ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB10 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=128)
-   -   Marcus' Weak Muscles - Worse than Usual? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114214)

30stone 24-08-2009 05:27 PM
Like ive said before i put some marcus fans and some haters in the same group lol.

Vicky. 24-08-2009 08:49 PM
This post is hilarious...as is the fact that people seem to reckon marcus is a weakling because he lost a wrestling match covered in baby oil..

Wrestling is more about technique than strength...I thought that was pretty obvious...obviously not to some people.

Having said that, Im not trying to make out that marcus is stronger than siavash, we wouldnt know that, but marcus is certainly not the 8year old girl type that you lot are trying to make out...just because he lost this task.

The lengths some people will go to to try and discredit marcus is just laughable really.

But well done to Siavash anyway :spin:

farhad 24-08-2009 09:03 PM
The thing is, siavash knew the skills to defeat marcus, or else why wasn't siavash out of the ring, he used his strength to suplex him and just locked him so marcus cant get out.

ElProximo 26-08-2009 07:39 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by scot
I stand by my analysis of you...I think it is very probably accurate. You have picked out a few lines from my previous post but you have steered well clear of the actual body of the analysis itself.
This is a common avoidance trait amongst people with 'issues' when those same issues are 'outed'.
You admit yourself that you identify with Marcus? If i got that right then why not the 'issues' you have?
You should read R. D. Laing's - The Divided Self. and also Sanity, Madness and the Family. It may help you.
Of course Laing's gig re the family(and perhaps by extension wider society)being the deciding factor re mental health is largely out of favour these days. But it might be a good starting point for you.
There is also the vibe that you might be some kind of feminist, but of the outdated 1st/2nd wave type. That is so pre 1990 and largely superceded by smarter go-getter type feminists. Have a look at some of the third wave feminist stuf out there both as related to serious academic thought and in popular culture.
Oh there is a much simpler reason for my disapproval of Marcus:
I strongly disapprove of sneaky behavior, lying, gossiping, cowardice and bad humour.
Easy.

charmingmissc 26-08-2009 07:42 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by ElProximo
Quote:
Originally posted by scot
I stand by my analysis of you...I think it is very probably accurate. You have picked out a few lines from my previous post but you have steered well clear of the actual body of the analysis itself.
This is a common avoidance trait amongst people with 'issues' when those same issues are 'outed'.
You admit yourself that you identify with Marcus? If i got that right then why not the 'issues' you have?
You should read R. D. Laing's - The Divided Self. and also Sanity, Madness and the Family. It may help you.
Of course Laing's gig re the family(and perhaps by extension wider society)being the deciding factor re mental health is largely out of favour these days. But it might be a good starting point for you.
There is also the vibe that you might be some kind of feminist, but of the outdated 1st/2nd wave type. That is so pre 1990 and largely superceded by smarter go-getter type feminists. Have a look at some of the third wave feminist stuf out there both as related to serious academic thought and in popular culture.
Oh there is a much simpler reason for my disapproval of Marcus:
I strongly disapprove of sneaky behavior, lying, gossiping, cowardice and bad humour.
Easy.

yet you support lisa

ElProximo 26-08-2009 07:47 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by charmingmissc
Quote:
Originally posted by ElProximo
Quote:
Originally posted by scot
I stand by my analysis of you...I think it is very probably accurate. You have picked out a few lines from my previous post but you have steered well clear of the actual body of the analysis itself.
This is a common avoidance trait amongst people with 'issues' when those same issues are 'outed'.
You admit yourself that you identify with Marcus? If i got that right then why not the 'issues' you have?
You should read R. D. Laing's - The Divided Self. and also Sanity, Madness and the Family. It may help you.
Of course Laing's gig re the family(and perhaps by extension wider society)being the deciding factor re mental health is largely out of favour these days. But it might be a good starting point for you.
There is also the vibe that you might be some kind of feminist, but of the outdated 1st/2nd wave type. That is so pre 1990 and largely superceded by smarter go-getter type feminists. Have a look at some of the third wave feminist stuf out there both as related to serious academic thought and in popular culture.
Oh there is a much simpler reason for my disapproval of Marcus:
I strongly disapprove of sneaky behavior, lying, gossiping, cowardice and bad humour.
Easy.

yet you support lisa
That is correct.
Even if Lisa was close to the liar, hypocrite, passive-aggressive little Don't try to get past the swear filter that Marcus is,
even if,
It is better to call one wrongdoer (Marcus) and we can work on the others later.
But Marcus is up now and is by far the worst offender with few redeeming qualities.

Lisa is straight-forward, honest, gruff sometimes but redeems herself with everyone.
She is good people.

Marcus is a sneaky little a-hole full of contempt. That is all the reason needed to dislike him.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:45 AM.
Page 3 of 3 12 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.