ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB15 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=660)
-   -   Things get heated over Katie P's disabled son (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=272281)

Denver 29-01-2015 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544833)
Ok so everyomne in her manor is getting aid to send their kids to schools on a 100 mile trip with their own personal drivers and nurses. Well for a start, if he has his own driver as she stated, I would like to know how the cost of 1000 a day is reached or is that what she s charging the gov. Fooking graet job her driver has, 7000 quid a week less expenses like petrol and a silly hat.

Harvey gets a fooking paid for taxi, the driver bit is bollocks and pricey didn't think before she spoke. I

The reason Katie needs a driver for Harvey is because he needs nurses with him so it all comes at a cost

Katie takes the other kids to school herself

I dont understand what your not getting?

bots 29-01-2015 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 7544832)
Good God,have we even seen the scenario yet? looks like people have made their minds up already,that figures.I will wait and see or id this just the tail end of the convo the other night.people swearing and getting irate,just why?

My point was that KH didn't need to focus in on a housemates child as a topic of argument ... it seems to have taken its own life since then :shrug:

Denver 29-01-2015 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 7544838)
Really, you think those are the only options?! What about the other disabled kids who are having to move house due to the bedroom tax (and disabled people are NOT excluded as the government claims btw). About disabled adults/kids who are losing their dla entitlements because of cuts also...etc.

Your missing the point in that id rather it go to someone who needs it then someone who dont need it they just abuse it

sampvt 29-01-2015 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544844)
The reason Katie needs a driver for Harvey is because he needs nurses with him so it all comes at a cost

Katie takes the other kids to school herself

I dont understand what your not getting?

your info is wrong. a nurse can go in a taxi mate, he doesent have a driver, that's crap. that katies gaff, she paralleled her trips to harveys and used the 1000 and the driver as a plug

Denver 29-01-2015 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544859)
your info is wrong. a nurse can go in a taxi mate, he doesent have a driver, that's crap. that katies gaff, she paralleled her trips to harveys and used the 1000 and the driver as a plug

He needs special requirements within the car FGS

Kazanne 29-01-2015 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 7544846)
My point was that KH didn't need to focus in on a housemates child as a topic of argument ... it seems to have taken its own life since then :shrug:

Maybe she was making conversation,maybe she was interested or maybe she is curious how someone with such wealth does that,we don't know,but it's telling to me that when people curse and get angry there is more than a bit of truth going on there.(not a pop at you btw) I just don't get the overreaction for people we don't even know:shrug:

Vicky. 29-01-2015 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544852)
Your missing the point in that id rather it go to someone who needs it then someone who dont need it they just abuse it

And you are missing the point that I am making too tbh. Possibly as you are getting slightly hysterical at what you see as me putting katie price down. Which is not what I am doing at all. I dont doubt that she is entitled to help. I simply disagree with someone with her wealth getting it for something such as a taxi to school tbh...whilst others with nothing are having all of their help removed under the guise of 'cuts'. Shes not wrong for taking what offered, however they system is wrong to allow it in the first place. IMO of course.

sampvt 29-01-2015 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544864)
He needs special requirements within the car FGS

yes a seat is pretty unusual isn't it. he is able of limb, sight impaired, normally respertory and has dietary complications. in other words he can walk and move unaided but requires guidance. you make him sound like steven hawkins

Denver 29-01-2015 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544897)
yes a seat is pretty unusual isn't it. he is able of limb, sight impaired, normally respertory and has dietary complications. in other words he can walk and move unaided but requires guidance. you make him sound like steven hawkins

You do realise sometimes he has to use a wheel chair? he also can kick off over the slightest of things so the nurses need space to advoid this happening

sampvt 29-01-2015 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544907)
You do realise sometimes he has to use a wheel chair? he also can kick off over the slightest of things so the nurses need space to advoid this happening

he has a chair at home and one at school, he does not need one in a fooking car

Denver 29-01-2015 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544915)
he has a chair at home and one at school, he does not need one in a fooking car

I find your views preety dam disguisting and its quite obvious its all because you dislike her not any other BS you might what to bring up

GiRTh 29-01-2015 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 7544896)
And you are missing the point that I am making too tbh. Possibly as you are getting slightly hysterical at what you see as me putting katie price down. Which is not what I am doing at all. I dont doubt that she is entitled to help. I simply disagree with someone with her wealth getting it for something such as a taxi to school tbh...whilst others with nothing are having all of their help removed under the guise of 'cuts'. Shes not wrong for taking what offered, however they system is wrong to allow it in the first place. IMO of course.

This.

poppsywoppsy 29-01-2015 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 7544582)
aw I think that's really unfair actually. From what I can see she's a fantastic mother to that child and most mothers talk about their kids alot, I know i do :shrug:

For a long time, Katie P only showed huge amounts love towards Harvey but fantastic mother is going a bit far.

No doubt she loves him and her other children, but her lifestyle, the unsuitable men she had in her house when her children were there were not that of a fantastic mother. Her flashing her huge bosom at every opportunity, her many many holidays leaving Harvey with his carers, Yes her work some of it but falling out of nightclubs half cut and her really nasty persona when married to Peter, were not the actions of a fantastic mother.

Wouldn't a multi millionaire mother provide all her sons needs, she could pay for his traveling expenses from the interest on her millions, or a tax refund, what other things are more important, Pink Range Rovers, designer tat, diamond rings but she doesn't want to pay for her own sons transport.

I would provide transport in a minute, I used to take my disabled little girl and a baby in a push chair on the bus for her physio and paid for it myself when we didn't have a car.

Katie Price is a grasper, it isn't what you put in, it is more like do you really need what you take out.

GiRTh 29-01-2015 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy (Post 7544947)
For a long time, Katie P only showed huge amounts love towards Harvey but fantastic mother is going a bit far.

No doubt she loves him and her other children, but her lifestyle, the unsuitable men she had in her house when her children were there were not that of a fantastic mother. Her flashing her huge bosom at every opportunity, her many many holidays leaving Harvey with his carers, Yes her work some of it but falling out of nightclubs half cut and her really nasty persona when married to Peter, were not the actions of a fantastic mother.

Wouldn't a multi millionaire mother provide all her sons needs, she could pay for his traveling expenses from the interest on her millions, or a tax refund, what other things are more important, Pink Range Rovers, designer tat, diamond rings but she doesn't want to pay for her own sons transport.

I would provide transport in a minute, I used to take my disabled little girl and a baby in a push chair on the bus for her physio and paid for it myself when we didn't have a car.

Katie Price is a grasper, it isn't what you put in, it is more like do you really need what you take out.

:clap1:

Says it all for me :joker:

sampvt 29-01-2015 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544939)
I find your views preety dam disguisting and its quite obvious its all because you dislike her not any other BS you might what to bring up

Ill forgive you for being rude but if you google Harveys ailments you might have a different view and just for the record. Katie said that she got funding because if she had to pay, it would cost her 1000 quid. She never mentioned that her driver drove Harvey and never said she got 1000 in aid. Everyone else seems to be shooting that line. my stance is simple, her private life should be exactly that, private. end of.

Amy Jade 29-01-2015 04:59 PM

Katie Price gets money for Harvey?

Denver 29-01-2015 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy (Post 7544947)
For a long time, Katie P only showed huge amounts love towards Harvey but fantastic mother is going a bit far.

No doubt she loves him and her other children, but her lifestyle, the unsuitable men she had in her house when her children were there were not that of a fantastic mother. Her flashing her huge bosom at every opportunity, her many many holidays leaving Harvey with his carers, Yes her work some of it but falling out of nightclubs half cut and her really nasty persona when married to Peter, were not the actions of a fantastic mother.

Wouldn't a multi millionaire mother provide all her sons needs, she could pay for his traveling expenses from the interest on her millions, or a tax refund, what other things are more important, Pink Range Rovers, designer tat, diamond rings but she doesn't want to pay for her own sons transport.

I would provide transport in a minute, I used to take my disabled little girl and a baby in a push chair on the bus for her physio and paid for it myself when we didn't have a car.

Katie Price is a grasper, it isn't what you put in, it is more like do you really need what you take out.

Why should she put millions in for people to bone idle to work and not be able to take it back out? She cant win either way

sampvt 29-01-2015 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy (Post 7544947)
For a long time, Katie P only showed huge amounts love towards Harvey but fantastic mother is going a bit far.

No doubt she loves him and her other children, but her lifestyle, the unsuitable men she had in her house when her children were there were not that of a fantastic mother. Her flashing her huge bosom at every opportunity, her many many holidays leaving Harvey with his carers, Yes her work some of it but falling out of nightclubs half cut and her really nasty persona when married to Peter, were not the actions of a fantastic mother.

Wouldn't a multi millionaire mother provide all her sons needs, she could pay for his traveling expenses from the interest on her millions, or a tax refund, what other things are more important, Pink Range Rovers, designer tat, diamond rings but she doesn't want to pay for her own sons transport.

I would provide transport in a minute, I used to take my disabled little girl and a baby in a push chair on the bus for her physio and paid for it myself when we didn't have a car.

Katie Price is a grasper, it isn't what you put in, it is more like do you really need what you take out.

Thank god a great post for a change, well done.

Denver 29-01-2015 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544957)
Ill forgive you for being rude but if you google Harveys ailments you might have a different view and just for the record. Katie said that she got funding because if she had to pay, it would cost her 1000 quid. She never mentioned that her driver drove Harvey and never said she got 1000 in aid. Everyone else seems to be shooting that line. my stance is simple, her private life should be exactly that, private. end of.

My view is any parent of disabled children no matter how wealthy they are should be entitled to help as it is best for the child needs

Denver 29-01-2015 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 7544962)
Katie Price gets money for Harvey?

He gets it for his own needs

Amy Jade 29-01-2015 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544970)
He gets it for his own needs

I'm not judging just I thought because she is like a millionaire she wouldn't get help?

sampvt 29-01-2015 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7544968)
My view is any parent of disabled children no matter how wealthy they are should be entitled to help as it is best for the child needs

FFS please tell me what you are drinking I think I need a glass of it. Where or when have I ever said she isn't entitled, of course she is but only for what the gov outlays, not for a private driver and a private nurse. He needs a taxi and a state registered carer not nigel mansel and Gregory house in a specially converted limo for his 50 mile 90 min journey.

sampvt 29-01-2015 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 7544974)
I'm not judging just I thought because she is like a millionaire she wouldn't get help?

Ooh I wish I had your tact, :laugh: nice one

poppsywoppsy 29-01-2015 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544957)
Ill forgive you for being rude but if you google Harveys ailments you might have a different view and just for the record. Katie said that she got funding because if she had to pay, it would cost her 1000 quid. She never mentioned that her driver drove Harvey and never said she got 1000 in aid. Everyone else seems to be shooting that line. my stance is simple, her private life should be exactly that, private. end of.

Katie Prices private?

She would go bankrupt:laugh:

Denver 29-01-2015 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7544981)
FFS please tell me what you are drinking I think I need a glass of it. Where or when have I ever said she isn't entitled, of course she is but only for what the gov outlays, not for a private driver and a private nurse. He needs a taxi and a state registered carer not nigel mansel and Gregory house in a specially converted limo for his 50 mile 90 min journey.

The chances are she made a rough figure as she doesnt have her paperwork in there with her


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.