Originally Posted by Alisch (Post 9562110)

What I don't get about the British is, that when a child is mentioned in an argument and it's not malicious towards the child, people just lose their **** completely. Jemma has her faults and is a stirrer (just like Paul is). But she wasn't attacking the kid, was she? It was exactly the same with Rebecca. It's like a jinx. Just say daughter/son in an argument, and it's a free pass for the other person to scream their head off.

Same goes for Paul complaining about her mentioning his drinking problem. He made hus life choices, so now he has to face the consequences like it being brought up.

What is with all this mollycoddling? Poor Paul, poor Sarah, poor whatever. It's not like they were forced to lead their lives the way they did. Why should everyone bend over backwards to never mention the stuff they've done? It's sure mentioned a lot that dirty Jemma did this and that. But that is fine, because that's Jemma and she can take it. Oh, the double standards.

Originally Posted by Alisch (Post 9562110)

What I don't get about the British is, that when a child is mentioned in an argument and it's not malicious towards the child, people just lose their **** completely. Jemma has her faults and is a stirrer (just like Paul is). But she wasn't attacking the kid, was she? It was exactly the same with Rebecca. It's like a jinx. Just say daughter/son in an argument, and it's a free pass for the other person to scream their head off.

Same goes for Paul complaining about her mentioning his drinking problem. He made hus life choices, so now he has to face the consequences like it being brought up.

What is with all this mollycoddling? Poor Paul, poor Sarah, poor whatever. It's not like they were forced to lead their lives the way they did. Why should everyone bend over backwards to never mention the stuff they've done? It's sure mentioned a lot that dirty Jemma did this and that. But that is fine, because that's Jemma and she can take it. Oh, the double standards.