Before evidence is heard and they are put to trial?

How very National Socialist of you

:rolleyes:

Im sure you said the same about Islamic terrorists though

Not the type of thing I would say but I hope you are not comparing men arrested under suspicion to captured or dead terrorists apprehended during an actual act of terrorism?

White people don't get arrested on Terrorism charges for nothing especially soldiers. The courts will see this evidence and come up with the right conviction.

Oh dear, the bigots are out to play.

Fixed

Why do people of colour want to come to live in our White supremacist country Dezzy? Our horrid bigoted country.

If only they'd listened to you, you could have told them exactly what White people are, and then they may not of all come over, and be subjected to the White people (aka racists).

I don't think anyone gets arrested on terrorism charges for... nothing

It's not Russia

:nono: As we can see from this forum, the majority of British people are very accepting. It's only a sad minority percentage who are still small-minded and xenophobic. :hee:.

You're one of the xenophobic ones right? I mean you hate what the Queen stands for, and she stands for Britain. So that means you hate the country of Britain, which makes you xenophobic, right?

No. I don't think you understand the meaning of xenophobic :think:. Or what the Queen stands for :think:.

The Queen stands for Monarchy, so I guess you could accuse me of Tyrannophobia, which is "a fear of monarchy". I mean, I'm not afraid of them, but it's closer to the mark than xenophobia, which would have absolutely nothing at all to do with the Queen or monarchy. Of course even if the queen DID stand for Britain, a dislike of the Queen and Royalty - even a dislike of Britain itself - would have no relation to Xenophobia. Which - just to clarify for you Alf, as you appear to be struggling - specifically means "dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries".

You just had to say, "no! I'm not" I'd have accepted that as an answer.

Not you then, just other people?

Yes but then you would have ploughed on through life in ignorance, completely misunderstanding the meaning of the word "xenophobia".

People who are prejudiced against or dislike people from other countries, as per the definition Alf. Do we really have to go over it again? You could just reread the last post...

You really struggle with the definition of words, huh?

You should try responding to what posts actually say instead of responding to what you want them to have said.

You hate what my country stands for. And technically I'm from a different country than you. Me England you Scotland. So you can see why people would think you're a xenophobe.

Your country stands for The Monarchy? :think: I would imagine there are a lot of English people who would disagree with you. You mean that I hate what you, personally stand for but I'm afraid that I simply don't accept that you are a representative example of the average English citizen, Alf. 40 or 50 years ago, maybe. Not in 2017.

The Monarch is the country. When you bad mouth the Monarch, you bad mouth the country.

If you got rid of the Monarch, then all what is hers and ours goes into politicians hands.

Money
Armed forces
Police
Courts
Parliament
ect


Defend your Monarch, and have a feeling of safety in your life. The Monarch is your biggest protection in life, it keeps you from the dictators. Although they're trying to get rid, but need the people to all turn on the Monarch. So don't do it.

Oh my. I don't even know where to start. Actually... I'm just not going to.

Good.

And yes! I've got the last word in.:cheer2:

No offense to anyone here but only a fool takes up a fool's argument.

It’s not an accident that most of the longest-lasting free, law-governed countries in the world are constitutional monarchies.

By having a non-political monarch we can respect, we are freed to be properly disrespectful towards politicians, while remaining loyal to our country. Without a monarch, loyalty can demand political submission.

The British monarch is like the king on a chessboard. He cannot attack. But by occupying his square he prevents others from doing so.

I think the immediate royal family is good for the country but inherited power is not meritocratic so hereditary peerages to anyone other than the immediate royal family needs to die off. Rich people rewarding their privileged offspring with titles is a nonsense.

I think ISIS more than tip the scumberg category.

What's that got to do with the subject of this thread ? Oh yeah..........NOTHING, but you struggle to post without somehow mentioning ''the evil Muslims''. :sleep:

And apart from being nothing to do with the subject of the thread your 'comment' doesn't even make sense.