Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 9828717)

1. Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2. How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her?
Yes they do.
OK - so who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her"

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 9828718)

:clap1::clap1:You are very wise Robo, I see no lies

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 9828717)

1.
Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2.
How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her? Yes they do!
Who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and true she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her" !!

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.



.

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 9828718)

:clap1::clap1:You are very wise Robo, I see no lies

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 9828982)

I hope you are not inferring other members tell lies on here.

Do we not all just give opinions as we see and feel them,or is anyone not agreeing with you possibly just lying.

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 9828717)

1.
Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2.
How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her? Yes they do!
Who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and true she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her" !!

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.



.

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 9828989)

No one has said that at all , I meant his post was accurate imo,is that ok with you? or do I have to run everything past you? If I thought someone was a liar I would tell them , I have my opinion ,you have yours ,so let it be !!!

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 9828717)

1.
Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2.
How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her? Yes they do!
Who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and true she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her" !!

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.



.

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 9829309)

robodog ending da hataz



skillz

Originally Posted by Robodog (Post 9828717)

1.
Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2.
How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her? Yes they do!
Who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and true she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her" !!

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.



.

Originally Posted by clairefromsomewhereinnort (Post 9827782)

And she said she s never happy to see Courtney. i think we all know why Widdicombe wants Shane J out. Cos Pure and Simple - SHE S A BIGOT. And she blocks other people showing their true selves cos no one dare stand up against her so why s she still in ?

Originally Posted by clairefromsomewhereinnort (Post 9827782)

And she said she s never happy to see Courtney. i think we all know why Widdicombe wants Shane J out. Cos Pure and Simple - SHE S A BIGOT. And she blocks other people showing their true selves cos no one dare stand up against her so why s she still in ?