ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB17 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=683)
-   -   The Twist involving the Toxic HMs (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=296734)

chuff me dizzy 28-01-2016 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 8469082)
If Gemma wasn't allowed be chosen as a toxic HMs and the twist is going to involve the toxic HMs, isn't that unfair? And also, I don't see what was so strenuous about being a toxic HM that she wasn't allowed be chosen anyway, all they had to do was sit in that room really :shrug:

Good thinking there Niamh Gemmas latest "illness" was iffy in the extreme

Niamh. 28-01-2016 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 8469185)
Good thinking there Niamh Gemmas latest "illness" was iffy in the extreme

2 evictions running where Gemma gets handed immunity? Somethings rotten in Denmark :nono:

ThriceShy 28-01-2016 03:04 PM

So big brother chose who could be nominated?

How do they get away with this series after series?

chuff me dizzy 28-01-2016 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 8469189)
2 evictions running where Gemma gets handed immunity? Somethings rotten in Denmark :nono:

Sure is ,if this weeks noms are anything ,even remotely to do with the the toxic task its an 100% ploy to save Gemma, and Im telling you now Facebook will erupt, they already are up in arms of the bias towards Gemma

chuff me dizzy 28-01-2016 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 8469190)
So big brother chose who could be nominated?

How do they get away with this series after series?

It looks like ( not forced to be) like this weeks noms were linked to how was chosen to be toxic, and once again Gemma was "ill"so excused for the toxic task even thought Gillian said she would have chosen her

Niamh. 28-01-2016 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 8469202)
Sure is ,if this weeks noms are anything ,even remotely to do with the the toxic task its an 100% ploy to save Gemma, and Im telling you now Facebook will erupt, they already are up in arms of the bias towards Gemma

FB don't seem happy at all with the task in general, funniest post i read about it was re Gillian : "Someone throw a spider on her ffs" :laugh:

Vanessa 28-01-2016 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 8469207)
FB don't seem happy at all with the task in general, funniest post i read about it was re Gillian : "Someone throw a spider on her ffs" :laugh:

:laugh2:

Niamh. 28-01-2016 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 8469203)
It looks like ( not forced to be) like this weeks noms were linked to how was chosen to be toxic, and once again Gemma was "ill"so excused for the toxic task even thought Gillian said she would have chosen her

She shouldn't have been allowed to nominate either if she wasn't eligible to be chosen as toxic

chuff me dizzy 28-01-2016 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 8469207)
FB don't seem happy at all with the task in general, funniest post i read about it was re Gillian : "Someone throw a spider on her ffs" :laugh:

They are already claiming its fixed for Gemma, and let be honest here, it is

Niamh. 28-01-2016 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 8469212)
They are already claiming its fixed for Gemma, and let be honest here, it is

Yup

jet 28-01-2016 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 8469202)
Sure is ,if this weeks noms are anything ,even remotely to do with the the toxic task its an 100% ploy to save Gemma, and Im telling you now Facebook will erupt, they already are up in arms of the bias towards Gemma

Then wouldn't BB be trying to whip up hate against Gemma? I mean, what are they supposed to be 'saving' her from? She's 60/1 in the bookies, so they couldn't be lining her up for the win.

reece(: 28-01-2016 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 8469189)
2 evictions running where Gemma gets handed immunity? Somethings rotten in Denmark :nono:

Stephanie and Jeremy have had multiple immunities too

chuff me dizzy 28-01-2016 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 8469219)
Then wouldn't BB be trying to whip up hate against Gemma? I mean, what are they supposed to be 'saving' her from? She's 60/1 in the bookies, so they couldn't be lining her up for the win.

Give over Jet, she's got away with blue murder in there, saved by BB from 2 x evictions ,I normally hate it when people cry fix in here, but in this case its true

reece(: 28-01-2016 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 8469231)
Give over Jet, she's got away with blue murder in there, saved by BB from 2 x evictions ,I normally hate it when people cry fix in here, but in this case its true

Others have been saved from 2 evictions, rigged for them too?

Niamh. 28-01-2016 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reece(: (Post 8469225)
Stephanie and Jeremy have had multiple immunities too

Tiff will triumph against all this adversity :')

jet 28-01-2016 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 8469231)
Give over Jet, she's got away with blue murder in there, saved by BB from 2 x evictions ,I normally hate it when people cry fix in here, but in this case its true

She's only had one immunity to date, along with Steph and Darren. If Twitter and Facebook are having meltdowns because of the 'bias' then if they are choosing to make her immune again deliberately then they are fuelling the hate against her and using her for publicity and drama. What other reason would they have for doing it?

chuff me dizzy 28-01-2016 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 8469257)
She's only had one immunity to date, along with Steph and Darren. If Twitter and Facebook are having meltdowns because of the 'bias' then if they are choosing to make her immune again deliberately then they are fuelling the hate against her and using her for publicity and drama. What other reason would they have for doing it?

This one will be twice if BB have saved her again, the mask task was 100% iffy

jet 28-01-2016 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 8469262)
This one will be twice if BB have saved her again, the mask task was 100% iffy

That's not an answer to what I asked. :shrug:

chuff me dizzy 28-01-2016 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 8469275)
That's not an answer to what I asked. :shrug:

I don't know why they are favouring her, but they are

Stormy 28-01-2016 03:56 PM

They should have cancelled the twist when Gillian said that she wanted to pick Gemma but she wasn't allowed.

Gemma would have been toxic and therefore should not have been allowed to vote. By telling Gillian that she can't chose Gemma as toxic then allowing only the non-toxic to nominate is unfair.

Even if there was a legit illness reason for not picking Gemma...the fact that Gillian wanted to pick her first should make Gemma not eligible to nominate. CBB made a big mistake.

jennyjuniper 28-01-2016 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 8469098)
In last nights live feed Gemma said she had been on a diet all day and had done well so she must have involved to some extent. :shrug:

What, a whole day?:shocked:


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.