What a ridiculous comment.

It's been done before and to good effect, why shield them from the views of a possible future president?
Education is key.

It was apt, you never know it might work.

Oh yeah, it was all for the benefit of the children.

Let's face it, if this same thing happened only it wasn't Trump, it was someone you agreed with, you'd be outraged.

And for the record, I think Trump is a waste of good, donatable organs.

Ridicule is never "apt".

If they were saying the things he says I wouldn't be agreeing with them would I? Think about it.

What are you accusing me of now?...

But very strangely and predictably, it's OK for Corbyn to 'tone it down' and become voter 'acceptable'?

What on earth does this mean, or have to do with this thread at all?

It is sadly reminiscent of the way terrorists use their children in their missions, and justify it by claiming the enemy is evil and hateful and deserving of being killed and blown up. A type of; 'The Target justifies the Means'.

It's self explicable in the text you wrote which I quoted:

"They have him bang on, he may have been warned to tone it done but it's too late when you've marginalised a whole sub section of the electorate as 2nd class citizens."

And I'm just pointing out that it is perfectably OK for Corbyn to dilute his terrorist sympathies and his anti-Israel stance, in order to appeal more to the voters, but you are stating in the above post that it is too late for Trump to do the same.

What is so hard to understand about that?

He hasn't marginalised anyone has he?
The rest of your post is your skewed perception of Corbyns work in his capacity as a diplomat as far as I can see.

Yeah, OK then.

This video is only going to help the Donald as he storms to the White House next year

http://pedestriantv-prod.s3.amazonaw...-thumbs-up.jpg

I'm kind of glad that Corbyn's name comes up as much as it does but what on earth has this got to do with this topic?

It hasn't, it just has in relation to a comment made in a post.

I think you might be right MTVN.

But who's gunna clean your toilitt, Donald Chrump?

Video is hilarious by the way: "Ey ese! You try deport grandma I slice you ****ing face OK??"

Not sure why everyone's got their panties in such a twist. It's a pretty lame video, not very well made. Kids swearing (in my opinion) is not an issue sooo... just "meh"? :shrug:

So when he gave his latest speech and said, “When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” How many times did he use the word “illegals”–Zilch. He meant Latinos... all of them.

The sort of people who would vote for Trump are the same sort of people who voted for Hitler and the really sad/sickening/heartbreaking thing is, there are so many who support his "clean house" policies.

Does Trump actually stand a credible chance of becoming president? I mean a serious chance though? I'm not that up on my American politics but the impression I had was that he was a bit of a joke. I didn't think he was actually considered a major contender???

he has no chance against Kanye :hee:

Could Well Do.

"The sort of people who would vote for Trump are the same sort of people who voted for Hitler "

I understand,
what you mean,
But it appears many who never vote back Trump.


Its Amazing he is on NBC 's Saturday Night Live
they will have to keep the Mic's away from the crowd
as this Latino group is offering $5K
for someone to Shout he is a Racist.

:shocked: D: :omgno: :worry:


:nono:

Honestly, yes. It's not unusual for Republican crazies to top the polls in 'silly season' but Trump has sustained his popularity far beyond what anyone expected. Meanwhile the 'serious' contenders for the Republican nominated like Jeb Bush and Scott Walker have been very unimpressive and have pretty terrible poll ratings: Walker was fancied by many to be their candidate but was forced to pull out a couple of months ago because he polling at less than 1%. A lot of anti-Trump Republicans now think their best hope is with Marco Rubio but there's no guarantee that he will suddenly see a massive upsurge in popularity.

And if Trump does get the nomination then who knows what could happen. Clinton will almost certainly be the Democrat but I don't think she's thought of that highly amongst non-Democrats. She's been involved in quite a few scandles and people don't like the fact that she's part of a career politician Clinton dynasty. I actually think the Republicans will win in 2016 never mind who the candidate is: I think Trump will probably fall a bit short but it is definitely possible.