Free Palestine whilst attacking Jewish people is bit more of a course for concern.

So it is the very definition of a both sides situation, if both sides are doing bad things.

Biden hates the rise of anti-semitism in europe

he is old enough to remember the war

These mobs will be attacking Spurs fans next

very worrying times

If someone attacks you but you fight back, are you both as bad as each other?

In response to terrorist sympathisers chanting for Arabs to be raped and murdered while they attack innocent people and terrorise a town? I explain it as a consequence of thugs actions and in no way the same or comparable

You're bang on about YouTube.

Some of the opinions that right wing YouTubers have held on there is... Unique I'll politely call it.:joker:

DT update
 

Jews kicked, beaten and humiliated: How a night of ‘pogrom’ in Amsterdam unfolded


Fans of Maccabi Tel Aviv were subjected to attacks by pro-Palestine hooligans before and after their team’s Europa League match against Ajax

https://cf.eip.telegraph.co.uk/respo...1085739999.jpg

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-ne...-in-amsterdam/

I'm not saying that the Jewish in this case are innocent though.

I'm just acknowledging that the response was also really bad.

Surely we all know that all football fans have their elements of hooliganism, violence and bigotry. Surely we also all know that those do not make up 100% of a teams fan base.

Plenty of groups of English fans over the years have disgraced themselves on away days in Europe and at home. Doesn't mean that every single member of that fan base deserve to be abused, attacked and intimidated especially by assailants with racially charged motivations. But 'W Amsterdam' I guess.

That's self-defense so no.

But I'm even seeing pictures with some of them holding Hamas flags Slim, I think that some of them were being violent for Anti-Semitic motives.

But any that were just defending themselves from being attacked by violent Jewish people is legit imo, because obviously nobody should accept being violently attacked.

Obviously that's also wrong, I agree with you on that.

Honest, match-going English fans got caught up with hooligans all the time.
"racially charged motivations" Oh you mean the fans that started it all off by shouting about gazan schools and killing Arabs?
w for honest brokerage, i guess.

Do the locals always dress in flag?

Indeed look at what Liverpool did in Europe :umm2:

it resulted in a ban for all English clubs for 5 whole years

Your algorithm takes you to them.

I dont see any on my suggestions.:smug:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gb3OOzdW...jpg&name=small

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gb3OOzaW...jpg&name=small

Donyou hold the same views on the recent riots in the UK? Especially in southport.

Oh that's okay then

And it's perfectly possible for groups on both sides to have racist motivations which is Mocks point and is surely self evident

And this also on eve of Kristallnacht anniversary.


No other way to describe this other than a modern-day pogrom!




These far-left mobs must be stopped

I'm glad you're finally able to recognise the scourge of hooliganism. Remember when you liked LFC, but then didn't because of me :laugh:

Being sad and pathetic doesn't illicit a negative response from me. try harder.

w mentioning liverpool I guess :smug:

Britain sending arms to macca tel Aviv.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DUV1TJa62/

Ahh yes, this is the new rule of just accepting footie fans in cities attacking and doing whatever they want. Point to one example of football hooliganism ever before being a both sides issue. Just one.

Not sure I get you, football hooliganism is frequently a both sides issue with rival fan bases clashing

A post of the macca fans tearing down a Palestinian flag before the game was shared on left wing platforms to incite violence and retribution for this after the match.

My bad, I should have been more specific. So when one team/country goes into another country and attacks and instigates, when has that ever been labelled as both sides? I don't remember the English hooligans in the france WC being excused. Wasn't it called a scurge on the country or something like that?

Instead this has been turned around so that now it's the hooligan perpetrators who are the real victims.