ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB16 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=663)
-   -   I am trying to fathom how Chloe won (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=285173)

Slevin 18-07-2015 09:52 AM

i thought she was alright then she proved herself to be a fake a pussy and the biggest hypocrite. **** that chipmunk. dont like it. eat a dick haha.

Robodog 18-07-2015 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8006670)
This is a woman who refused to condemn Helen's murderer/rapist comment to Brian.

How does she then win a popularity contest?

Maybe she refused to condemn it because she was in the minority who could actually see Helen's comment for what it was: a retaliation to Brian's third outburst of physical and verbal intimidation of Helen when he DID LOOK LIKE he wanted to kill her.

Chloe won because she was fair minded and took people as she found them, not following the herd.

She also won to be honest, because she was the best of a bad bunch. Had it been VOTE TO SAVE not EVICT, then the final 6 would have been full of more dynamic and interesting HMs and bless her, Chloe may well have been evicted earlier in the series.


.

ThriceShy 18-07-2015 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 8010707)
Maybe she refused to condemn it because she was in the minority who could actually see Helen's comment for what it was: a retaliation to Brian's third outburst of physical and verbal intimidation of Helen when he DID LOOK LIKE he wanted to kill her.

Chloe won because she was fair minded and took people as she found them, not following the herd.

She also won to be honest, because she was the best of a bad bunch. Had it been VOTE TO SAVE not EVICT, then the final 6 would have been full of more dynamic and interesting HMs and bless her, Chloe may well have been evicted earlier in the series.


.

No, she explained why she refused to condemn it. She said it was because Helen had "always been nice to me"

Robodog 18-07-2015 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8010771)
No, she explained why she refused to condemn it. She said it was because Helen had "always been nice to me"

Did she condemn Brian's aggressive outbursts?

ThriceShy 18-07-2015 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 8010781)
Did she condemn Brian's aggressive outbursts?

There were none to condemn. Everyone, including helen, has admitted that her behaviour was out of order. Only chloe thinks it is acceptable.

aman201 18-07-2015 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8006670)
This is a woman who refused to condemn Helen's murderer/rapist comment to Brian.

How does she then win a popularity contest?

Helen won last year.

There's your answer.

Amy Jade 18-07-2015 01:14 PM

she had the most votes :shrug:

Robodog 18-07-2015 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8010857)
There were none to condemn. Everyone, including helen, has admitted that her behaviour was out of order. Only chloe thinks it is acceptable.

NONE TO CONDEMN?? The man was being physically restrained whilst shouting abuse in Helen's face!! Did you not see it?

But i'll humour you for a moment:

So let's imagine that Brian was sitting there (like Helen was) and then imagine that HELEN had stood up to Brian and shouted 'SCUMBAG' etc at him, pointing in his face and having to be physically restrained by the other housemates, do you HONESTLY expect me to believe that yourself and other Helen bashers would all have said that there was nothing wrong with Helen's behaviour???????????

Bear in mind that these are the same Helen Bashers that are still bringing up her row with Matthew last year when she stood over Matthew while he was seated and insulted him - JUST LIKE BRIAN DID TO HER.

As i've said for weeks: it's one rule for Helen, one rule for everyone else.

The hypocrisy is unbelievable.

Robodog 18-07-2015 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8010857)
There were none to condemn. Everyone, including helen, has admitted that her behaviour was out of order. Only chloe thinks it is acceptable.

And yes, Helen did put her hands up and apologise for her poor choice of words in her retaliation to Brian's third aggressive outburst.

Which makes her infinitely more mature and fair than Brian who DID NOT apologise for his repeated verbal abuse and physical intimidation of her - all of which was STARTED by him in the first place!

I began this year's BB with Brian as one of my all time top BB housemates but his aggression and total lack of apology - or total failure to even ACKNOWLEDGE his abuse of Helen has put him way, way down in my estimations.

The fact Helen never played the victim card in the face of his aggression (she easily could have done), plus her ability to acknowledge her wrong-doings even when it was only in retaliation to Brian's verbal attack, has put Helen UP in my estimations.

Funny old game that BB is.

REDCROP 18-07-2015 02:11 PM

Twice Jack put her over himself in the cash bomb tasks. ..and last week Danny, Christian and Nick put her overs themselves in the killer nomination twist. ...she was everyone's biggest threat yet they all fell for little sister routine and handed her the money....one could respect her as a game player had it not been for her hypocrisy and the disloyalty and spite she showed Jack from the moment she realised the public had turned against him... a total fake with an over inflated sense of entitlement all wrapped up in the girl next door crap...I never fell for it from day one and think shes one of the most unpleasant winners we've ever had

rionablue 18-07-2015 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8006670)
This is a woman who refused to condemn Helen's murderer/rapist comment to Brian.

How does she then win a popularity contest?

Because she was the best of second best of a very bad lot of finalists this year.

ThriceShy 18-07-2015 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aman201 (Post 8010879)
Helen won last year.

There's your answer.


You could well be right and that is what scares me.

Of the originals, Chloe and joel were the closest to helen and licked her arse. And they were the top two.

ThriceShy 18-07-2015 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 8010928)
And yes, Helen did put her hands up and apologise for her poor choice of words in her retaliation to Brian's third aggressive outburst.

Which makes her infinitely more mature and fair than Brian who DID NOT apologise for his repeated verbal abuse and physical intimidation of her - all of which was STARTED by him in the first place!

I began this year's BB with Brian as one of my all time top BB housemates but his aggression and total lack of apology - or total failure to even ACKNOWLEDGE his abuse of Helen has put him way, way down in my estimations.

The fact Helen never played the victim card in the face of his aggression (she easily could have done), plus her ability to acknowledge her wrong-doings even when it was only in retaliation to Brian's verbal attack, has put Helen UP in my estimations.

Funny old game that BB is.

I never saw any aggression from Brian. He and Nicki were the victims.

ThriceShy 18-07-2015 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 8010922)
NONE TO CONDEMN?? The man was being physically restrained whilst shouting abuse in Helen's face!! Did you not see it?

But i'll humour you for a moment:

So let's imagine that Brian was sitting there (like Helen was) and then imagine that HELEN had stood up to Brian and shouted 'SCUMBAG' etc at him, pointing in his face and having to be physically restrained by the other housemates, do you HONESTLY expect me to believe that yourself and other Helen bashers would all have said that there was nothing wrong with Helen's behaviour???????????

Bear in mind that these are the same Helen Bashers that are still bringing up her row with Matthew last year when she stood over Matthew while he was seated and insulted him - JUST LIKE BRIAN DID TO HER.

As i've said for weeks: it's one rule for Helen, one rule for everyone else.

The hypocrisy is unbelievable.

No I didn't see it. Do you have a video you can link to?

JamesBond 18-07-2015 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 8010894)
she had the most votes :shrug:

Interesting theory, I like it.

bananarama 20-07-2015 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8006670)
This is a woman who refused to condemn Helen's murderer/rapist comment to Brian.

How does she then win a popularity contest?

Simple... Helen had done nothing to harm Chloe so why should Chloe get involved and take sides.

The hatred between Helen and Brian was there own doing and no sensible person would get involved.

Chloe won because as usual the public voted out the big characters. So called fans always vote out potential deserving winners.

What was left was a bunch of relatively quiet characters. The fans thought she was the best of the remaining bunch. Bobs your uncle......


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.