is:
"A person who supports feminism."

The definition of feminism in the Oxford English Dictionary is:
"The advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes."

Of course i support gender equality who in their right mind wouldn't but the feminist cause was long ago hijacked by women angry at their failed relationships and taking it out on the world which soiled that entire movement a long time ago so i voted no.

A gender equality movement i think would be a better term.

Ok but yet again you didn't explain HOW men are more oppressed, please do explain

In it's most basic form yes, it's the Misandrists that hijack Feminism that can put me against it sometimes.

I've never really been a part of the feminist movement. I enjoy being a woman and I also enjoy good manners in a gentleman. If a man gives up his seat or opens a door for me I always thank them very nicely, because good manners should have some acknowledgement.
Having said that, I stand up for myself, don't ask a man to do what I am capable of doing myself and don't expect preferential treatment because I am a woman.
What I can't stand is the type of woman who bleats about inequality in the sexes, but then uses a 'helpless kitten' approach to getting what she wants from a man.