Quote:
Originally Posted by GiRTh
(Post 9016024)
Exactly. If we are to discredit the Trump accusers then we must surely discredit the Clinton accusers too but that doesn't seem to be happening. Both men have a awful past with women so I don't see how anyone can defend either of them TBH.
Of course the timing is to coincide with the Wiki leaks release. :shrug: When the camera cut to Bill Clinton's stern face at last Sundays debate when Trump was bringing up Bill's indiscretions; I think that was the moment war was declared by the Clintons on Trump. I would doubt Trump has anywhere near the resources of the Clinton political machine so expect more stories and more scandal.
Trump should have kept Bill Clinton name out of his mouth. I thought it was going to be a poor move to bring up Bills accusers but when, at the debate, Trump recalled the names it bought it all back to me and how badly the Clintons have treated women. Now we have the backlash and Trump will do well to deny every story they're gonna break on him.
|
It's all a bit petty really. For either to set an example to the nation they need to get beyond the smear campaign at some point to make a case. That's all that seems to get covered on the news these days, not the good things we are doing as a nation, but all the little smear campaigns each party is running against the other and other various public jabs…
Trump we know is the Mudking, but Clinton (Hillary) wants it so bad, she doesn't care how low it goes as long as she wins… despite its negative effect on the morale of our country. However, she's playing it very smart and making sure to have other people do her dirty work for her (like Miss Obama, Alicia Machado)... I've noticed that a lot on Twitter as well, she’ll grab onto other figures who are anti-Trump, popularize their message and then borrow some from the list of Trump enemies turned supporters as messaging to sway the vote from Trump... she could run for election for several years just picking off people off the list of people Trump has made an enemy alone.
In a way, she has no choice, because losing the election to Trump could be worse beyond the effects of a smear campaign… but still, it doesn’t speak to their quality that they have to go to this level just to remain politically viable.
It’s balancing out in a way. During the primaries, it was Trump TV 24/7 and Hillary's running was just an inevitable reality... yeah, whatever she wants to president, what else is new... post-primary she's done a good job at least being front and center with regards to the Trump narrative, though all they still want to talk about is Trump...
|