ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB 1 - 5 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=549)
-   -   Now, a work permit for Shilpa Shetty (press report and discussion) (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30509)

Ruth 28-02-2007 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Quote:

Originally posted by Ruth

Erm...no it isn't prejudiced. As you yourself have said, Jo made cultural gaffes in the house. She clearly showed herself to be ignorant of Asian culture. I'm not even going to pretend that Jade might have much going on between her ears - even Jade herself would admit that she's not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer ("why don't Eskimos turn into ice people?"). If any of the girls had asked for Shilpa's opinions on any of the problems in India that you listed, it would have been fair enough, and a reasonable question to ask. They didn't - they weren't even interested in her culture, except as a reason to get at her.

And if we only saw a snapshot of those girls - we only saw a snapshot of Shilpa as well. But you seem prepared to make several judgements about her.
Yeah, she did. But to automatically presume that the three of them knew absolutely nothing is prejudiced. Unless you were there whenever any of them were talking, 24 hours a day, of course. All of the hm's have said that certain things weren't shown, including the supposed 'good guys'. Wouldn't your average English/British person be equally as naive about her culture? For all we know, they could've asked her plenty about her culture. Did she ask them about theirs?
Considering Jade thought Cambridge was in London, 'East Angular' was abroad, and she didn't know who George Bush or Tony Blair are, it's not a hard stretch to realise that she's not going to have a clue about Asian culture.

Did Shilpa ask them about their culture? Well, I don't know. Unless you were there whenever any of them were talking, 24 hours a day, of course - you couldn't know either.

Quote:

Indeed. I don't think that she's a bad person at all. Much like anyone else, she has her good points and her bad points, too. But she's been painted as almost serene, somehow floating in a special aura that exists just for her. That's what I'm objecting to, because she hasn't done anything to justify being elevated to some kind of cod-sainthood.
I'm not a particular fan of Shilpa. But I do think she handled herself with grace and dignity. I doubt that Jade could even spell grace or dignity. If that makes me prejudiced, so be it.

Ruth 28-02-2007 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Germaine Greer actually said that there wasn't any racism involved at all.
Is Germaine the mighty oracle then? Does something have to be true, because she said it?

Ruth 28-02-2007 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Saying that they 'wouldn't be capable' is every bit as prejudiced as some would claim the three girls to have been. We only saw a snapshot, we don't know them and we don't know what they are or are not aware of. Jade certainly suggested during the more heated part of her argument that she had at least some insight into the Indian way of life.
Did she? I don't remember that.

Quote:

And yes, Shilpa should indeed be looked down on over those things. We all have different moral values, and greed in the face of poverty is something I'm not prepared to overlook, just because Shilpa plays the part of the dignified victim with much aplomb. Absolute poverty to such degrees doesn't exist in either Britain or America.
Believe me, there are people living in apalling conditions in this country. And there are people in this country who have servants too. Are they all morally reprehensible? Am I morally reprehensible because I enjoy pastimes that cost money, while other people have no money whatsoever?

Quote:

Shilpa's reaction to the conversation about sex and the losing of virginity was overblown and out of proportion. She put a spin on it that never existed, and could easily have not commented at all, or even left the room.
No, it wasn't overblown. She didn't get angry or pick a fight or anything. It was pretty obvious that she did not wish to discuss her virginity or her sex life. That was her perogative, regardless of her culture or background. She tried to answer the question while not touching on the subject of her sexual history. But Jade wouldn't let it lie. It's certainly possible that Jade didn't have the intelligence to see that Shilpa was uncomfortable discussing it, because Jade is not the exactly the cleverest housemate ever is she? But I think it more likely that she just wanted to make Shilpa say it, because it was obvious that Shilpa was not happy talking about it. If Shilpa had left the room or not commented, people would have been criticising her for that as well!

CharlotteSometimes 28-02-2007 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by James

This is all very self-righteous.

I'm sure Jade employs nannys, cleaners, bodyguards etc. to help her - 'servants' by any other name.

They wouldn't be capable because they have no knowledge of such matters let alone alone an interest. This is Jade 'Is East Angular abroad?' Goody we are talking about here. Those three girls (and Jack and Jackiey) didn't have the slightest inclination to discuss weighty subjects of that nature in the house (maybe they should have given them access to the Wikipedia website or something so they could fire off a few stats!). Nothing to do with prejudice - just observed behaviour.

Hang on a sec... Jade lives in the lap of luxury while absolute poverty exists around the world. Should she have to give her money away / sell all her possessions etc by this logic? What difference does it make that Shilpa lives in the same country where absolute poverty exists. Aren't we in the west equally morally responsible. In fact to extend the sanctimoniusness for a second shouldn't ordinary people in this country give away their money to alleviate poverty rather than spend money on all the useless stuff that we buy.

Shilpa isn't a Queen who rules a country or even a politician - in fact as I mentioned before the people of India - and all other parts of the world - are as much our 'own people' as they are to a fellow Indian. We're all part of the human race.

And by employing people at least she is redistributing her wealth as part of the economy. Countries generally become wealthier by having successful businesses like the film industry for instance.

.....

I doubt many people agree that being served in a restaurant is morally wrong either.
It's not at all, James. It's the complete opposite, in fact. But the same could be said about your admittance that you judge people on their past actions, and don't care to give them a clean slate. I don't know you from Adam, or anything in the main about your beliefs and values either, for that matter. In my way of looking at things, everyone deserves a little respect and basic human dignity, until they do something to warrant that privilege being withdrawn. I don't like having people scurrying around at my beck and call. It's belittling, and nobody deserves to be treated in that manner nor has the right to treat others in that way, either. There would be an ever-so-slightly enormous difference in their salaries though, don't you think? It would be good to see a clip of that moment. I can remember several different professions, and wasn't it three chauffeurs? Completely necessary and not suggestive of a rather spoilt individual at all, I'm sure.

This you assume, rather than know as a fact. It would seem that lens you observed events through is somewhat stained with newsprint.

She lives in a house, rather than a penthouse. And 'around the world' doesn't cut it - shifting the goalposts doesn't, either. Shilpa made her fortune from her own people, and she should feel duty bound to redress the balance. Jade made her money in the UK, where absolute poverty does not exist. She's not supporting and endorsing a state which allows people to suffer while she sits back and counts her cash. Using words such as 'sanctimoniusness' is a little rich (no pun intended) when you seemingly consider poverty so very amusing. Some people's consciences run a little deeper than drawing the curtains and telling themselves everything's alright in the world, as long as they're happy.

No, she isn't. She just has a tendency to expect to be treated like a princess. Trying to play the snide racist card is very poor form. The 'we're all members of the human race' scenario is nothing more than a soundbite. You know quite well that there's very little any external government, coalition or charity, etc. could do about the situation, as it's enshrined in the country's caste system. I'm surprised that you've time to type a reply, though. Don't you need to pack and fly out to fight for the salvation of the forgotten in some far distant land, or something? Excuse the sarcasm, but it's catching after encountering it at every line in your post, at the expense of actually addressing the point.

But you're assuming that they're paid wages that would allow that to be the case. It's just a shame that it's so expensive to go to the cinema in India that most can't afford it.

I really don't care, James. I have my moral values, and you no doubt have your own. I can sleep soundly at night. It's not my business to know whether anyone else who reads this thread can do the same or not.

CharlotteSometimes 28-02-2007 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ruth

Considering Jade thought Cambridge was in London, 'East Angular' was abroad, and she didn't know who George Bush or Tony Blair are, it's not a hard stretch to realise that she's not going to have a clue about Asian culture.

Did Shilpa ask them about their culture? Well, I don't know. Unless you were there whenever any of them were talking, 24 hours a day, of course - you couldn't know either.

I'm not a particular fan of Shilpa. But I do think she handled herself with grace and dignity. I doubt that Jade could even spell grace or dignity. If that makes me prejudiced, so be it.
Gosh, is it International Sarcasm Day today and I've somehow missed it, Ruth? I won't reply in kind, as I've more respect for you than that.

Do you not have any friends or associates who perhaps aren't blessed with a great deal of intelligence, Ruth? If so, I'd bet you don't view them with such disdain. It's not Jade's fault that she's not exactly rocket scientist material, is it?

I think she did too, for the most part. Although with her tongue pressed firmly into her cheek.

Quote:

Originally posted by Ruth

Is Germaine the mighty oracle then? Does something have to be true, because she said it?
If you look at the article I quoted Ruth, it suggests that she supported the racism allegations, when in fact she denounced them.


Quote:

Originally posted by Ruth

Did she? I don't remember that.

Believe me, there are people living in apalling conditions in this country. And there are people in this country who have servants too. Are they all morally reprehensible? Am I morally reprehensible because I enjoy pastimes that cost money, while other people have no money whatsoever?

No, it wasn't overblown. She didn't get angry or pick a fight or anything. It was pretty obvious that she did not wish to discuss her virginity or her sex life. That was her perogative, regardless of her culture or background. She tried to answer the question while not touching on the subject of her sexual history. But Jade wouldn't let it lie. It's certainly possible that Jade didn't have the intelligence to see that Shilpa was uncomfortable discussing it, because Jade is not the exactly the cleverest housemate ever is she? But I think it more likely that she just wanted to make Shilpa say it, because it was obvious that Shilpa was not happy talking about it. If Shilpa had left the room or not commented, people would have been criticising her for that as well!
Yes, she did. It was one of the lines that was twisted afterwards, when Jade mentioned 'slums'.

Nobody is living in abject poverty here, unless they've removed themselves from society for whatever reason. Yes, there are some in that situation. But they're not beyond help - and I'm not expanding on that any further and being drawn into a sideways argument. Suffice to say that there are support systems in place for those in need. And I've yet to see entire villages of people living on rubbish dumps in this country. That reads as though I have a problem with those people, when I don't. It's their government which allows it to happen in the first place that I have a problem with. And yeah, people who 'employ' servants are morally reprehensible. As for you personally, I don't know. Do you earn your living from a vast number of people who admire and look up to you?

It was overblown, because she could've removed herself from the conversation or even the room whenever she wanted to. She stayed willingly, ergo she didn't actually have quite as much of a problem with it as she suggested. It was a fuss about nothing. A fuss for the sake of a fuss.

Ruth 28-02-2007 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Gosh, is it International Sarcasm Day today and I've somehow missed it, Ruth? I won't reply in kind, as I've more respect for you than that.

Do you not have any friends or associates who perhaps aren't blessed with a great deal of intelligence, Ruth? If so, I'd bet you don't view them with such disdain. It's not Jade's fault that she's not exactly rocket scientist material, is it?
I didn't criticise Jade for being stupid. I was just stating that she is stupid. Did I say it was a bad thing?

No, it's not International Sarcasm Day today. I don't think what I wrote was any more sarcastic than most of your posts tbh! But I'm not trying to have an argument.

I have plenty of friends, but none of them are remotely like Jade.

CharlotteSometimes 28-02-2007 05:23 PM

Well you mention it a heck of a lot, and it's really not anything that anyone is going to doubt or doesn't already know. So yes, if it's mentioned in a dismissive post then it comes across as though it's meant as 'a bad thing'.

I wouldn't say that I've been at all sarcastic towards you today.

Fair enough, you're not obliged to answer questions, of course. But that wasn't really what I asked, was it? What is Jade like, including all of the bits that happened outside of the argument with Shilpa, and her conversations with Danielle and Jo?

Ruth 28-02-2007 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by CharlotteSometimes
Well you mention it a heck of a lot, and it's really not anything that anyone is going to doubt or doesn't already know. So yes, if it's mentioned in a dismissive post then it comes across as though it's meant as 'a bad thing'.

I wouldn't say that I've been at all sarcastic towards you today.

Fair enough, you're not obliged to answer questions, of course. But that wasn't really what I asked, was it? What is Jade like, including all of the bits that happened outside of the argument with Shilpa, and her conversations with Danielle and Jo?
I mentioned it in relation to the fact that you said that she may have asked Shilpa about her culture, but we didn't see it. Yes, it's possible, but the point I was trying to make was that it was unlikely, given Jade's level of intelligence. I wasn't saying that it was a bad thing that she was stupid - I mentioned it only because I was illustrating that I thought it was unlikely that she had asked Shilpa any in depth conversations about her culture. Do I mention it a heck of a lot? I wasn't aware of that. I would only ever intend to mention it if it was relevant to the thread I was posting in.

Any disdain I show towards Jade is not anything to do with what I think of her IQ - just what I think of her attitude.

Sorry, I'm not meaning to avoid answering any questions.:puzzled:


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.