It's about a very real truth....about idiots who admire rich people with quilted lifestyles just because they've been conditioned to by the rich people's publicity machine...same principle as the Kardasians and their army of deluded fans

No.:shrug:

:laugh2:

It's an opinion.

Blimey.

You might want to check his facts before you get carried away.

I asked that danny be removed because of his violent outbursts in the house. I had nothing to do with any website.

Jack appears to be making stuff up now in a desperate attempty to put the boot into andrew.

:joker:

Yeah great, but you used Danny's tweets several times to defend yourself. Now you're saying people shouldn't do that. Why's that?

I seem to remember danny's tweets were threats of violence and wishing death etc on women.

Completely different to this situation.

What jack just said was pure lies and a retraction and apology is expected.

Jack simply asked if it was you he made no accusations

I would suggest you take your own advice and do some research also, never know you could eventually learn the definition of '***' but I'll not hold my breath :hee:

Nobody did what jack suggested. The whole get danny out thing was based on his violence in the house. His threatening tweets against women just confirmed it.

Wrong. I suggest you watch the first 30 seconds of this video and then have another go at getting the facts right.

I think you'll find you did

But you are being a hypocrite. One thread you say the world has gone PC mad for being offended by Andrew using racial slurs and you say it should have no grounds for what we think of him in the house yet you admit to wanting Danny ejected last year based on his old tweets.

I know you're just doing it to be contraversial but you're doing a bad job of it.

Eh? You might want to check your facts and read threads properly because in case you've missed it, not only have I said his tweets shouldn't mean he's ejected, I have also said he looks like a promising housemate.

What I am doing is highlighting your complete hypocrisy in saying there's nothing wrong with Andrew's tweets and we shouldn't be holding them against him, whilst just last year you were doing exactly the same thing and even created a ****ing website which had a page with a load of said tweets on :laugh2:

Now I wonder why you don't mind Andrew's tweets :think:

I created no website.

You accused me of it last year and I said yes it was me so you could dig the hole deeper. :laugh:

The danny situation bears no resemblance to this. He had violent episodes in the house and wanted people to be attacked in the street.

It is so desperate it is laughable.

Omg you posted this in that Danny thread I'm screaming :joker:

Don't you just love it when forum members get so obsessed with you, instead of the housemates, that they go searching through your old posts.:laugh:

Yeah it's great :joker:

Me @ ThriceShy

Actually, if you check the quotes back you'll see it was Ross you responded to saying you take responsibility for the website, not me.

Danny's tweets about people being 'attacked in the street' could've been interpreted as jokes just as much as you're saying Andrew's could be. There isn't a difference whatsoever, just that you agree with Andrew's comments and his 'right to free speech' and so are rather hypocritically defending him in a way you didn't with Danny. At least be consistent like I am

Does Andrew holiday in Dubai too? :fist:

I had an inclining you were contradicting yourself based on things you'd said in the past, asked you if that were the case, didn't believe your answer so went to check for myself. Nothing to do with obsession luv, just wanting to expose hypocrisy :laugh:

Me at this expose

http://66.media.tumblr.com/6e927a5b6...h0eio4_250.gif