Why is it in SD too, is it imperative we know, or of national importance?
Celebs are as susceptible to life limiting diseases as the rest of us, what's to debate.

It's serious Debates and News Kizzy, this qualifies as News

I thought celebs had their own news bit?...

He is endangering people though :shrug: he had sex with women without telling them

That seems like speculation and until it's a fact that he's actually endangered people then I think this story is unneeded.

But it also needs to be out there if it is true as he may have had one night stands and the women never got tested.

I don't know who this refers to and I don't care. Whoever they are this is a massive invasion of their privacy and I just wish them well without ever wanting to know who they are.

Don't you think the women he failed to tell deserve to know?

still News :shrug:

Rolls eyes.

If the wind changes

Its new because he has aids

he did not get aids for some film roll

Sure but he is in the Public Eye
and the Women he took to bed have
a Outright Right to know if he has infected them.

Thats Set in USA Law

Yeah they deserve to know, but we don't need to. I think that's what Livia's saying.

The women involved can be told without it being made into a public event.

People love the downfall of the mighty

its very human

What if its a non famous person who they no longer have contact with?

Then it's like life where people don't make statements to the press to contact sexual partners they never see again.

Yeah that, basically

Thank you, Jamie. That's exactly what I meant.

Probably really disgusting of me, but since when have I cared about what people think of me... Anyway, my first thought was 'I hope its someone who's known for being a sleaze' because then maybe people will realizing that sleeping with tons of people is not a good thing.

I love a gal with morals. :clap1:

i hope that's not sarcasm!!!!

But yeah, I seriously hate the whole what I call 'Charlie Sheen' attitude that some celebs/people have. It sounds awful but I always hope they get what they deserve.

But a celebrity has the power to get words across.

If everyone thinks gay Celebs should come out then I think it's just as important for Celeb with life threatening diseases that are catchable should tell the world.

Also by not tell someone is very stupid especially if there bleeding and someone is helping them.

I get what you're saying, and it probably could have that effect, but a part of me also thinks that people need to realise that you don't need to be a 'slag' to catch diseases. A lot of people have unprotected sex as like a one off, thinking "well I'll probably be ok coz I don't do it all the time" and that's also a dangerous attitude to have. So if it was someone who isn't known for being a sleaze it could help curb that sort of thing happening. All of that's just 'in theory' anyway though because I'm against whoever it is being outed by the media regardless lol

They do have that power but it should still be up to them if they decide to go public. Also, I don't think everyone does think that gay celebs should have to come out. :shrug: I don't anyway. Regardless, as far as medical information goes, everyone's entitled to privacy regardless of their celebrity status