Im not a chloe fan, shes my least favourite excluding danny and cristian,

i like to ask questions when im unsure on the answer.. I guess the best answer on here, for me was; its hypocritical for her to get mad at others.. and i understand that now.. i still dont think its hypocritical for her to take the money though, it really was hers to give, choosing not to is irrelevant.

The only point I made was that the public is always far more critical of women than men, and the public always waits for an opportunity to take down a female front runner. Corin, Alex, Deana, Gina, Ashleigh, and now Chloe. This is nothing new.

Omg preach

hypocrite-a person who claims or pretends to have certain beliefs about what is right but who behaves in a way that disagrees with those beliefs

Belief - Did not like people taking money from the prize fund
Action - Took £5k that was offered to her by Big Brother and was not from the prize fund

This excuse is really weak :laugh:

Its exactly the same thing..the money she took was going to be part of the prize fund, but she took it :shrug:

Again. It is a big majority of women that vote. Are you saying that your fellow women are wrong?

yep, this is how. :)

You are reaching for the stars here. It was a very hypocritical move of her.

Disagree atm, I'll wait for the highlights to make my mind completely but by the sound of it one is basically stealing from the winner, the other is choosing not to give to the winner.

I agree it may be considered hypocritical of her to be mad at others and expect people to not be mad at her.. but the two scenarios are not the same at all to me.

Spot on, most bb voters are women yet when they turn on one of the sisterhood it's somehow "the menz" fault!

I'm saying that the public always looks for an opportunity to turn on a woman with a chance to win.

Thats basically semantics...

Its all part of the prize fund, as Jack pointed out in a moment of clarity the producers can do what they like with the fund and will ultimately make sure the amount they want as a prize will be left at the end in some form.

Nobody had any issue with her taking the money as indeed nobody care Sam took it. And it was clear cristian would have he looked gutted when he guessed wrong.

The issue which chloe herself still didnt grasp was she spent all week banging on about how she wanted everyone to play together to put money in the pot for the winner, literally making Jack and Joels like miserable with her constant moaning and going on about how shes not in it for the money and money changes people, but when it came to the crunch she grabbed the 5k with the thoughtful words of 'oh **** it' and smirked like a naughty kid when it was revealed before she turned on the water works when danny lost his temper (again)

As Danny himself said (and I hate the guy) its fine you took the money but everything you said all week now is useless.

That's such a cop out to be fair. Chloe has been a moaning bitch all week. Nothing to do with her being a woman just to do with her being a pain in the ass.

It absolutely makes her a hypocrite after telling everyone to make sure they add to the pot for the winner and not take anything out...then BB said' take £5,000 or add it to the pot'. She took it when she could have added to the pot that is why she is a hypocrite. I personally don't blame her but she has been so sanctimonious about the money in the last few days.

Chloe is definitely a hypocrite the same way Harry would have been a hypocrite if she had taken the money for herself. Then she cries when you point out something that she does wrong instead of owning up to it and apologising. I loved her as well. But that hypocritical cry baby quality of her is not on

Oh hai

The fact some morons on a survey don't understand what the word hypocrite means doesn't contribute anything to this debate, which is already over. The girl is a hypocrite.

There are, however, worse things in the world to be.

clearly understanding logic and what hypocrite means to the OP and some people who voted on that poll is too hard.

I think most people know what hypocritical means... I think most people saw the two scenarios as different though

If chloe complained about Joel spending 2.5k on a pizza right before she spent 2k on a kebab, that would be hypocritical. Choosing not to contribute money isn't the same as spending it though, hence it isn't hypocritical to the majority of the viewers and I.