![]() |
"Finally, how would the FBI get hold of the phone before the attack happens? "
My point is If they did you say do not unlock it. |
The problem with uranium is, its disproportionately heavy for its volume and so transporting any quantity is difficult and because uranium is highly radio active, it has to be packed in lead which is also incredibly heavy. You'd have trouble picking up your bag in an airport without it falling out through the bottom and you would have difficulty getting through any customs because its radio active signature makes it easily detectable.
|
What if the terrorists use throw away phones like they did on 'The Wire'?
|
Quote:
They may do but if Data is on a 2nd proper iPhone that will lead agents to stop a crew getting ready, our own Dezzy says its not to be Unlocked |
Quote:
Sealed air tight. Not Airports Ships deliver to Ports |
Quote:
If someone wanted to smuggle uranium onto US soil then they'd find a way, there's no denying that but we are starting to get into some fairly far fetched scenarios here. |
Quote:
Of Course. The only reason I had to Expand was for Dezzy who will say no to Unlock a Mobile phone that may have data to stop a Nuke in a Van Attack. Most folks say at that point all data is needed (saying yes to unlock a iPhone) to stop the Evil Terrorist Nuke Attack inside America |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Because other phones are used just for Collections not in public places. The Whole Point is Dezzy Point Blank says no to unlocking a Terrorists iPhone. |
The fact you have to keep digging yourself out of holes shows how silly, unrealistic and illogical your little scenario is.
|
Quote:
|
If this ever comes to pass, which it won't, terrorists and criminals will simply use throw away phones.
This isn't about terrorism, at least I don't believe it is. This is about data mining which is worth many £billions. |
Quote:
Anything can happen. I would think if that story happened you view may change thats the only point Dezzy. Respect To You. |
Quote:
As I've explained a thousand times, this ain't about terrorism, the FBI knows they won't find anything on the phone, they just want to set a precedent for the future so they can do it when they please to whoever they please. Like I said before, they're just using Terrorism as an excuse to invade people's privacy. |
Quote:
Because other phones are used just for Collections not in public places. (Thats the type that are chucked away.) So other longer data could be stored on a iPhone away from the Terrorist building and if someone spotted a person they thought was a Terrorist visiting a home of someone else Police could rush in collecting his iPhone after he shot a police man and return fire killed the Evil Terrorist but left the important phone |
Quote:
Not my intention. But it was a Phone from a Terrorist that shocked America as they shot so many with their machine guns. http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-736x414.jpg The massacre in December that killed 14 people. |
There could be aliens, guys. Evil aliens that want to kill people - and the information could be in some guy's WhatsApp messages. The only sensible option I can think of, is for everyone's messages to be sent through the CIA where they can be scanned for key words and flagged for alien activity.
If you're not an alien sympathiser you've got nothing to hide so why are you so scared? Hmm? What's your problem? Bit suspicious if you ask me, you probably have a phone full of alien kiddy porn, otherwise you would be willing - nay, HAPPY, for your private communications to be available. You closet terrorist. |
I hate to piss on any TIBB expert's parade, but:
With at least 8 Nuclear Weapons lost and still unnaccounted for by the USA during the 50's and 60's, and the high probability that there could be MANY times that number of 'missing' nukes or 'stolen' weapons grade nuclear materials in the years since and right up to the present if we choose to disregard the US authorities assurances to the contrary (the SAME authorities who spent decades DENYING that most of these 8 nukes had gone missing in the first place). Add in to this nightmare scenario, the very real probability that a HUNDRED or more nukes were unnaccounted for when the Soviet Union collapsed, and it is ridiculous to intimate that full 'nukes' or 'weapons grade' plutonium or uranium is impossible or even all that 'difficult' for terrorist organisations to obtain. As for; it being impossible to 'smuggle' such nukes or weapons grade material into the USA, when one considers that 75 ILLEGAL TUNNELS leading from MEXICO into the USA have recently been discovered in the San Diego area alone - including 'Super Tech' tunnels complete with railways - Arista's scenario is very FEASIBLE. Especially given the probability that the 75 discovered tunnels are merely the tip of a very large iceberg. |
Quote:
There was actually a tunnel found around 40 miles from the Mexican border and it was the EXACT shape of a stealth bomber, so one probably just flew through that. No one would ever know because they are entirely invisible, and even if someone DID see them, they would be instantly vapourized in nuclear fire. Sooo. |
Government agents manage to lose 8 nuclear weapons and they want us to trust them with our personal information?!?!
|
Quote:
Chances are those nukes have already been recovered and/or destroyed. |
Or sold...
|
Quote:
|
I hate to piss on any TIBB expert's parade, but
Says the TIBB expert of absolutely everything :whistle: |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.