I still like Janice. I just find James annoying :worry:

You make very good points. My opinion on that CBB is different to yours and that is ok too.:wavey:

He was in the top 4 as well. And got a huge cheer from the audience when he saved Janice.

Yeah...he won't.

A question that was so 'ridiculous' he couldn't answer it and had to walk out of the room. I wonder why. :fan:

Yeah I suppose we can't all have the same favourites all the time. The forum would be very boring :hehe:

True. :wavey: Either way we are enjoying the show.:wavey:

James doesn't like to put anyone down unless it's his apparent best friend in the house :worry:

Unless he thinks it will play well with the audience. Slimeball.

okay but it's not like everything Austin does isn't driven by what he thinks the public perception will be lmfao come on

With you on that one Joey

Hope he wins, his chances have just gone up with slimeball James's betrayal.

There are some very strange opinions on here. Anyone who thinks Austin is a nice person clearly has a very strange sense of what is right and wrong.

I find him to be an obnoxious little twat tbh.

It happens over and over again when you think of some past winners/near winners. Bizarrely, right and wrong doesn't seem to come into it any more. Some see 'right' as boring and 'wrong' as enticing. Some like loud mouths, bullies, insults and rudeness and see them as qualities to be admired in a person because it makes that person 'real'. Can't see it myself, or the people I know in my own life must be figments of my imagination, but each to their own.

I can understand why some people don't like Austin, but he owned James tonight who couldn't argue his points without portraying himself as a victim.

And he saved us from suffering the most cheesy highlights that I've ever seen.

Oh yes because Austin thinks that arguing on a 50 year old woman and arguing on a straight white male privilege Housemate are winning moves, come on.:laugh:

And why are people using Helen and Jim as the lowest of the low winners when we've had Pete, Anthony, Rachel Rice, Sam Evans, Chloe, Paddy, and Alex Reid?

Oh and if she flooded the studio in her original series as much as she did in UBB then Cryandtelle would've been an horrific winner.

Would you say that Austin's a nasty person? I think that his inbetween both nice and nasty.

And I find it more strange that people think that it's okay for James to betray his friend just because they don't like his friend.

Like I said earlier, Austin's latest actions are really just him panicking because everything that he thought would work is blowing up in his face. He thought he could build James up and ride him to the end, but now it's working out in the exact opposite way.

And because Helen and Jim Davidson are legitimately awful people unlike a lot of the people you mentioned, but I know you're living in a world where Chloe is a nastier person than Farrah so I get why you're confused.

I think that you're confusing me for someone else as I've not said that Chloe was nastier than Farrah, her treatment of Jack was bad but not on Farrah's level.

And likability should always play secondry to entertainment, which the ones that I've listed was not as entertaining, plus they did have unlikable traits themselves, just because they're not as unlikable than two louder people still doesn't mean that you can't be the worst thing of all a nasty bore.

I'll tell you why....the question was so childish and provocative he didn't want to dignify it with an answer. I love that James walks away and refuses to be drawn in to Austin's taunts. :clap2:

Fruitloops
 

Austn wants a friendship where he can call all the shots. James is proving to be his own man and isn't going to toe the line. I respect James for that far more than I respect Austin's childish tantrums egged on by Jenna. What a **** stirrer that woman is.

Janice's is a special fruitloop and Austin needs to be a bit more understanding. Love her, she's hilarious.

You listed Chloe and a lot of other questionable choices like Michelle Visage (:joker:) in a thread literally titled "Has there ever been a nastier HM than Farrah?" so I don't think I have you confused for anyone else.

And again, quality over quantity. Helen and Jim Davidson unfortunately were Big Characters in their respective series, but I didn't find either of them to be all that entertaining. Rachel Rice, Chloe, and Paddy certainly entertained me more than they ever did, and I was very satisfied with each of their wins. It's also worth mentioning that this franchise is kinda in shambles and I think Chloe's win was nice and refreshing, reminding us that it is still possible to be a generally nice person and win BB.

Or because he doesn't have a valid argument back and knows that Austin is in the right but he can't justify himself with a legitimate comeback.

Why can't nice but entertaining people win BB though like Scoop for example?

And I don't remember the Chloe comment but I'll take your word for it that I said it, but I definitely stand by that Michelle having homophobic views herself about how Perez should behave whilst telling everybody else to not be prejudiced in anyway was very annoying not to mention hypocritical, so yes I do think that's nastier than Farrah who at least practiced what she preached, even if it was bile.