Originally Posted by Milja. (Post 10848136)

It’s quite obvious that the people In this thread who are running their mouth about Anna have never been on the receiving end of racially charged assault/harassment. I think it’s quite vile that you are attacking Anna who is the victim and defending those people who assaulted her with verbal and physical violence. It’s clear that your too ignorant to think about what’s really going on in this article. And that is the media vilifying Brown women, as “violent” and “dangerous” individuals For daring to stand up for themselves. that’s what’s truly vile about all this

Originally Posted by Milja. (Post 10848136)

It’s quite obvious that the people In this thread who are running their mouth about Anna have never been on the receiving end of racially charged assault/harassment. I think it’s quite vile that you are attacking Anna who is the victim and defending those people who assaulted her with verbal and physical violence. It’s clear that your too ignorant to think about what’s really going on in this article. And that is the media vilifying Brown women, as “violent” and “dangerous” individuals For daring to stand up for themselves. that’s what’s truly vile about all this

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10848145)

There is standing up for yourself, then there is common assault....if we all went round kicking people in the face if they called us a name how would that play out

Originally Posted by Milja. (Post 10848151)

Have you suffered racially charged assault/harassment for your whole life?

Originally Posted by Barry. (Post 10848152)

Oh you have? Did you assault them?

Originally Posted by Milja. (Post 10848151)

Have you suffered racially charged assault/harassment for your whole life?

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10848154)

Not assault but as an Irish person living in the UK plenty prejudice, maybe I will kick them in the face next time see how that goes

Originally Posted by Milja. (Post 10848156)

So not assault then. I’m not saying to fight someone when they haven’t attacked you dummy. I’m saying that they had it coming mostly as the instigated it with violence they should know every action has A reaction

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10848157)

So they were attacked? Leave out the name calling you are making yourself look inarticulate

Originally Posted by sleleen (Post 10847956)

if yall actually read what actually happened and the things on their insta stories that prove they did nowt wrong, mandi and anna would hardly just go up and come for strangers that they dont even know so ****

Originally Posted by Milja. (Post 10848151)

Have you suffered racially charged assault/harassment for your whole life?

Originally Posted by DouglasS (Post 10848162)

I think the video is better Evidence than Anna’s personal social media :laugh:
And there is something wrong with a 30 year old dragging a 16 year old by their hair, regardless if the 16 year old was calling her names. The 16 year old was acti childish, but at least she’s a child... Anna is 30

Originally Posted by Daniel. (Post 10848165)

Basically

People recognised Anna and were giving her abuse which the Vakillis tried to ignore, however the teens followed them, hit their cousin and it was only then that the Vakilli's got physical.

A video has emerged since of the girl admitting she had a gun.

Please tell me how on earth Anna is in the wrong?

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10848181)

When did a 7 year old become part of the equation. :joker:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10848181)

When did a 7 year old become part of the equation. :joker:

Originally Posted by DouglasS (Post 10848193)

I was opening the discussion up to at what age/point does it become acceptable to pull someone by their head / kick them when their down regardless if they’ve thrown out abuse. Considering this girl is 16 and is regarded as a child. It must have went over your head

Originally Posted by DouglasS (Post 10848169)

So if a 7 year old was racist to you you’d also lick their head in because they were racist so it’s okay?

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10848194)

So... irrelevant. 16 is not a child.